Posterior Rotational and Translational Stability in Acromioclavicular Ligament Complex Reconstruction: A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis in Cadaveric Specimens

Abstract

Background:

Persistent posterior instability of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint is a reported complication after isolated coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction. Thus, multiple techniques have been proposed attempting to restore biomechanics of the AC ligament complex (ACLC).

Purpose/Hypothesis:

The purpose was to evaluate the posterior translational and rotational stability of an ACLC reconstruction with a dermal allograft (ACLC patch) as compared with 3 suture brace constructs. It was hypothesized that the ACLC patch would better restore AC joint posterior stability.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

A total of 28 cadaveric shoulders (mean ± SD age, 57.6 ± 8.3 years) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 surgical techniques: ACLC patch, oblique brace, anterior brace, and x-frame brace. The force and torque to achieve 10 mm of posterior translation and 20° of posterior rotation of the AC joint were recorded in the following conditions: intact, transected ACLC, ACLC patch/brace repair, ACLC patch/brace repair with dissected CC ligaments, and ACLC patch/brace repair with CC ligament repair.

Results:

For posterior translation, transection of the ACLC reduced resistance to 16.7% of the native. With the native CC ligaments intact, the ACLC patch (59.1%), oblique brace (54.1%), and anterior brace (60.7%) provided significantly greater stability than the x-frame brace (33.2%; P < .001, P = .008, P < .001, respectively). ACLC patch, oblique brace, and anterior brace continued to have significantly higher posterior translational resistance than the x-frame (35.1%; P < .001, P = .003, P < .001) after transection and subsequent CC ligament repair. For posterior rotation, transection of the ACLC decreased the resistance to 5.4% of the intact state. With the CC ligaments intact, the ACLC patch (77.1%) better restored posterior rotational stability than the oblique (35.3%), anterior (48.5%), and x-frame (23.0%) brace repairs (P < .001, P = .002, P < .001). CC ligament transection and subsequent repair demonstrated the ACLC patch (41.0%) to have improved stability when compared with the oblique (16.0%), anterior (14.0%), and x-frame (12.7%) repairs (P = .006, P = .003, P = .002).

Conclusion:

ACLC reconstruction with a dermal allograft better restored native posterior rotational stability than other brace constructs, with translational stability similar to the oblique and anterior brace technique at the time of surgery.

Clinical Relevance:

Horizontal stability of the AC joint is primarily controlled by the ACLC. Inability to restore AC joint biomechanics can result in persistent posterior instability and lead to functional impairment.

Keywords

AC joint biomechanics dermal patch ACLC ACLC patch rotational stability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barth

Duparc

Baverel

, et al. Prognostic factors to succeed in surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular dislocations. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(8):S305-S311.

Beitzel

Cote

Apostolakos

, et al. Current concepts in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(2):387-397.

Beitzel

Obopilwe

Apostolakos

, et al. Rotational and translational stability of different methods for direct acromioclavicular ligament repair in anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(9):2141-2148.

Beitzel

Obopilwe

Chowaniec

, et al. Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic repairs for acromioclavicular joint instability: suture button systems without biological augmentation. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(10):2218-2225.

Beitzel

Sablan

Chowaniec

, et al. Sequential resection of the distal clavicle and its effects on horizontal acromioclavicular joint translation. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(3):681-685.

Braun

Beitzel

Buchmann

Imhoff

AB.

Arthroscopically assisted treatment of acute dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint. Arthrosc Tech. 2015;4(6):e681-e685.

Dawson

Adamson

Pink

, et al. Relative contribution of acromioclavicular joint capsule and coracoclavicular ligaments to acromioclavicular stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(2):237-244.

Debski

Parsons

IV Woo

. Effect of capsular injury on acromioclavicular joint mechanics. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(9):1344-1351.

Dyrna

Imhoff

Haller

, et al. Primary stability of an acromioclavicular joint repair is affected by the type of additional reconstruction of the acromioclavicular capsule. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(14):3471-3479.

10.

Dyrna

FGE

Imhoff

Voss

, et al. The integrity of the acromioclavicular capsule ensures physiological centering of the acromioclavicular joint under rotational loading. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(6):1432-1440.

11.

Fukuda

Craig

Cofield

Chao

. Biomechanical study of the ligamentous system of the acromioclavicular joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(3):434-440.

12.

Inman

Saunders

Abbott

. Observations of the function of the shoulder joint. 1944. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;330:3-12.

13.

Izadpanah

Jaeger

Ogon

Sudkamp

Maier

. Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: anatomic AC ligament reconstruction with protective internal bracing—the “AC-RecoBridge” technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2015;4(2):e153-e161.

14.

Kibler

Sciascia

Morris

Dome

. Treatment of symptomatic acromioclavicular joint instability by a docking technique: clinical indications, surgical technique, and outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(4):696-708.

15.

Maier

Jaeger

Reising

, et al. Injury patterns of the acromioclavicular ligament complex in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: a cross-sectional, fundamental study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):385.

16.

Morikawa

Dyrna

Cote

, et al. Repair of the entire superior acromioclavicular ligament complex best restores posterior translation and rotational stability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(12):3764-3770.

17.

Morikawa

Mazzocca

Obopilwe

, et al. Reconstruction of the acromioclavicular ligament complex using dermal allograft: a biomechanical analysis. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(1):108-115.

18.

Nakazawa

Nimura

Mochizuki

, et al. The orientation and variation of the acromioclavicular ligament: an anatomic study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(10):2690-2695.

19.

Scheibel

Droschel

Gerhardt

Kraus

. Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(7):1507-1516.

20.

Tauber

Valler

Lichtenberg

, et al. Arthroscopic stabilization of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations: triple- versus single-bundle reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(2):482-489.

21.

Weiser

Nuchtern

Sellenschloh

, et al. Acromioclavicular joint dislocations: coracoclavicular reconstruction with and without additional direct acromioclavicular repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(7):2025-2031.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB