Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is a well-known treatment that restores the stability of ACL-deficient knees. However, some isolated ACL-reconstructed knees ultimately show rotatory laxity and develop osteoarthritis. Whether combined ACLR with anterolateral structure (ALS) augmentation (ALSA) can provide better improvement in the in vivo knee rotational kinematics remains unknown.
Hypothesis:
When compared with isolated double-bundle ACLR, combined double-bundle ACLR with ALSA can improve knee in vivo rotational kinematics and provide better restoration of knee kinematics.
Study Design:
Controlled laboratory study.
Methods:
Sixteen patients with unilateral ACL injury were randomly divided into 2 groups to receive either combined double-bundle ACLR and ALSA (ALSA group) or isolated double-bundle ACLR (ACLR group). All patients performed a single-leg lunge using the operative and nonoperative/contralateral legs under dual-fluoroscopic imaging system surveillance during a hospital visit at a minimum 1 year (12-13 months) of follow-up to assess the 6 degrees of freedom knee kinematics. Functional evaluation using the Lysholm and Marx rating scales and clinical examinations were also performed.
Results:
From full extension to approximately 90° of knee flexion at 5° intervals, the mean ± SD internal rotation of the reconstructed knees in the ALSA group (1.5°± 0.9°) was significantly smaller than that of the contralateral knees (8.2°± 1.9°; P = .008). The ALSA group knees also showed significantly (P = .045) more medial translation than the contralateral knees. In the ACLR group, the mean internal rotation of the reconstructed knee (6.0°± 2.1°) was significantly smaller than that of the contralateral knees (8.9°± 0.6°; P < .001). At full extension, the tibia was significantly more externally rotated than that of the contralateral legs (0.5°± 7.4° vs 7.6°± 3.4°, P = .049).
Conclusion:
When compared with isolated double-bundle ACLR, double-bundle ACLR augmented with ALS reconstruction resulted in anterolateral rotatory overconstraint during the lunge motion.
Clinical Relevance:
Additional ALSA of double-bundle ACL-reconstructed knees overconstrained rotatory stability. Therefore, the use of ALSA for ACL-reconstructed knees should be considered with caution for patients with ACL deficiency and anterolateral rotatory instability. Longer-term follow-up to evaluate long-term outcomes and altered kinematics over time is recommended.
AkpinarBThorhauerEIrrgangJJTashmanSFuFHAnderstWJ.Alteration of knee kinematics after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is dependent on associated meniscal injury. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(5):1158-1165.
2.
Ariel de LimaDHelitoCPLacerdadeLimaLde Castro SilvaDCosta CavalcanteMLDias LeiteJA.Anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of the knee: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(2):670-681.
3.
BediAMaakTMusahlV, et al. Effect of tunnel position and graft size in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an evaluation of time-zero knee stability. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(11):1543-1551.
4.
BranchTLavoieFGuierC, et al. Single-bundle ACL reconstruction with and without extra-articular reconstruction: evaluation with robotic lower leg rotation testing and patient satisfaction scores. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(10):2882-2891.
5.
BrockmeyerMOrthPHoferD, et al. The anatomy of the anterolateral structures of the knee—a histologic and macroscopic approach. Knee. 2019;26(3):636-646.
6.
ButlerRJMinickKIFerberRUnderwoodF.Gait mechanics after ACL reconstruction: implications for the early onset of knee osteoarthritis. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(5):366-370.
7.
BynumEBBarrackRLAlexanderAH.Open versus closed chain kinetic exercises after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(4):401-406.
8.
CarvalhoLHJrTemponiEFSoaresLFGonçalvesMJ.Relationship between range of motion and femoral rollback in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2014;48(1):1-5.
9.
ChambatPGuierCSonnery-CottetBFayardJMThaunatM.The evolution of ACL reconstruction over the last fifty years. Int Orthop. 2013;37(2):181-186.
10.
ChouliarasVRistanisSMoraitiCStergiouNGeorgoulisAD.Effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with quadrupled hamstrings and bone–patellar tendon–bone autografts: an in vivo study comparing tibial internal-external rotation. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(2):189-196.
11.
CinqueMEDornanGJChahlaJMoatsheGLaPradeRF.High rates of osteoarthritis develop after anterior cruciate ligament surgery: an analysis of 4108 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(8):2011-2019.
12.
CronstromAAgebergEFranettovich SmithMMBlackmoreTNaeJCreabyMW.Factors affecting knee abduction during weight-bearing activities in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther Sport. 2019;38:8-15.
13.
DefrateLEPapannagariRGillTJMosesJMPathareNPLiG.The 6 degrees of freedom kinematics of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: an in vivo imaging analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(8):1240-1246.
14.
DenewethJMBeyMJMcLeanSGLockTRKolowichPATashmanS.Tibiofemoral joint kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament–reconstructed knee during a single-legged hop landing. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(9):1820-1828.
15.
DevittBMBouguennecNBarfodKWPorterTWebsterKEFellerJA.Combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and lateral extra-articular tenodesis does not result in an increased rate of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(4):1149-1160.
16.
GalvinCRPerrimanDMNewmanPMLynchJTSmithPNScarvellJM.Squatting, lunging and kneeling provided similar kinematic profiles in healthy knees—a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on deep knee flexion kinematics. Knee. 2018;25(4):514-530.
17.
GetgoodABrownCLordingT, et al. The anterolateral complex of the knee: results from the International ALC Consensus Group Meeting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(1):166-176.
18.
GetgoodAMJBryantDMLitchfieldR, et al. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis reduces failure of hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 2-year outcomes from the STABILITY Study Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(2):285-297.
19.
HeftiFMüllerWJakobRStäubliH.Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993;1(3-4):226-234.
20.
HelitoCPCamargoDBSobradoMF, et al. Combined reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament in chronic ACL injuries leads to better clinical outcomes than isolated ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(12):3652-3659.
21.
HelitoCPSobradoMFGiglioPN, et al. Combined reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury and ligamentous hyperlaxity leads to better clinical stability and a lower failure rate than isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(9):2648-2654.
22.
HofbauerMThorhauerEDAbebeEBeyMTashmanS.Altered tibiofemoral kinematics in the affected knee and compensatory changes in the contralateral knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(11):2715-2721.
23.
HorvathAMeredithSJNishidaKHoshinoYMusahlV.Objectifying the pivot shift test. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2020;28(2):36-40.
24.
HoshinoYFuFHIrrgangJJTashmanS.Can joint contact dynamics be restored by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(9):2924-2931.
25.
IbrahimSAShohdyEMMarwanY, et al. Anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee with or without reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(7):1558-1566.
26.
ImhauserCWSheikhSChoiDSNguyenJTMauroCSWickiewiczTL.Novel measure of articular instability based on contact stress confirms that the anterior cruciate ligament is a critical stabilizer of the lateral compartment. J Orthop Res. 2016;34(3):478-488.
27.
InderhaugEStephenJMEl-DaouHWilliamsAAmisAA.The effects of anterolateral tenodesis on tibiofemoral contact pressures and kinematics. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(13):3081-3088.
28.
IriuchishimaTShirakuraKHoraguchiTMorimotoYFuFH.Rollback of the femoral condyle in anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;20(5):941-946.
29.
KaiserJMVignosMFKijowskiRBaerGThelenDG.Effect of loading on in vivo tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics of healthy and ACL-reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(14):3272-3279.
30.
KatakuraMKogaHNakamuraT, et al. Biomechanical effects of additional anterolateral structure reconstruction with different femoral attachment sites on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(14):3373-3380.
31.
KennedyJCStewartRWalkerDM.Anterolateral rotatory instability of the knee joint: an early analysis of the Ellison procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(8):1031-1039.
32.
KennedyMIClaesSFusoFA, et al. The anterolateral ligament: an anatomic, radiographic, and biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1606-1615.
33.
KernkampWAVan de VeldeSKHosseiniA, et al. In vivo anterolateral ligament length change in the healthy knee during functional activities—a combined magnetic resonance and dual fluoroscopic imaging analysis. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(1):133-139.
34.
KernkampWAVan de VeldeSKTsaiTY, et al. An in vivo simulation of isometry of the anterolateral aspect of the healthy knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(13):1111-1118.
35.
KimHYKimKJYangDSJeungSWChoiHGChoyWS.Screw-home movement of the tibiofemoral joint during normal gait: three-dimensional analysis. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015;7(3):303-309.
36.
KozanekMHosseiniAVan de VeldeSK, et al. Kinematic evaluation of the step-up exercise in anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011;26(9):950-954.
37.
KozanekMHosseiniALiuF, et al. Tibiofemoral kinematics and condylar motion during the stance phase of gait. J Biomech. 2009;42(12):1877-1884.
38.
KraemerHCKupferDJ.Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;59(11):990-996.
39.
LeeDWKimJGChoSIKimDH.Clinical outcomes of isolated revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or in combination with anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(2):324-333.
40.
LiGPapannagariRNhaKWDefrateLEGillTJRubashHE.The coupled motion of the femur and patella during in vivo weightbearing knee flexion. J Biomech Eng. 2007;129(6):937-943.
41.
LieMMRisbergMAStorheimKEngebretsenLOiestadBE.What’s the rate of knee osteoarthritis 10 years after anterior cruciate ligament injury? An updated systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(18):1162-1167.
42.
LutzC.Role of anterolateral reconstruction in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018;104(1):S47-S53.
43.
LutzCSonnery-CottetBNiglisLFreychetBClavertPImbertP.Behavior of the anterolateral structures of the knee during internal rotation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(5):523-528.
44.
MatsuoTMaeTShinoK, et al. Tibiofemoral relationship following anatomic triple-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;22(9):2128-2135.
45.
MonacoELabiancaLConteducaFDe CarliAFerrettiA.Double bundle or single bundle plus extraarticular tenodesis in ACL reconstruction? A CAOS study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(10):1168-1174.
46.
MonacoEMaestriBConteducaFMazzaDIorioCFerrettiA.Extra-articular ACL reconstruction and pivot shift: in vivo dynamic evaluation with navigation. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(7):1669-1674.
47.
