Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-12
The Association Between Tibial Slope and Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients ≤21 Years Old: A Matched Case-Control Study Including 317 Revisions
There is evidence that tibial slope may play a role in revision risk after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); however, prior studies are inconsistent.
Purpose:
To determine (1) whether there is a difference in lateral tibial posterior slope (LTPS) or medial tibial posterior slope (MTPS) between patients undergoing revised ACLR and those not requiring revision and (2) whether the medial-to-lateral slope difference is different between these 2 groups.
Study Design:
Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
We conducted a matched case-control study (2006-2015). Cases were patients aged ≤21 years who underwent revision surgery after primary unilateral ACLR; controls were patients aged ≤21 years without revision who were identified from the same source population. Controls were matched to cases by age, sex, body mass index, race, graft type, femoral fixation device, and post-ACLR follow-up time. Tibial slope measurements were made by a single blinded reviewer using magnetic resonance imaging. The Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemar test were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
Results:
No difference was observed between revised and nonrevised ACLR groups for LTPS (median: 6° vs 6°, P = .973) or MTPS (median: 4° vs 5°, P = .281). Furthermore, no difference was found for medial-to-lateral slope difference (median: −1 vs −1, P = .289). A greater proportion of patients with revised ACLR had an LTPS ≥12° (7.6% vs 3.8%) and ≥13° (4.7% vs 1.3%); however, this was not statistically significant after accounting for multiple testing.
Conclusion:
We failed to observe an association between revision ACLR surgery and LTPS, MTPS, or medial-to-lateral slope difference. However, there was a greater proportion of patients in the revision ACLR group with an LTPS ≥12°, suggesting that a minority of patients who have more extreme values of LTPS have a higher revision risk after primary ACLR. A future cohort study evaluating the angle that best differentiates patients at highest risk for revision is needed.
BarrettAMCraftJAReplogleWHHydrickJMBarrettGR. Anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: a comparison of graft type based on age and Tegner activity level. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(10):2194-2198.
2.
BatesNANesbittRJShearnJTMyerGDHewettTE. Posterior tibial slope angle correlates with peak sagittal and frontal plane knee joint loading during robotic simulations of athletic tasks. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(7):1762-1770.
3.
BediAMusahlVSteuberV, et al. Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(3):380-390.
4.
BeynnonBDHallJSSturnickDR, et al. Increased slope of the lateral tibial plateau subchondral bone is associated with greater risk of noncontact ACL injury in females but not in males: a prospective cohort study with a nested, matched case-control analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(5):1039-1048.
5.
BreslowNEDayNE. Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume 1: the analysis of case-control studies. IARC Sci Publ. 1980(32):5-338.
6.
BudaRRuffilliADi CaprioF, et al. Allograft salvage procedure in multiple-revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(2):402-410.
7.
ChalmersPNMallNAMoricM, et al. Does ACL reconstruction alter natural history? A systematic literature review of long-term outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(4):292-300.
8.
ChenJLAllenCRStephensTE, et al. Differences in mechanisms of failure, intraoperative findings, and surgical characteristics between single- and multiple-revision ACL reconstructions: a MARS cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(7):1571-1578.
9.
ChristensenJJKrychAJEngasserWMVanheesMKCollinsMSDahmDL. Lateral tibial posterior slope is increased in patients with early graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(10):2510-2514.
10.
CotterEJHannonCPLockerP, et al. Male sex, decreased activity level, and higher BMI associated with lower completion of patient-reported outcome measures following ACL reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(3):2325967118758602.
11.
DareDMFabricantPDMcCarthyMM, et al. Increased lateral tibial slope is a risk factor for pediatric anterior cruciate ligament injury: an MRI-based case-control study of 152 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1632-1639.
12.
FaschingbauerMSgroiMJuchemsMReichelHKappeT. Can the tibial slope be measured on lateral knee radiographs?Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(12):3163-3167.
13.
FeuchtMJMauroCSBruckerPUImhoffABHinterwimmerS. The role of the tibial slope in sustaining and treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(1):134-145.
14.
FlemingBCRenstromPABeynnonBD, et al. The effect of weightbearing and external loading on anterior cruciate ligament strain. J Biomech. 2001;34(2):163-170.
15.
HashemiJChandrashekarNMansouriH, et al. Shallow medial tibial plateau and steep medial and lateral tibial slopes: new risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(1):54-62.
16.
HolmS. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6(2):65-70.
17.
JaeckerVDrouvenSNaendrupJHKanakamedalaACPfeifferTShafizadehS. Increased medial and lateral tibial posterior slopes are independent risk factors for graft failure following ACL reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018;138(10):1423-1431.
18.
KaedingCCArosBPedrozaA, et al. Allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: predictors of failure from a MOON prospective longitudinal cohort. Sports Health. 2011;3(1):73-81.
19.
KaedingCCPedrozaADReinkeEKHustonLJSpindlerKP. Risk factors and predictors of subsequent ACL injury in either knee after ACL reconstruction: prospective analysis of 2488 primary ACL reconstructions from the MOON cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1583-1590.
KamienPMHydrickJMReplogleWHGoLTBarrettGR. Age, graft size, and Tegner activity level as predictors of failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(8):1808-1812.
22.
KarterAJFerraraALiuJYMoffetHHAckersonLMSelbyJV. Ethnic disparities in diabetic complications in an insured population. JAMA. 2002;287(19):2519-2527.
23.
KhanMSSeonJKSongEK. Risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury: assessment of tibial plateau anatomic variables on conventional MRI using a new combined method. Int Orthop. 2011;35(8):1251-1256.
24.
