Medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) injuries accelerate the progression of osteoarthritis. While partial meniscectomy was once considered the gold standard for treatment, meniscus root repair has become increasingly utilized with reported improvements in clinical and biomechanical outcomes.
Purpose:
To perform a systematic review of biomechanical outcomes and a meta–analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes after MMPR repair.
Study Design:
Meta-analysis and systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods:
The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried in August 2021 for studies reporting biomechanical, clinical, and radiographic outcomes after MMPR repair. Biomechanical studies were assessed for main results and conclusions. Data including study characteristics, cohort demographics, and outcomes were extracted. Included clinical studies were analyzed with a random–effects meta-analysis of proportions for binary outcomes or continuous outcomes for mean differences between preoperative and postoperative time points. Subgroup analysis for studies reporting repair outcomes with concomitant high tibial osteotomy (HTO) was performed where appropriate.
Results:
A total of 13 biomechanical studies were identified and reported an overall improvement in mean and peak contact pressures after MMPR repair. There were 24 clinical studies, consisting of 876 patients (877 knees), identified, with 3 studies (106 knees) reporting outcomes with concomitant HTO. The mean patient age was 57.1 years (range, 23-74 years), with a mean follow–up of 27.7 months (range, 2-64 months). Overall, clinical outcomes (Lysholm, Hospital for Special Surgery, International Knee Documentation Committee, visual analog scale for pain, Tegner, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score scores) were noted to improve postoperatively compared with preoperatively, with improved Lysholm scores in patients undergoing concomitant HTO versus MMPR repair alone. Meniscal extrusion was not significantly improved after MMPR repair compared with preoperative measurements. The progression in Kellgren-Lawrence grades from grade 0 to grades 1 to 3 occurred in 5.9% (21/354) of patients after repair, with no patients progressing from grades 1 to 3 to grade 4.
Conclusion:
MMPR repair generally improved biomechanical outcomes and led to improved patient–reported outcomes with greater improvements noted in patients undergoing concomitant HTO. Repair did not significantly improve meniscal extrusion, while only 5.9% of patients were noted to progress to low–grade osteoarthritis. The high level of heterogeneity in the included biomechanical and clinical investigations emphasizes the need for more well–designed studies that evaluate outcomes after MMPR repair.
AhnJHJeongHJLeeYS, et al. Comparison between conservative treatment and arthroscopic pull–out repair of the medial meniscus root tear and analysis of prognostic factors for the determination of repair indication. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(9):1265-1276.
2.
AllaireRMuriukiMGilbertsonLHarnerCD. Biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus: similar to total meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(9):1922-1931.
3.
BaeJYParkKSSeonJK, et al. Biomechanical analysis of the effects of medial meniscectomy on degenerative osteoarthritis. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2012;50(1):53-60.
4.
BernardCDKennedyNITaglieroAJ, et al. Medial meniscus posterior root tear treatment: a matched cohort comparison of nonoperative management, partial meniscectomy, and repair. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(1):128-132.
5.
BhatiaSLaPradeCMEllmanMBLaPradeRF. Meniscal root tears: significance, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(12):3016-3030.
6.
BinSIKimJMShinSJ. Radial tears of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(4):373-378.
7.
BrophyRHWojahnRDLillegravenOLamplotJD. Outcomes of arthroscopic posterior medial meniscus root repair: association with body mass index. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(3):104-111.
8.
ChangPSRadtkeLWardPBrophyRH. Midterm outcomes of posterior medial meniscus root tear repair: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. Published online March29, 2021. doi: 10.1177/0363546521998297
9.
ChoJHSongJG. Second-look arthroscopic assessment and clinical results of modified pull–out suture for posterior root tear of the medial meniscus. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2014;26(2):106-113.
10.
ChungKSHaJKRaHJKimJG. A meta–analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes of posterior horn medial meniscus root repairs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(5):1455-1468.
11.
ChungKSHaJKRaHJKimJG. Preoperative varus alignment and postoperative meniscus extrusion are the main long–term predictive factors of clinical failure of meniscal root repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(12):4122-4130.
12.
ChungKSHaJKRaHJKimJG. Prognostic factors in the midterm results of pullout fixation for posterior root tears of the medial meniscus. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(7):1319-1327.
13.
ChungKSHaJKRaHJNamGWKimJG. Pullout fixation of posterior medial meniscus root tears: correlation between meniscus extrusion and midterm clinical results. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(1):42-49.
14.
