Athletes who compete in flexibility sports (FS) place unique demands on their hip joints because of the supraphysiologic range of motion required.
Purpose:
To compare the pathologic features, outcomes, and return-to-sports (RTS) rates of high-level athletes participating in FS who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and labral tear against a propensity score–matched cohort of high-level athletes participating in non–flexibility sports (NFS).
Study Design:
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed for high-level athletes who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS from April 2008 to December 2018. Patients who participated in FS such as dancing, gymnastics, martial arts, figure skating, and cheerleading were propensity score matched by body mass index, age at time of surgery, sex, sports competition level, and labral treatment to a cohort of high-level athletes participating in all other sports, such as distance running, soccer, volleyball, and softball. Baseline patient characteristics, intraoperative findings, and surgical procedures were compared. Minimum 2-year patient-reported outcome measures were compared for the modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score–Sport Specific Subscale, and visual analog scale for pain and satisfaction. Rates of secondary surgery and RTS were compared.
Results:
A total of 47 patients (50 hips) who participated in FS were included and propensity score matched to 130 patients (150 hips) who participated in NFS. Follow-up time was 37.5 ± 10.4 months (mean ± SD). Most patients (96.0%) were female with a mean age of 19.5 ± 7.3 years. FS athletes had significantly higher rates of femoral head cartilage lesions (Outerbridge ≥2; 12.0% vs 2.0%; P = .008) and ligamentum teres tears (48% vs 26%; P = .003). FS and NFS athletes demonstrated significant clinical improvements after surgery for all patient-reported outcome measures. Of the patients who attempted, 34 (75.6%) participating in FS were able to RTS while 11 (24.4%) were not because of ongoing hip issues. This was not significantly different than the NFS group (P = .073).
Conclusion:
High-level athletes who participated in FS and were treated for FAIS with hip arthroscopy exhibited higher rates of femoral head cartilage lesions and ligamentum teres tears requiring debridement when compared with a benchmark group of athletes who participated in other sports. Despite this, both groups demonstrated similar improvements in outcome scores and comparable rates of RTS at minimum 2-year follow-up.
AngioiMMaffulliGDMcCormackMMorrisseyDChanOMaffulliN. Early signs of osteoarthritis in professional ballet dancers: a preliminary study. Clin J Sport Med. 2014;24(5):435-437. doi:10.1097/jsm.0000000000000035
2.
ApratoAJayasekeraNVillarRN. Does the modified Harris Hip Score reflect patient satisfaction after hip arthroscopy?Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(11):2557-2560. doi:10.1177/0363546512460650
3.
AshbergLCharharbakhshiEOPeretsIYuenLCWalshJPDombBG. Hip arthroscopic surgery with labral preservation and capsular plication in patients with borderline hip dysplasia: minimum 5-year patient-reported outcomes: response. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(4):NP32-NP33. doi:10.1177/0363546519825641
4.
AustinPC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2011;10(2):150-161. doi:10.1002/pst.433
5.
AustinPC. Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations. Biom J. 2009;51(1):171-184. doi:10.1002/bimj.200810488
6.
BoliaIUtsunomiyaHLocksRBriggsKPhilipponMJ. Twenty-year systematic review of the hip pathology, risk factors, treatment, and clinical outcomes in artistic athletes—dancers, figure skaters, and gymnasts. Clin J Sport Med. 2018;28(1):82-90. doi:10.1097/JSM.00 00000000000440
7.
BoliaIKIhnHKangHP, et al. Cutting, impingement, contact, endurance, flexibility, and asymmetric/overhead sports: is there a difference in return-to-sport rate after arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(5):1363-1371. doi:10.1177/0363546520950441
8.
BonazzaNAHomchaBLiuGLeslieDLDhawanA. Surgical trends in arthroscopic hip surgery using a large national database. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(6):1825-1830. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.022
9.
CallaghanJJRosenbergAGRubashHE. The Adult Hip. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
10.
ChahlaJSoaresEAMDevittBM, et al. Ligamentum teres tears and femoroacetabular impingement: prevalence and preoperative findings. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(7):1293-1297. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2016 .01.045
11.