NishidaKMatsushitaTHoshinoY, et al. The influences of chronicity and meniscal injuries on pivot shift in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(5):1398-1406.
48.
NitriMRasmussenMTWilliamsBT, et al. An in vitro robotic assessment of the anterolateral ligament, part 2: anterolateral ligament reconstruction combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(3):593-601.
49.
PapannagariRGillTJDefrateLEMosesJMPetruskaAJLiG.In vivo kinematics of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a clinical and functional evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(12):2006-2012.
50.
ParkinsonBGognaRRobbCThompsonPSpaldingT.Anatomic ACL reconstruction: the normal central tibial footprint position and a standardised technique for measuring tibial tunnel location on 3D CT. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(5):1568-1575.
51.
ParkinsonBRobbCThomasMThompsonPSpaldingT.Factors that predict failure in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(7):1529-1536.
52.
ParsonsEMGeeAOSpiekermanCCavanaghPR.The biomechanical function of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(3):669-674.
53.
RaoZZhouCKernkampWAFosterTEBedairHSLiG.In vivo kinematics and ligamentous function of the knee during weight-bearing flexion: an investigation on mid-range flexion of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(3):797-805.
54.
ReiderB.ACL or ACL+. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(2):281-284.
55.
RobbinsSMRaymondNAbramFPelletierJPMartel-PelletierJ.The effect of alignment on knee osteoarthritis initiation and progression differs based on anterior cruciate ligament status: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38(12): 3557-3566.
56.
RosenstielNPrazCOuanezarH, et al. Combined anterior cruciate and anterolateral ligament reconstruction in the professional athlete: clinical outcomes from the Scientific Anterior Cruciate Ligament Network International Study Group in a series of 70 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(3):885-892.
57.
SaragagliaDLeroyJMDe SousaBTourneYAbualZahabM.Medium-term results of 173 ligamentoplasties of the anterior cruciate ligament using the MacIntosh technique reinforced by the Kennedy ligament augmentation device (LAD). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1995;3(2):68-74.
58.
SchonJMMoatsheGBradyAW, et al. Anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction of the knee leads to overconstraint at any fixation angle. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(10):2546-2556.
59.
SeoSSKimCWLeeCR, et al. Effect of femoral tunnel position on stability and clinical outcomes after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the outside-in technique. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(6):1648-1655.
60.
SeonJKSongEKBaeBH, et al. Kinematic study following double-bundle, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop. 2006;31(5):623-628.
61.
SongGYHongLZhangHZhangJLiYFengH.Clinical outcomes of combined lateral extra-articular tenodesis and intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in addressing high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(5):898-905.
62.
SongGYZhangHWuG, et al. Patients with high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon are associated with higher prevalence of anterolateral ligament injury after acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(4):1111-1116.
63.
Sonnery-CottetBDaggettMFayardJM, et al. Anterolateral Ligament Expert Group consensus paper on the management of internal rotation and instability of the anterior cruciate ligament–deficient knee. J Orthop Traumatol. 2017;18(2):91-106.
64.
Sonnery-CottetBSaithnaACavalierM, et al. Anterolateral ligament reconstruction is associated with significantly reduced ACL graft rupture rates at a minimum follow-up of 2 years: a prospective comparative study of 502 patients from the SANTI Study Group. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(7):1547-1557.
65.
Sonnery-CottetBThaunatMFreychetBPupimBHMurphyCGClaesS.Outcome of a combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction technique with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1598-1605.
66.
StrumGMFoxJMFerkelRD, et al. Intraarticular versus intraarticular and extraarticular reconstruction for chronic anterior cruciate ligament instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;245:188-198.
67.
TakedaYSatoROgawaTFujiiKNaruseA.In vivo magnetic resonance imaging measurement of tibiofemoral relation with different knee flexion angles after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(7):733-741.
68.
TanakaMVyasDMoloneyGBediAPearleADMusahlV.What does it take to have a high-grade pivot shift?Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(4):737-742.
69.
TashmanSKolowichPCollonDAndersonKAnderstW.Dynamic function of the ACL-reconstructed knee during running. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:66-73.
70.
TsaiTYLiowMHLPengYArauzPLiGKwonYM.In-vivo elongation of anterior and posterior cruciate ligament in bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2018;36(12):3239-3246.
71.
UekiHKatagiriHOtabeK, et al. Contribution of additional anterolateral structure augmentation to controlling pivot shift in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(9):2093-2101.
72.
Van de VeldeSGillTLiG.Evaluation of kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament–deficient knees with use of advanced imaging techniques, three-dimensional modeling techniques, and robotics. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(suppl 1):108-114.
73.
Van de VeldeSHosseiniAKozánekMGillTRubashHLiG.Application guidelines for dynamic knee joint analysis with a dual fluoroscopic imaging system. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76(1):107-113.
74.
Van de VeldeSKKernkampWAHosseiniALaPradeRFvan ArkelERLiG.In vivo length changes of the anterolateral ligament and related extra-articular reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(10):2557-2562.
75.
WoodRMarshJGetgoodA.Anterolateral complex reconstruction: another fad or method to improve ACL outcomes?Tech Orthop. 2018;33(4):239-245.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
