Posterior Tibial Loading Results in Significant Increase of Peak Contact Pressure in the Patellofemoral Joint During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study

Abstract

Background:

Inappropriate posterior tibial loading and initial graft tension during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction may cause altered patellofemoral joint (PFJ) contact mechanics, potentially resulting in pain and joint degeneration.

Hypothesis:

PFJ contact pressure would increase with the increases in posterior tibial loading and graft tension during ACL reconstruction.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

Nine fresh-frozen, nonpaired human cadaveric knees were tested in a customized jig from 0° to 120° of knee flexion. First, the knee was tested in the ACL-intact state. Second, reconstruction of the ACLs using different posterior tibial loadings and graft tensions were performed. The posterior tibial loading was evaluated at 2 levels: 33.5 and 67 N. Graft tension was assessed at 3 levels: low tension (20 N), medium tension (60 N), and high tension (80 N). Maximum values of peak contact pressure in the medial and lateral patellar facets were compared between ACL-intact and ACL-reconstructed knees. The PFJ kinematics between ACL-intact knees and ACL-reconstructed knees were compared during knee flexion at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°.

Results:

Reconstruction of ACLs with both low and high posterior tibial loading resulted in significant increases of peak contact pressure in the medial (range of differences, 0.46-0.92 MPa; P < .05) and lateral (range of differences, 0.51-0.83 MPa; P < .05) PFJ compared with the ACL-intact condition. However, no significant differences in PFJ kinematics were identified between ACL-reconstructed knees and ACL-intact knees. In ACL-reconstructed knees, it was found that a high posterior tibial loading resulted in high peak contact pressure on the medial patellar side (range of differences, 0.37-0.46 MPa; P < .05). No significant difference in peak contact pressure was observed among the differing graft tensions.

Conclusion:

In this cadaveric model, ACL reconstruction resulted in significant increases of peak contact pressure in the PFJ facet when compared with the ACL-intact condition. A high posterior tibial loading can lead to high medial PFJ peak contact pressure. Graft tension was found to not significantly affect PFJ contact pressure during ACL reconstruction.

Clinical Relevance:

An excessive posterior tibial loading during ACL reconstruction resulted in increased PFJ contact pressures at time of surgery. These data suggest that a low posterior tibial loading might be preferred during ACL reconstruction surgery to reduce the PFJ contact pressure close to that of the ACL-intact condition.

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patellofemoral joint posterior tibial loading graft tension biomechanics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amis

Jakob

. Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6(suppl 1):S2-S12.

Amis

Senavongse

Bull

. Patellofemoral kinematics during knee flexion-extension: an in vitro study. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(12):2201-2211.

Arnold

Verdonschot

van Kampen

. The normal anterior cruciate ligament as a model for tensioning strategies in anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(2):277-283.

Bedi

Maak

Musahl

, et al. Effect of tibial tunnel position on stability of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the tibial tunnel position most important? Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(2):366-373.

Brady

Bradley

Fleming

, et al. Effects of initial graft tension on the tibiofemoral compressive forces and joint position after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(3):395-403.

Farahmand

Tahmasbi

Amis

. Lateral force–displacement behaviour of the human patella and its variation with knee flexion—a biomechanical study in vitro. J Biomech. 1998;31(12):1147-1152.

Fleming

Fadale

Hulstyn

, et al. The effect of initial graft tension after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial with 36-month follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(1):25-34.

Grood

Suntay

. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. 1983;105(2):136-144.

Hoher

Kanamori

Zeminski

Woo

. The position of the tibia during graft fixation affects knee kinematics and graft forces for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(6):771-776.

10.

Kim

S-G

Kurosawa

Sakuraba

Ikeda

Takazawa

. The effect of initial graft tension on postoperative clinical outcome in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;126(4):260-264.

11.

Kirwan

Bourke

Chipchase

Dalton

Russell

. Graft tensioning practices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction amongst orthopaedic surgeons in Australia: a national survey. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(12):1733-1741.

12.

Koh

Y-G

Nam

J-H

Chung

H-S

, et al. Gender-related morphological differences in sulcus angle and condylar height for the femoral trochlea using magnetic resonance imaging. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(11):3560-3566.

13.

DeFrate

Zayontz

Park

Gill

. The effect of tibiofemoral joint kinematics on patellofemoral contact pressures under simulated muscle loads. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(4):801-806.

14.

Mae

Shino

Nakata

, et al. Optimization of graft fixation at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part II: effect of knee flexion angle. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(6):1094-1100.

15.

Melby

III A

Noble

Askew

Boom

Hurst

. The effects of graft tensioning on the laxity and kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knee. Arthroscopy. 1991;7(3):257-266.

16.

Nicholas

D’Amato

Mullaney

, et al. A prospectively randomized double-blind study on the effect of initial graft tension on knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1881-1886.

17.

Rood

Hannink

Lenting

, et al. Patellofemoral pressure changes after static and dynamic medial patellofemoral ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(10):2538-2544.

18.

Sakai

Luo

Rand

. The influence of weakness in the vastus medialis oblique muscle on the patellofemoral joint: an in vitro biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000;15(5):335-339.

19.

Shalhoub

Maletsky

. Variation in patellofemoral kinematics due to changes in quadriceps loading configuration during in vitro testing. J Biomech. 2014;47(1):130-136.

20.

Stephen

Alva

Lumpaopong

Williams

Amis

. A cadaveric model to evaluate the effect of unloading the medial quadriceps on patellar tracking and patellofemoral joint pressure and stability. J Exp Orthop. 2018;5(1):1-10.

21.

Stephen

Dodds

Lumpaopong

, et al. The ability of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction to correct patellar kinematics and contact mechanics in the presence of a lateralized tibial tubercle. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(9):2198-2207.

22.

Stephen

Kader

Lumpaopong

Deehan

Amis

. Sectioning the medial patellofemoral ligament alters patellofemoral joint kinematics and contact mechanics. J Orthop Res. 2013;31(9):1423-1429.

23.

Van de Velde

Gill

DeFrate

Papannagari

. The effect of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency and reconstruction on the patellofemoral joint. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(6):1150-1159.

24.

Verhulst

van Sambeeck

Olthuis

van der Ree

Koëter

. Patellar height measurements: Insall–Salvati ratio is most reliable method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(3):869-875.

25.

Zhang

Huang

Yao

, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries alter the kinematics of knees with or without meniscal deficiency. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(12):3132-3139.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.70 MB