ChahalJThielGSVMatherRCLeeSSalataMJNhoSJ. The minimal clinical important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for the modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score among patients undergoing surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014;2(2)(suppl):23259 67114S00105. doi:10.1177/2325967114S00105
12.
ChandrasekaranSVemulaSPMartinTJSuarez-AhedoCLodhiaPDombBG. Arthroscopic technique of capsular plication for the treatment of hip instability. Arthrosc Tech. 2015;4(2):e163-e167. doi:10.1016/j.eats.2015.01.004
13.
CharbonnierCKoloFCDuthonVB, et al. Assessment of congruence and impingement of the hip joint in professional ballet dancers: a motion capture study. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(3):557-566. doi:10.1177/0363546510386002
14.
ChenSLMaldonadoDRGoCCKyinCLallACDombBG. Outcomes of hip arthroscopic surgery in adolescents with a subanalysis on return to sport: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(6):1526-1534. doi:10.1177/0363546519875131
15.
ChonaDVBonanoJCAyeniORSafranMR. Definitions of return to sport after hip arthroscopy: are we speaking the same language and are we measuring the right outcome?Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(9):2325967120952990. doi:10.1177/2325967120952990
16.
ChristensenCPAlthausenPLMittlemanMALeeJMcCarthyJC. The Nonarthritic Hip Score: reliable and validated. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;406:75-83. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000043047.84315.4b
17.
CoteMPLubowitzJHBrandJCRossiMJ. Misinterpretation of P values and statistical power creates a false sense of certainty: statistical significance, lack of significance, and the uncertainty challenge. Arthroscopy. 2021;37(4):1057-1063. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2021 .02.010
18.
DietrichFRiesCEiermannCMiehlkeWSobauC. Complications in hip arthroscopy: necessity of supervision during the learning curve. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(4):953-958. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-2893-9
19.
DombBGChaharbakhshiEORybalkoDCloseMRLitrentaJPeretsI. Outcomes of hip arthroscopic surgery in patients with Tönnis grade 1 osteoarthritis at a minimum 5-year follow-up: a matched-pair comparison with a Tönnis grade 0 control group. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(10):2294-2302. doi:10.1177/0363546517706957
20.
DombBGChenSLGoCC, et al. Predictors of clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy: 5-year follow-up analysis of 1038 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(1):112-120. doi:10.1177/036354652 0968896
21.
DombBGHartiganDEPeretsI. Decision making for labral treatment in the hip: repair versus débridement versus reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(3):e53-e62.
DombBGMartinTJGuiCChandrasekaranSSuarez-AhedoCLodhiaP. Predictors of clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy: a prospective analysis of 1038 patients with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(6):1324-1330. doi:10.1177/0363546518763362
24.
DombBGPhilipponMJGiordanoBD. Arthroscopic capsulotomy, capsular repair, and capsular plication of the hip: relation to atraumatic instability. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(1):162-173. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.057
25.
DuthonVBCharbonnierCKoloFC, et al. Correlation of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings in hips of elite female ballet dancers. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(3):411-419. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2012 .10.012
26.
DyCJThompsonMTCrawfordMJAlexanderJWMcCarthyJCNoblePC. Tensile strain in the anterior part of the acetabular labrum during provocative maneuvering of the normal hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(7):1464-1472. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.00467
27.
GriffinDRDickensonEJWallPDH, et al. Hip arthroscopy versus best conservative care for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (UK FASHIoN): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10136):2225-2235. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31202-9
28.
GriffinDRParsonsNMohtadiNGHSafranMR; Multicenter Arthroscopy of the Hip Outcomes Research Network. A short version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) for use in routine clinical practice. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(5):611-616. doi:10.1016/j.art hro.2012.02.027
29.
GuptaAChandrasekaranSRedmondJM, et al. Does labral size correlate with degree of acetabular dysplasia?Orthop J Sports Med. 2015;3(2):2325967115572573. doi:10.1177/232596711557 2573
30.