ChungKSHaJKRaHJYuWJKimJG. Root repair versus partial meniscectomy for medial meniscus posterior root tears: comparison of long–term survivorship and clinical outcomes at minimum 10–year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(8):1937-1944.
15.
ChungKSHaJKYeomCH, et al. Comparison of clinical and radiologic results between partial meniscectomy and refixation of medial meniscus posterior root tears: a minimum 5–year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(10):1941-1950.
16.
CollinsNJMisraDFelsonDTCrossleyKMRoosEM. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score physical function short form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm knee scoring scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner activity score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(suppl 11):S208-S228.
17.
DaiWYanWLengX, et al. Comparative efficacy of root repair versus partial meniscectomy and observation for patients with meniscus root tears. J Knee Surg. Published online May1, 2021. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729622
18.
DaneyBTAmanZSKrobJJ, et al. Utilization of transtibial centralization suture best minimizes extrusion and restores tibiofemoral contact mechanics for anatomic medial meniscal root repairs in a cadaveric model. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(7):1591-1600.
19.
EdwardsCGoldmanBHTurleyJ, et al. Outcomes after surgical repair of medial meniscal root tears: a review. J Knee Surg. 2021;34(14):1599-1602.
20.
FaucettSCGeislerBPChahlaJ, et al. Meniscus root repair vs meniscectomy or nonoperative management to prevent knee osteoarthritis after medial meniscus root tears: clinical and economic effectiveness. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(3):762-769.
21.
FurumatsuTMiyazawaSFujiiM, et al. Arthroscopic scoring system of meniscal healing following medial meniscus posterior root repair. Int Orthop. 2019;43(5):1239-1245.
22.
FurumatsuTOkazakiYHiranakaT, et al. An MRI-based suspension bridge sign can predict an arthroscopically favorable meniscal healing following the medial meniscus posterior root repair. J Orthop Sci. 2021;26(2):237-242.
23.
FurumatsuTOkazakiYKodamaY, et al. Pullout repair using modified Mason-Allen suture induces better meniscal healing and superior clinical outcomes: a comparison between two surgical methods. Knee. 2019;26(3):653-659.
24.
FurumatsuTOkazakiYOkazakiY, et al. Injury patterns of medial meniscus posterior root tears. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(1):107-111.
25.
HaJKShimJCKimDW, et al. Relationship between meniscal extrusion and various clinical findings after meniscus allograft transplantation. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(12):2448-2455.
26.
HanSBShettyGMLeeDH, et al. Unfavorable results of partial meniscectomy for complete posterior medial meniscus root tear with early osteoarthritis: a 5- to 8–year follow–up study. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(10):1326-1332.
27.
HeinCNDeperioJGEhrensbergerMTMarzoJM. Effects of medial meniscal posterior horn avulsion and repair on meniscal displacement. Knee. 2011;18(3):189-192.
28.
HiranakaTFurumatsuTKamatsukiY, et al. The distance between the tibial tunnel aperture and meniscal root attachment is correlated with meniscal healing status following transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tear. Knee. 2020;27(3):899-905.
29.
HiranakaTFurumatsuTMasudaS, et al. A repair technique using two simple stitches reduces the short–term postoperative medial meniscus extrusion after pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tear. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020;30(5):901-908.
30.
HiranakaTFurumatsuTMiyazawaS, et al. Comparison of the clinical outcomes of transtibial pull–out repair for medial meniscus posterior root tear: two simple stitches versus modified Mason-Allen suture. Knee. 2020;27(3):701-708.
31.
HwangBYKimSJLeeSW, et al. Risk factors for medial meniscus posterior root tear. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(7):1606-1610.
32.
JiangEXEverhartJSAbouljoudM, et al. Biomechanical properties of posterior meniscal root repairs: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(7):2189-2206.e2.
33.
JingLLiuKWangX, et al. Second-look arthroscopic findings after medial open–wedge high tibial osteotomy combined with all–inside repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020;28(1):2309499019888836.
34.
KamatsukiYFurumatsuTHiranakaT, et al. Placement of an anatomic tibial tunnel significantly improves the medial meniscus posterior extrusion at 90° of knee flexion following medial meniscus posterior root pullout repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(4):1025-1034.
35.
KamatsukiYFurumatsuTMiyazawaS, et al. The early arthroscopic pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear is more effective for reducing medial meniscus extrusion. Acta Med Okayama. 2019;73(6):503-510.
36.
