Extracellular Matrix Cartilage Allograft and Particulate Cartilage Allograft for Osteochondral Lesions of the Knee and Ankle Joints: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Background:

Extracellular matrix cartilage allografts (EMCAs) and particulate cartilage allografts (PCAs) are relatively new biologics that may improve the quality of cartilage regeneration after bone marrow stimulation. The increasing popularity of these novel biologics in the treatment of osteochondral lesions (OCLs) of the knee and ankle joints prompts a systematic evaluation of their efficacies.

Purpose:

The purpose of this systematic review was to clarify the effectiveness of EMCAs and PCAs on cartilage regeneration.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, IV.

Methods:

Two reviewers searched MEDLINE and Embase in February 2016 based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Predetermined variables from each study were extracted and analyzed.

Results:

For EMCAs, 1 in vitro study and 2 clinical studies for OCLs of the ankle joint were found. For PCAs, 3 in vitro studies, 5 clinical studies for OCLs of the knee joint, and 5 clinical studies for OCLs of the ankle joint were found. For all studies, in vitro chondrogenesis and clinical outcomes favored EMCAs and PCAs. However, the highest level of evidence was IV, and the methodological quality of evidence was indicated to be poor.

Conclusion:

Both EMCAs and PCAs have yielded favorable outcomes in both in vitro and clinical studies. However, the available studies were of limited data with significant confounding factors. Therefore, it is unclear whether the effectiveness of these novel biologics is any greater than that of bone marrow stimulation alone in the repair of knee and ankle cartilage.

Keywords

allograft ankle biologics cartilage regeneration cartilage repair knee

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adkisson

Martin

Amendola

et al . The potential of human allogeneic juvenile chondrocytes for restoration of articular cartilage. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(7):1324-1333.

Adkisson

Milliman

Zhang

Mauch

Maziarz

Streeter

PR.

Immune evasion by neocartilage-derived chondrocytes: implications for biologic repair of joint articular cartilage. Stem Cell Res. 2010;4(1):57-68.

Asik

Ciftci

Sen

Erdil

Atalar

The microfracture technique for the treatment of full-thickness articular cartilage lesions of the knee: midterm results. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(11):1214-1220.

Bleazey

Brigido

SA.

Reconstruction of complex osteochondral lesions of the talus with cylindrical sponge allograft and particulate juvenile cartilage graft: provisional results with a short-term follow-up. Foot Ankle Spec. 2012;5(5):300-305.

Bonasia

Martin

Marmotti

et al . Cocultures of adult and juvenile chondrocytes compared with adult and juvenile chondral fragments: in vitro matrix production. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(11):2355-2361.

Buckwalter

Bowman

Albright

Wolf

Bollier

Clinical outcomes of patellar chondral lesions treated with juvenile particulated cartilage allografts. Iowa Orthop J. 2014;34:44-49.

Chadha

Dang

Sampson

et al . Porous cartilage-derived matrix scaffolds for repair of articular cartilage defects. Available at: http://www.ors.org/Transactions/58/0735.pdf. Accessed February 27, 2016.

Cheng

Estes

Awad

Guilak

Chondrogenic differentiation of adipose-derived adult stem cells by a porous scaffold derived from native articular cartilage extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15(2):231-241.

Choi

Park

Kim

Lee

JW.

Osteochondral lesion of the talus: is there a critical defect size for poor outcome?

Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(10):1974-1980.

10.

Chuckpaiwong

Berkson

Theodore

GH.

Microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the ankle: outcome analysis and outcome predictors of 105 cases. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(1):106-112.

11.

Coetzee

Giza

Schon

et al . Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with particulated juvenile cartilage. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(9):1205-1211.

12.

Deng

Jin

Zhao

Cartilage defect treatments: with or without cells? Mesenchymal stem cells or chondrocytes? Traditional or matrix-assisted? A systematic review and meta-analyses. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:9201492.

13.

Desai

Surgical treatment of a tibial osteochondral defect with debridement, marrow stimulation, and micronized allograft cartilage matrix: report of an all-arthroscopic technique. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55(2):279-282.

14.