GuptaARedmondJMHammarstedtJEStakeCELiuYDombBG. Arthroscopic decompression of central acetabular impingement with notchplasty. Arthrosc Tech. 2014;3(5):e555-e558. doi:10.1016/j.eats.2014.06.006
31.
HaleRFMeluginHPZhouJ, et al. Incidence of femoroacetabular impingement and surgical management trends over time. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(1):35-41. doi:10.1177/0363546520970914
32.
HanSAlexanderJWThomasVS, et al. Does capsular laxity lead to microinstability of the native hip?Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(6):1315-1323. doi:10.1177/0363546518755717
33.
HassebrockJDMakovickaJLChhabraA, et al. Hip arthroscopy in the high-level athlete: does capsular closure make a difference?Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(10):2465-2470. doi:10.1177/036354652 0936255
34.
HoppeDJde SaDSimunovicN, et al. The learning curve for hip arthroscopy: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(3):389-397. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2013.11.012
35.
JohannsenAMBehnAWShibataKEjnismanLThioTSafranMR. The role of anterior capsular laxity in hip microinstability: a novel biomechanical model. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(5):1151-1158. doi:10.1177/0363546519827955
36.
JohannsenAMEjnismanLBehnAWShibataKThioTSafranMR. Contributions of the capsule and labrum to hip mechanics in the context of hip microinstability. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7(12): 2325967119890846. doi:10.1177/2325967119890846
37.
KalisvaartMMSafranMR. Microinstability of the hip—it does exist: etiology, diagnosis and treatment. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015;2(2):123-135. doi:10.1093/jhps/hnv017
38.
KaneLTFangTGalettaMS, et al. Propensity score matching: a statistical method. Clin Spine Surg. 2020;33(3):120-122. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000932
39.
KyinCMaldonadoDRGoCCShapiraJLallACDombBG. Mid- to long-term outcomes of hip arthroscopy: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2021;37(3):1011-1025. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2020 .10.001
40.
LallACAnninSChenJW, et al. Achieving a perfectly spherical femoroplasty: pearls, pitfalls, and optimal surgical technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2020;9(3):e303-e313. doi:10.1016/j.eats.2019.10.011
41.
LarsonCMRossJRGiveansMRMcGaverRSWeedKNBediA. The dancer’s hip: the hyperflexible athlete—anatomy and mean 3-year arthroscopic clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(3):725-731. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.023
42.
LindmanIÖhlinADesaiN, et al. Five-year outcomes after arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in elite athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(6):1416-1422. doi:10.1177/0363546520908840
43.
LodhiaPGuiCMartinTJChandrasekaranSSuarez-AhedoCDombBG. Central acetabular impingement is associated with femoral head and ligamentum teres damage: a cross-sectional matched-pair analysis of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral tears. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(1):135-143. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.254
44.
MaldonadoDRChenJWYeltonMJ, et al. Achieving successful outcomes of hip arthroscopy in the setting of generalized ligamentous laxity with labral preservation and appropriate capsular management: a propensity matched controlled study. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(7):1625-1635. doi:10.1177/0363546520914604
45.
MaldonadoDRChenSLWalker-SantiagoR, et al. An intact ligamentum teres predicts a superior prognosis in patients with borderline dysplasia: a matched-pair controlled study with minimum 5-year outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(3):673-681. doi:10.1177/0363546519898716
46.
MaldonadoDRKyinCShapiraJ, et al. Defining the maximum outcome improvement of the modified Harris Hip Score, the Nonarthritic Hip Score, the visual analogue scale for pain, and the International Hip Outcome Tool–12 in the arthroscopic management for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral tear. Arthroscopy. 2021;37(5):1477-1485. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.002
47.
MaldonadoDRLaseterJRPeretsI, et al. The effect of complete tearing of the ligamentum teres in patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears: a match-controlled study. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(1):80-88. doi:10.10 16/j.arthro.2018.07.042
48.
MaldonadoDRRosinskyPJShapiraJDombBG. Stepwise safe access in hip arthroscopy in the supine position: tips and pearls from A to Z. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28(16):651-659. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00856
49.
MartinRLPhilipponMJ. Evidence of validity for the Hip Outcome Score in hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(8):822-826. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.02.004
50.