KeXQiuJChenS, et al. Concurrent arthroscopic meniscal repair during open–wedge high tibial osteotomy is not clinically beneficial for medial meniscus posterior root tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(3):955-965.
37.
KimCWLeeCRGwakHC, et al. Clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients with lax healing after medial meniscal root repair: comparison with subtotal meniscectomy. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(11):3079-3086.
38.
KimJGLeeYSBaeTS, et al. Tibiofemoral contact mechanics following posterior root of medial meniscus tear, repair, meniscectomy, and allograft transplantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(9):2121-2125.
39.
KimJHChungJHLeeDH, et al. Arthroscopic suture anchor repair versus pullout suture repair in posterior root tear of the medial meniscus: a prospective comparison study. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(12): 1644-1653.
40.
KimKIBaeJKJeonSWKimGB. Medial meniscus posterior root tear does not affect the outcome of medial open–wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(2):423-428.
41.
KimSBHaJKLeeSW, et al. Medial meniscus root tear refixation: comparison of clinical, radiologic, and arthroscopic findings with medial meniscectomy. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(3):346-354.
42.
KodamaYFurumatsuTOkazakiY, et al. Transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears: effects on the meniscus healing score and ICRS grade among patients with mild osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(9):3001-3009.
43.
KohYGMoonHKKimYC, et al. Comparison of medial and lateral meniscal transplantation with regard to extrusion of the allograft, and its correlation with clinical outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94(2):190-193.
44.
KrychAJJohnsonNRWuITSmithPAStuartMJ. A simple cinch is superior to a locking loop for meniscus root repair: a human biomechanical comparison of suture constructs in a transtibial pull–out model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(8):2239-2244.
45.
KwonSWKimJBKimCH, et al. Comparison of medial and lateral tibial tunnel in pullout repair of posterior root tear of medial meniscus: radiologic, clinical, and arthroscopic outcomes. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020;28(2):2309499020918759.
46.
LaPradeCMFoadASmithSD, et al. Biomechanical consequences of a nonanatomic posterior medial meniscal root repair. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(4):912-920.
47.
LaPradeCMLaPradeMDTurnbullTLWijdicksCALaPradeRF. Biomechanical evaluation of the transtibial pull–out technique for posterior medial meniscal root repairs using 1 and 2 transtibial bone tunnels. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(4):899-904.
48.
LaPradeRFMathenyLMMoultonSGJamesEWDeanCS. Posterior meniscal root repairs: outcomes of an anatomic transtibial pull–out technique. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(4):884-891.
49.
LeeDWJangHGLeeYJ, et al. Effect of atelocollagen on the healing status after medial meniscal root repair using the modified Mason-Allen stitch. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020;106(5):969-975.
50.
LeeDWKimMKJangHSHaJKKimJG. Clinical and radiologic evaluation of arthroscopic medial meniscus root tear refixation: comparison of the modified Mason-Allen stitch and simple stitches. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(11):1439-1446.
51.
LeeDWLeeSHKimJG. Outcomes of medial meniscal posterior root repair during proximal tibial osteotomy: is root repair beneficial?Arthroscopy. 2020;36(9):2466-2475.
52.
LeeJHLimYJKimKBKimKHSongJH. Arthroscopic pullout suture repair of posterior root tear of the medial meniscus: radiographic and clinical results with a 2–year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(9):951-958.
53.
LeeSSAhnJHKimJHKyungBSWangJH. Evaluation of healing after medial meniscal root repair using second–look arthroscopy, clinical, and radiological criteria. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(11): 2661-2668.
54.
MannanAWalmsleyKSchranzPMandaliaV. Staged meniscal allograft transplantation as a biologic treatment of the meniscal deficient knee: a prospective case series of 26 patients with maximum 88–month follow-up. Knee. 2020;27(5):1370-1377.
55.
MarzoJMGurske-DePerioJ. Effects of medial meniscus posterior horn avulsion and repair on tibiofemoral contact area and peak contact pressure with clinical implications. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(1):124-129.
56.
MasudaSFurumatsuTOkazakiY, et al. Transtibial pullout repair reduces posterior extrusion of the medial meniscus. Acta Med Okayama. 2019;73(6):495-501.
57.
MitchellRPittsRKimYMMatavaMJ. Medial meniscal root avulsion: a biomechanical comparison of 4 different repair constructs. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(1):111-119.
58.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; the PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
59.
MoonHKKohYGKimYC, et al. Prognostic factors of arthroscopic pull–out repair for a posterior root tear of the medial meniscus. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(5):1138-1143.
