The Glenoid Concavity Shape Is Insufficient to Challenge the Concept of Critical Cutoff Value of Glenoid Bone Loss in Clinical Practice: Letter to the Editor
Restricted accessLetterFirst published online July, 2019
The Glenoid Concavity Shape Is Insufficient to Challenge the Concept of Critical Cutoff Value of Glenoid Bone Loss in Clinical Practice: Letter to the Editor
ItoiE. “On-track” and “off-track” shoulder lesions. EFORT Open Rev. 2017;2:343-351.
2.
LippittSBVanderhooftJEHarrisSLSidlesJAHarrymanDTMatsenFA. Glenohumeral stability from concavity-compression: a quantitative analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1993;2:27-35.
3.
MatsenFAHarrymanDTSidlesJA. Mechanics of glenohumeral instability. Clin Sports Med. 1991;10:783-788.
4.
MoroderPDammPWiererGet al. Challenging the current concept of critical glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability: does the size measurement really tell it all?Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(3):688-694.
5.
MoroderPErnstbrunnerLPomwengerWet al. Anterior shoulder instability is associated with an underlying deficiency of the bony glenoid concavity. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:1223-1231.
6.
ShahaJSCookJBSongDJet al. Redefining “critical” bone loss in shoulder instability: functional outcomes worsen with “subcritical” bone loss. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:1719-1725.
7.
YamamotoNItoiEAbeHet al. Effect of an anterior glenoid defect on anterior shoulder stability: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:949-954.
8.
YamamotoNMurakiTSperlingJWet al. Stabilizing mechanism in bone-grafting of a large glenoid defect. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2059-2066.