Mas MartinezJSanz-ReigJVerdu RomanCBustamante Suarez de PugaDMartinez GimenezEMorales SantiasM. Recreational sports and intra-articular hip injuries in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020;2(4):e321-e328. doi:10.1016/j.asmr.2020.04.005
51.
MayesSFerrisARSmithPGarnhamACookJ. Atraumatic tears of the ligamentum teres are more frequent in professional ballet dancers than a sporting population. Skeletal Radiol. 2016;45(7):959-967. doi:10.1007/s00256-016-2379-6
52.
MengeTJBriggsKKDornanGJMcNamaraSCPhilipponMJ. Survivorship and outcomes 10 years following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: labral debridement compared with labral repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(12):997-1004. doi:10.2106/JBJS.16.01060
53.
MitchellRJGerrieBJMcCullochPC, et al. Radiographic evidence of hip microinstability in elite ballet. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(6):1038-1044.e1. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2015.12.049
54.
NawabiDHBediATiborLMMagennisEKellyBT. The demographic characteristics of high-level and recreational athletes undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a sports-specific analysis. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(3):398-405. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2013.12.010
55.
NormanGRSloanJAWyrwichKW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41(5):582-592. doi:10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C
56.
NötzliHPWyssTFStoecklinCHSchmidMRTreiberKHodlerJ. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(4):556-560.
57.
NwachukwuBUChangBBeckEC, et al. How should we define clinically significant outcome improvement on the iHOT-12?HSS J. 2019;15(2):103-108. doi:10.1007/s11420-018-9646-0
58.
Ortiz-DecletVMuBChenAW, et al. The “bird’s eye” and “upper deck” views in hip arthroscopy: powerful arthroscopic perspectives for acetabuloplasty. Arthrosc Tech. 2018;7(1):e13-e16. doi:10.1016/j.eats.2017.08.051
59.
OuterbridgeRE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43:752-757.
60.
PapavasiliouASiatrasTBintoudiA, et al. The gymnasts’ hip and groin: a magnetic resonance imaging study in asymptomatic elite athletes. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43(8):1071-1077. doi:10.1007/s00256-014-1885-7
61.
PhilipponMJSchenkerML. Athletic hip injuries and capsular laxity. Oper Tech Orthop. 2005;15(3):261-266. doi:10.1053/j.oto.2005.07.001
62.
RedmondJMGuptaADunneKHumayunAYuenLCDombBG. What factors predict conversion to THA after arthroscopy?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(10):2538-2545.
63.
RedmondJMGuptaAHammarstedtJEStakeCEDunneKFDombBG. Labral injury: radiographic predictors at the time of hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(1):51-56. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.002
64.
RosinskyPJAnninSMaldonadoDR, et al. Arthroscopic ligamentum teres reconstruction: minimum 2-year patient reported outcomes with sub-analysis of patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(8):2170-2182. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.028
65.
SafranMR. Microinstability of the hip—gaining acceptance. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(1):12-22. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00664
66.
SeldesRMTanVHuntJKatzMWiniarskyRFitzgeraldRH. Anatomy, histologic features, and vascularity of the adult acetabular labrum. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;382:232-240.
67.
ShibataKRMatsudaSSafranMR. Arthroscopic hip surgery in the elite athlete: comparison of female and male competitive athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(8):1730-1739. doi:10.1177/0363546517697296
68.
UkwuaniGCWatermanBRNwachukwuBU, et al. Return to dance and predictors of outcome after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(4):1101-1108.e3. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.121
69.
WamperKESiereveltINPoolmanRWBhandariMHaverkampD. The Harris Hip Score: do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics?Acta Orthop. 2010;81(6):703-707. doi:10.3109/17453674.2010.537808
70.
WeberAEBediATiborLMZaltzILarsonCM. The hyperflexible hip: managing hip pain in the dancer and gymnast. Sports Health. 2015;7(4):346-358. doi:10.1177/1941738114532431
71.
WibergG. Shelf operation in congenital dysplasia of the acetabulum and in subluxation and dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1953;35(1):65-80.