KoebnickCLanger-GouldAMGouldMK, et al. Sociodemographic characteristics of members of a large, integrated health care system: comparison with US Census Bureau data. Perm J. 2012;16(3):37-41.
25.
LeeCCYoumYSChoSD, et al. Does posterior tibial slope affect graft rupture following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?Arthroscopy. 2018;34(7):2152-2155.
26.
LiYHongLFengHWangQZhangHSongG. Are failures of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction associated with steep posterior tibial slopes? A case control study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(14):2649-2653.
27.
LiechtiDJChahlaJDeanCS, et al. Outcomes and risk factors of rerevision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(10):2151-2159.
28.
LindMMenhertFPedersenAB. Incidence and outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish registry for knee ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(7):1551-1557.
29.
MagnussenRALawrenceJTWestRLTothAPTaylorDCGarrettWE. Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(4):526-531.
30.
MagnussenRAMansourAACareyJLSpindlerKP. Meniscus status at anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction associated with radiographic signs of osteoarthritis at 5- to 10-year follow-up: a systematic review. J Knee Surg. 2009;22(4):347-357.
31.
MaletisGBInacioMCDesmondJLFunahashiTT. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: association of graft choice with increased risk of early revision. Bone Joint J. 2013;95(5):623-628.
32.
MaletisGBInacioMCFunahashiTT. Analysis of 16,192 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from a community-based registry. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(9):2090-2098.
33.
MaletisGBInacioMCReynoldsSDesmondJLMaletisMMFunahashiTT. Incidence of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction infections: graft choice makes a difference. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(8):1780-1785.
34.
MariscalcoMWFlaniganDCMitchellJ, et al. The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(12):1948-1953.
35.
MarkolfKLBurchfieldDMShapiroMMShepardMFFinermanGASlauterbeckJL. Combined knee loading states that generate high anterior cruciate ligament forces. J Orthop Res. 1995;13(6):930-935.
36.
McNemarQ. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika. 1947;12(2):153-157.
37.
PaxtonEWNambaRSMaletisGB, et al. A prospective study of 80,000 total joint and 5000 anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in a community-based registry in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(suppl 2):117-132.
38.
PimentelSDKelzRRSilberJHRosenbaumPR. Large, sparse optimal matching with refined covariate balance in an observational study of the health outcomes produced by new surgeons. J Am Stat Assoc. 2015;110(510):515-527.
39.
RosenbaumPR. Design of Observational Studies. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2010.
40.
RosenbaumPRRossRNSilberJH. Minimum distance matched sampling with fine balance in an observational study of treatment for ovarian cancer. J Am Stat Assoc. 2007;102(477):75-83.
41.
RubinDM. Bias reduction using Mahalanobis-metric matching. Biometrics. 1980;36:293-298.
42.
SalmonLJHeathEAkrawiHRoeJPLinklaterJPinczewskiLA. 20-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: the catastrophic effect of age and posterior tibial slope. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(3):531-543.
43.
SauerSEnglishRClatworthyM. The ratio of tibial slope and meniscal bone angle for the prediction of ACL reconstruction failure risk. Surg J (N Y). 2018;4(3):e152-e159.
44.
SchillhammerC. Editorial commentary: managing excessive posterior slope in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Where do we draw the line?Arthroscopy. 2018;34(7):2156-2157.
45.
ShelbourneKDGrayT. Minimum 10-year results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how the loss of normal knee motion compounds other factors related to the development of osteoarthritis after surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(3):471-480.
SimJAGadikotaHRLiJSLiGGillTJ. Biomechanical evaluation of knee joint laxities and graft forces after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by anteromedial portal, outside-in, and transtibial techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(12):2604-2610.
48.
SimonRAEverhartJSNagarajaHNChaudhariAM. A case-control study of anterior cruciate ligament volume, tibial plateau slopes and intercondylar notch dimensions in ACL-injured knees. J Biomech. 2010;43(9):1702-1707.
49.
SmallDSChengJHalloranMERosenbaumPR. Case definition and design sensitivity. J Am Stat Assoc. 2013;108(504):1457-1468.
50.
StijakLHerzogRFSchaiP. Is there an influence of the tibial slope of the lateral condyle on the ACL lesion? A case-control study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(2):112-117.
51.
SturnickDRVacekPMDeSarnoMJ, et al. Combined anatomic factors predicting risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury for males and females. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(4):839-847.
52.
van DiekFMWolfMRMurawskiCDvan EckCFFuFH. Knee morphology and risk factors for developing an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: an MRI comparison between ACL-ruptured and non-injured knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(5):987-994.
53.
van EckCFSchkrohowskyJGWorkingZMIrrgangJJFuFH. Prospective analysis of failure rate and predictors of failure after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(4):800-807.
54.
WangYLYangTZengC, et al. Association between tibial plateau slopes and anterior cruciate ligament injury: a meta-analysis. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(6):1248-1259.e1244.
55.
WebbJMSalmonLJLeclercEPinczewskiLARoeJP. Posterior tibial slope and further anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament–reconstructed patient. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(12):2800-2804.
56.
WeinbergDSWilliamsonDFGebhartJJKnapikDMVoosJE. Differences in medial and lateral posterior tibial slope: an osteological review of 1090 tibiae comparing age, sex, and race. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(1):106-113.
57.
WilcoxonF. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin. 1945;1(6):80-83.
58.
WordemanSCQuatmanCEKaedingCCHewettTE. In vivo evidence for tibial plateau slope as a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(7):1673-1681.
59.
YangDSmallDSSilberJHRosenbaumPR. Optimal matching with minimal deviation from fine balance in a study of obesity and surgical outcomes. Biometrics. 2012;68(2):628-636.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
