The Glenoid Concavity Shape Is Insufficient to Challenge the Concept of Critical Cutoff Value of Glenoid Bone Loss in Clinical Practice: Response

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Burkhart

De Beer

. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:677-694.

Kim

Park

Chun

. Arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent shoulder instability with moderate glenoid bone defect in patients with moderate to low functional demand. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:921-927.

Moroder

Plachel

Huettner

et al . The effect of scapula tilt and best-fit circle placement when measuring glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability patients. Arthroscopy. 2018;34:398-404.

Nofsinger

Browning

Burkhart

Pedowitz

. Objective preoperative measurement of anterior glenoid bone loss: a pilot study of a computer-based method using unilateral 3-dimensional computed tomography. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:322-329.

Shaha

Cook

Song

et al . Redefining “critical” bone loss in shoulder instability: functional outcomes worsen with “subcritical” bone loss. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:1719-1725.

Yamamoto

Itoi

Abe

et al . Effect of an anterior glenoid defect on anterior shoulder stability: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:949-954.