AgebergEForssbladMHerbertssonPRoosEM. Sex differences in patient-reported outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: data from the Swedish knee ligament register. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(7):1334-1342.
2.
AndersonAF. Rating scales. In FuFHHarnerCDVinceKL, eds. Knee Surgery. Williams & Wilkins; 1994:275-296.
3.
ArdernCLTaylorNFFellerJAWebsterKE. Return-to-sport outcomes at 2 to 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(1):41-48.
4.
ArdernCLTaylorNFFellerJAWhiteheadTSWebsterKE. Psychological responses matter in returning to preinjury level of sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(7):1549-1558.
5.
ArdernCLWebsterKETaylorNFFellerJA. Return to the preinjury level of competitive sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: two-thirds of patients have not returned by 12 months after surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(3):538-543.
6.
BorchersJRKaedingCCPedrozaADHustonLJSpindlerKPWrightRW; MOON Consortium and the MARS Group. Intra-articular findings in primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a comparison of the MOON and MARS study groups. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(9):1889-1893.
7.
ChhadiaAMInacioMCMaletisGBCsintalanRPDavisBRFunahashiTT. Are meniscus and cartilage injuries related to time to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(9):1894-1899.
8.
DunnWRSpindlerKP; MOON Consortium. Predictors of activity level 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR): a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) ACLR cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(10):2040-2050.
9.
DunnWRWolfBRAmendolaA, et al. Multirater agreement of arthroscopic meniscal lesions. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1937-1940.
10.
EjerhedLKartusJSernertNKöhlerKKarlssonJ. Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective randomized study with a two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(1):19-25.
11.
FellerJAWebsterKE. A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(4):564-573.
12.
GagliardiAGCarryPMParikhHBTraverJLHowellDRAlbrightJC. ACL repair with suture ligament augmentation is associated with a high failure rate among adolescent patients. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(3):560-566.
13.
GetgoodAMJBryantDMLitchfieldR, et al. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis reduces failure of hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 2-year outcomes from the STABILITY study randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(2):285-297.
14.
GifstadTFossOAEngebretsenL, et al. Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2319-2328.
15.
GlasbrennerJRascjleMJKittlC, et al. Comparable instrumented knee joint laxity and patient-reported outcomes after ACL repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization or ACL reconstruction: 5-year results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(12):3256-3264.
16.
HeathELSalmonLJCooperRPappasERoeJPPinczewskiLA. 5-year survival of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with living donor hamstring tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(1):41-51.
17.
HeftiFMüllerWJakobRPStäubliHU. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993;1(3-4):226-234.
18.
HoogeslagRAGBrouwerRWBoerBCde VriesAJHuis In ’t VeldR. Acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: repair or reconstruction? Two-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(3):567-577.
19.
HoogeslagRAGHuis In ’t VeldRBrouwerRWde GraaffFVerdonschotN. Acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: repair or reconstruction? Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(7):1779-1787.
20.
IrrgangJJAndersonAFBolandAL, et al. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(5):600-613.
21.
KaedingCCPedrozaADReinkeEKHustonLJ; MOON Consortium, Spindler KP.Risk factors and predictors of subsequent ACL injury in either knee after ACL reconstruction: prospective analysis of 2488 primary ACL reconstructions from the MOON cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1583-1590.
22.
KöstersCGlasbrennerJSpickermannL, et al. Repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization versus primary reconstruction of acute anterior cruciate ligament tears: 2-year results from a prospective randomized study. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(5):1108-1116.
23.
LeysTSalmonLWallerALinklaterJPinczewskiL. Clinical results and risk factors for reinjury 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(3):595-605.
24.
LindMMenhertFPedersenAB. Incidence and outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish registry for knee ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(7):1551-1557.
25.
MaletisGBCameronSLTenganJJBurchetteRJ. A prospective randomized study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of patellar tendon and quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis tendons fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(3):384-394.
26.
MaletisGBChenJInacioMCFunahashiTT. Age-related risk factors for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 21,304 patients from the Kaiser Permanente anterior cruciate ligament registry. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(2):331-336.
27.
MaletisGBInacioMCFunahashiTT. Analysis of 16,192 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from a community-based registry. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(9):2090-2098.
28.
MaletisGBInacioMCFunahashiTT. Risk factors associated with revision and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in the Kaiser Permanente ACLR registry. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(3):641-647.
29.
MARS Group. Effect of graft choice on the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2301-2310.
30.
MARS Group, MagnussenRABorchersJR, et al. Risk factors and predictors of significant chondral surface change from primary to revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a MOON and MARS cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(3):557-564.
31.
MARS Group, WrightRWHustonLJ, et al. Association between graft choice and 6-year outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the MARS cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(10):2589-2598.
32.
MARS Group, WrightRWHustonLJ, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(10):1979-1986.
33.
MARS Group, WrightRWHustonLJ, et al. Predictors of patient-reported outcomes at 2 years after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(10):2394-2401.
34.
McPhersonALFellerJAHewettTEWebsterKE. Psychological readiness to return to sport is associated with second anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(4):857-862.
35.
MOON Group, EverhartJSJonesMH, et al. The clinical radiographic incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis 10 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: data from the MOON nested cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(5):1251-1261.
36.
MorganMDSalmonLJWallerARoeJPPinczewskiLA. Fifteen-year survival of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged 18 years and younger. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(2):384-392.
37.
MurrayMMFlemingBCBadgerGJ; BEAR Trial Team, et al. Bridge-enhanced anterior cruciate ligament repair is not inferior to autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2 years: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(6):1305-1315.
38.
NoyesFRMangineREBarberS. Early knee motion after open and arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1987;15(2):149-160.
39.
PaulosLNoyesFRGroodEButlerDL. Knee rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and repair. Am J Sports Med. 1981;9(3):140-149.
40.
PiaseckiDPSpindlerKPWarrenTAAndrishJTParkerRD. Intraarticular injuries associated with anterior cruciate ligament tear: findings at ligament reconstruction in high school and recreational athletes. An analysis of sex-based differences. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(4):601-605.
41.
PinczewskiLADeehanDJSalmonLJRussellVJClingelefferA. A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(4):523-536.
42.
RahardjaRLoveHClatworthyMGMonkAPYoungSW. Higher rate of return to preinjury activity levels after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bone–patellar tendon–bone versus hamstring tendon autograft in high-activity patients: results from the New Zealand ACL registry. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(13):3488-3494.
43.
RahardjaRZhuMLoveHClatworthyMGMonkAPYoungSW. Effect of graft choice on revision and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the New Zealand ACL registry. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(1):63-69.
44.
SalmonLJHeathEAkrawiHRoeJPLinklaterJPinczewskiLA. 20-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: the catastrophic effect of age and posterior tibial slope. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(3):531-543.
45.
ShelbourneKDNitzP. Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18(3):292-299.
46.
SnaebjörnssonTHamrin SenorskiEAyeniOR, et al. Graft diameter as a predictor for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and KOOS and EQ-5D values: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register based on 2240 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(9):2092-2097.
47.
Sonnery-CottetBSaithnaACavalierM, et al. Anterolateral ligament reconstruction is associated with significantly reduced ACL graft rupture rates at a minimum follow-up of 2 years: a prospective comparative study of 502 patients from the SANTI study group. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(7):1547-1557.
48.
Sonnery-CottetBThaunatMFreychetBPupimBHMurphyCGClaesS. Outcome of a combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction technique with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1598-1605.
49.
SpindlerKPMcCartyECWarrenTADevinCConnorJT. Prospective comparison of arthroscopic medial meniscal repair technique: inside-out suture versus entirely arthroscopic arrows. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(6):929-934.
50.
SpindlerKPSchilsJPBergfeldJA, et al. Prospective study of osseous, articular, and meniscal lesions in recent anterior cruciate ligament tears by magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21(4):551-557.
51.
SundarajKSalmonLJHeathEL, et al. Bioabsorbable versus titanium screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: a prospective, randomized controlled trial with 13-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(6):1316-1326.
52.
ThompsonSMSalmonLJWallerALinklaterJRoeJPPinczewskiLA. Twenty-year outcome of a longitudinal prospective evaluation of isolated endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(12):3083-3094.
53.
VermeijdenHDvan der ListJPDiFeliceGS. Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears with suture augmentation. Video J Sports Med. 2021;1(3):26350254211005461.
54.
WebbJMSalmonLJLeclercEPinczewskiLARoeJP. Posterior tibial slope and further anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed patient. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(12):2800-2804.
55.
WebsterKEFellerJAHartnettNLeighWBRichmondAK. Comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 15-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(1):83-90.
56.
WebsterKEMcPhersonALHewettTEFellerJA. Factors associated with a return to preinjury level of sport performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(11):2557-2562.