60.
MoonHSChoiCHJungM, et al. Early surgical repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear minimizes the progression of meniscal extrusion: 2–year follow–up of clinical and radiographic parameters after arthroscopic transtibial pull–out repair. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(11):2692-2702.
61.
MoonHSChoiCHYooJH, et al. Mild to moderate varus alignment in relation to surgical repair of a medial meniscus root tear: a matched–cohort controlled study with 2 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(4):1005-1016.
62.
NakamaGYAmanZSStoraciHW, et al. Different suture materials for arthroscopic transtibial pull–out repair of medial meniscal posterior root tears: a human biomechanical study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7(9):2325967119873274.
63.
NovarettiJVAsturDCCavalcanteELB, et al. Preoperative meniscal extrusion predicts unsatisfactory clinical outcomes and progression of osteoarthritis after isolated partial medial meniscectomy: a 5–year follow–up study. J Knee Surg. Published online August24, 2020. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715109
64.
OkazakiYFurumatsuTHiranakaT, et al. Two simple stitches for medial meniscus posterior root repair prevents the progression of meniscal extrusion and reduces intrameniscal signal intensity better than modified Mason-Allen sutures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021;31(6):1005-1013.
65.
OkazakiYFurumatsuTKodamaY, et al. Steep posterior slope and shallow concave shape of the medial tibial plateau are risk factors for medial meniscus posterior root tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(1):44-50.
66.
OkazakiYFurumatsuTKodamaY, et al. Transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear restores physiological rotation of the tibia in the knee–flexed position. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(1):113-117.
67.
OkazakiYFurumatsuTMasudaS, et al. Pullout repair of the medial meniscus posterior root tear reduces proton density–weighted imaging signal intensity of the medial meniscus. Acta Med Okayama. 2018;72(5):493-498.
68.
OkazakiYFurumatsuTOkazakiY, et al. Medial meniscus posterior root repair decreases posteromedial extrusion of the medial meniscus during knee flexion. Knee. 2020;27(1):132-139.
69.
OkazakiYFurumatsuTYamauchiT, et al. Medial meniscus posterior root repair restores the intra–articular volume of the medial meniscus by decreasing posteromedial extrusion at knee flexion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(11):3435-3442.
70.
OzkocGCirciEGoncU, et al. Radial tears in the root of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(9):849-854.
71.
PadaleckiJRJanssonKSSmithSD, et al. Biomechanical consequences of a complete radial tear adjacent to the medial meniscus posterior root attachment site: in situ pull–out repair restores derangement of joint mechanics. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(3): 699-707.
72.
PapaliaRVastaSFranceschiF, et al. Meniscal root tears: from basic science to ultimate surgery. Br Med Bull. 2013;106:91-115.
73.
PašaLKužmaJHerůfekR, et al. Meniscus transplantation: prospective assessment of clinical results in two, five and ten year follow-up. Int Orthop. 2021;45(4):941-957.
74.
RoKHKimJHHeoJWLeeDH. Clinical and radiological outcomes of meniscal repair versus partial meniscectomy for medial meniscus root tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(11):2325967120962078.
75.
SaltzmanBMHabetNARaoAJ, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of an all–inside posterior medial meniscal root repair technique via suture fixation to the posterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(9):2488-2497.e6.
76.
SamuelsenBTAmanZSKennedyMI, et al. Posterior medial meniscus root tears potentiate the effect of increased tibial slope on anterior cruciate ligament graft forces. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(2):334-340.
77.
SeoHSLeeSCJungKA. Second-look arthroscopic findings after repairs of posterior root tears of the medial meniscus. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(1):99-107.
78.
UlkuTKKayaAKocaogluB. Suture configuration techniques have no effect on mid–term clinical outcomes of arthroscopic meniscus root repairs. Knee. 2020;27(3):676-682.
79.
WhiWParkJYChoiH, et al. Predicting outcome of repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear with early osteoarthritis using bone single–photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(27):e21047.
80.
YanagisawaSKimuraMHagiwaraKOgoshiA. Association between postoperative meniscal extrusion and clinical outcomes of the pullout fixation technique for medial meniscus posterior root tear. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2020;21:27-31.
81.
ZhangXFurumatsuTOkazakiY, et al. High body mass index is a risk factor for unfavorable clinical outcomes after medial meniscus posterior root repair in well–aligned knees. J Orthop Sci. 2021; 26(3):430-434.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