Desai

Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with marrow stimulation and micronized allograft cartilage matrix: an all-arthroscopic technique. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;13(3):167-173.

15.

Drakos

Murphy

Particulated juvenile articular cartilage allograft transplantation with bone marrow aspirate concentrate for treatment of talus osteochondral defects. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;14(2):88-93.

16.

Farr

Tabet

Margerrison

Cole

BJ.

Clinical, radiographic, and histological outcomes after cartilage repair with particulated juvenile articular cartilage: a 2-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(6):1417-1425.

17.

Farr

Yao

JQ.

Chondral defect repair with particulated juvenile cartilage allograft. Cartilage. 2011;2(4):346-353.

18.

Furukawa

Eyre

Koide

Glimcher

MJ.

Biochemical studies on repair cartilage resurfacing experimental defects in the rabbit knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(1):79-89.

19.

Giza

Howell

Allograft juvenile articular cartilage transplantation for treatment of talus osteochondral defects. Foot Ankle Spec. 2013;6(2):141-144.

20.

Goldring

SR.

Alterations in periarticular bone and cross talk between subchondral bone and articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. Ther Adv Musculoskel Dis. 2012;4(4):249-258.

21.

Hjertquist

Lemperg

Histological, autoradiographic and microchemical studies of spontaneously healing osteochondral articular defects in adult rabbits. Calcif Tissue Res. 1971;8(1):54-72.

22.

Kruse

Paden

Stone

PA.

Arthroscopic De Novo NT(®) juvenile allograft cartilage implantation in the talus: a case presentation. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51(2):218-221.

23.

Liberati

Altman

Tetzlaff

et al . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):W65-W94.

24.

Liu

Zhao

Clarke

Gao

Garrett

Margerrison

EE.

Enhanced tissue regeneration potential of juvenile articular cartilage. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(11):2658-2667.

25.

Mitchell

Shepard

The resurfacing of adult rabbit articular cartilage by multiple perforations through the subchondral bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(2):230-233.

26.

Mithoefer

Williams

3rd Warren

et al . Chondral resurfacing of articular cartilage defects in the knee with the microfracture technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(1 Suppl 2):294-304.

27.

Moher

Cook

Jadad

et al . Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(12):i-iv, 1-98.

28.

Moher

Jadad

Klassen

TP.

Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews, III: how did the authors synthesize the data and make their conclusions?

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:915-920.

29.

Murawski

Kennedy

JG.

Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(11):1045-1054.

30.

Pan

Wang

et al . Elevated cross-talk between subchondral bone and cartilage in osteoarthritic joints. Bone. 2012;51(2):212-217.

31.

Ross

Hannon

Deyer

et al . Functional and MRI outcomes after arthroscopic microfracture for treatment of osteochondral lesions of the distal tibial plafond. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(20):1708-1715.

32.

Sackett

Rosenberg

Gray

Haynes

Richardson

WS.

Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71-72.

33.

Saxena

Eakin

Articular talar injuries in athletes: results of microfracture and autogenous bone graft. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(10):1680-1687.

34.

Shapiro

Koide

Glimcher

MJ.

Cell origin and differentiation in the repair of full-thickness defects of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(4):532-553.

35.

Skalska

Burakowski

Janicka

et al . Chondrogenic and osteogenic potential of adipose derived stem cells from RA and OA patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:A25.

36.

Stevens

Shockley

Willett

et al . Particulated juvenile articular cartilage implantation in the knee: a 3-year EPIC-µCT and histological examination. Cartilage. 2014;5(2):74-77.

37.

Tompkins

Hamann

Diduch

et al . Preliminary results of a novel single-stage cartilage restoration technique: particulated juvenile articular cartilage allograft for chondral defects of the patella. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(10):1661-1670.

38.

Wells

Shea

O’Connell

et al . Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2012. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed February 22, 2016.

39.

Witteveen

AGH

Hofstad

Kerkhoffs

GMMJ

. Hyaluronic acid and other conservative treatment options for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(10):CD010643.

40.

Wright

Swiontkowski

Heckman

JD.

Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(1):1-3.

41.

Zengerink

Struijs

Tol

van Dijk

CN.

Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(2):238-246.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB