Optimal fixation of soft tissue grafts in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains a controversial topic, and tibial-sided fixation is frequently cited as the “weak point” of the femur-graft-tibia construct. Some studies have recommended the use of hybrid fixation (combining intratunnel aperture fixation and extracortical suspensory fixation) on the tibial side to increase the strength of the reconstructed ACL and decrease the risk of graft slippage and subsequent failure. However, no consensus has emerged on the necessity or suitability of this technique, relative to single modes of fixation.
Purpose:
This study sought answers to the following questions: (1) Does hybrid fixation result in stronger, stiffer initial fixation of soft tissue grafts? (2) Does hybrid fixation reduce side-to-side laxity differences in clinical practice? (3) Does hybrid fixation increase complication rates when compared with a single mode of tibial fixation?
Study Design:
Systematic review.
Methods:
A systematic keyword search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews, and the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews was performed. Candidate articles were included if they compared biomechanical or clinical characteristics of tibial-sided hybrid fixation (defined as a combination of aperture and suspensory fixation methods) with single-mode fixation of soft tissue grafts in ACL reconstruction.
Results:
A total of 21 studies (15 biomechanical, 6 clinical) met criteria for inclusion. Most biomechanical studies reported significantly increased strength and stiffness with hybrid fixation versus single modes of fixation. Among clinical studies, 66% reported significantly decreased anterior-posterior laxity when hybrid fixation methods were employed, with the remainder showing no difference.
Conclusion:
Hybrid methods of tibial-sided graft fixation in ACL reconstruction result in stronger initial fixation and less side-to-side laxity after healing but do not change patient-reported outcomes at 1- to 3-year follow-up.
Registration:
PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews No. 42014015464.
BeckerRSchroderMRopkeMStarkeCNebelungW. Structural properties of sutures used in anchoring multistranded hamstrings in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(3):297-300.
2.
BiauDJKatsahianSKartusJ. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(12):2470-2478.
3.
BizziniMGorelickMMunzingerUDrobnyT. Joint laxity and isokinetic thigh muscle strength characteristics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone patellar tendon bone versus quadrupled hamstring autografts. Clin J Sport Med. 2006;16(1):4-9.
4.
BrandJJrHamiltonDSelbyJPienkowskiDCabornDNJohnsonDL. Biomechanical comparison of quadriceps tendon fixation with patellar tendon bone plug interference fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2000;16(8):805-812.
5.
BrandJJrWeilerACabornDNBrownCHJrJohnsonDL. Graft fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(5):761-774.
6.
BrandJCJrCabornDNJohnsonDL. Biomechanics of soft-tissue interference screw fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2003;26(4):432-439.
7.
BrandJCJrPienkowskiDSteenlageEHamiltonDJohnsonDLCabornDN. Interference screw fixation strength of a quadrupled hamstring tendon graft is directly related to bone mineral density and insertion torque. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(5):705-710.
8.
ColemanSGalloRKompelJPurnellGAltmanG. A low-profile method of hybrid tibial fixation for soft tissue grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2009;32(4). doi: 10.3928/01477447-20090401-01.
9.
CorryISWebbJMClingelefferAJPinczewskiLA. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27(4):444-454.
10.
De WallMScholesCJPatelSCoolicanMRParkerDA. Tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study comparing metal interference screw and staples with a centrally placed polyethylene screw and sheath. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(9):1858-1864.
11.
DelincePGhafilD. Anterior cruciate ligament tears: conservative or surgical treatment? A critical review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(1):48-61.
12.
FabbricianiCMulasPDZiranuFDeriuLZarelliDMilanoG. Mechanical analysis of fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft: an experimental study in sheep knees. Knee. 2005;12(2):135-138.
13.
FellerJAWebsterKE. A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(4):564-573.
14.
GiureaMZorillaPAmisAAAichrothP. Comparative pull-out and cyclic-loading strength tests of anchorage of hamstring tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27(5):621-625.
15.
HarveyAThomasNPAmisAA. Fixation of the graft in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(5):593-603.
16.
HillPFRussellVJSalmonLJPinczewskiLA. The influence of supplementary tibial fixation on laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons in female patients. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(1):94-101.
17.
HowellSMRoosPHullML. Compaction of a bone dowel in the tibial tunnel improves the fixation stiffness of a soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament graft: an in vitro study in calf tibia. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(5):719-725.
18.
IshibashiYRudyTWLivesayGAStoneJDFuFHWooSL. The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation site at the tibia on knee stability: evaluation using a robotic testing system. Arthroscopy. 1997;13(2):177-182.
19.
JarvinenTLAlamiGBKarlssonJ. Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation: a myth busted?Arthroscopy. 2010;26(5):681-684.
20.
JohnsonLL. The outcome of a free autogenous semitendinosus tendon graft in human anterior cruciate reconstructive surgery: a histological study. Arthroscopy. 1993;9(2):131-142.
21.
KimMKNaSILeeJMParkJY. Comparison of bioabsorbable suture anchor fixation on the tibial side for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using free soft tissue graft: experimental laboratory study on porcine bone. Yonsei Med J. 2014;55(3):760-765.
22.
KleinSANylandJKocabeyYWozniakTNawabACabornDN. Tendon graft fixation in ACL reconstruction: in vitro evaluation of bioabsorbable tenodesis screw. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75(1):84-88.
23.
KocabeyYNawabANylandJIsikanUECabornD. Soft tissue tendon graft fixation in the tibial tunnel with a bioabsorbable screw-EndoPearl combination in tibiae of low bone mineral density: a biomechanical study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2004;38(4):282-287.
24.
KousaPJarvinenTLVihavainenMKannusPJarvinenM. The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: part II. Tibial site. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(2):182-188.
25.
KurosakaMYoshiyaSAndrishJT. A biomechanical comparison of different surgical techniques of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1987;15(3):225-229.
26.
LeeJJOtarodifardKJunBJMcGarryMHHatchGF3rdLeeTQ. Is supplementary fixation necessary in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions?Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(2):360-365.
27.
LenschowSHerbortMStrasserA. Structural properties of a new device for graft fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction: the shim technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(8):1067-1072.
28.
LimCTTanKJChuanAK. Clinical stability and outcome of supplementing tibial fixation with a staple for ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Curr Orthop Pract. 2009;20(6):660-664.
29.
Liu-BarbaDHowellSMHullML. High-stiffness distal fixation restores anterior laxity and stiffness as well as joint line fixation with an interference screw. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(12):2073-2082.
30.
LupettiEGorettiCColombelliABelluatiAFlaccoB. When and why do our ACL reconstructions fail? Analysis of the causes and treatment strategies. J Orthop Traumatol. 2014;15:S62.
31.
MadadiFSarmadiAKahlaeeAH. A new hybrid fixation method in ACL reconstruction surgery. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2010;20(2):137-140.
32.
MagenHEHowellSMHullML. Structural properties of six tibial fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue grafts. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27(1):35-43.
NagarkattiDGMcKeonBPDonahueBSFulkersonJP. Mechanical evaluation of a soft tissue interference screw in free tendon anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(1):67-71.
35.
NohJHYangBGYiSRRohYHLeeJS. Hybrid tibial fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with Achilles tendon allograft. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(10):1540-1546.
36.
NoyesFRButlerDLGroodESZernickeRFHefzyMS. Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(3):344-352.
37.
NurmiJTSievanenHKannusPJarvinenMJarvinenTL. Porcine tibia is a poor substitute for human cadaver tibia for evaluating interference screw fixation. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(3):765-771.
38.
PradoMMartin-CastillaBEspejo-ReinaASerrano-FernandezJMPerez-BlancaAEzquerroF. Close-looped graft suturing improves mechanical properties of interference screw fixation in ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(2):476-484.
RodeoSAArnoczkySPTorzilliPAHidakaCWarrenRF. Tendon-healing in a bone tunnel: a biomechanical and histological study in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(12):1795-1803.
41.
SchefflerSUSudkampNPGockenjanAHoffmannRFWeilerA. Biomechanical comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: the impact of fixation level and fixation method under cyclic loading. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(3):304-315.
42.
SimonianPTMonsonJTLarsonRV. Biodegradable interference screw augmentation reduces tunnel expansion after ACL reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg. 2001;14(2):104-108.
43.
TetsumuraSFujitaANakajimaMAbeM. Biomechanical comparison of different fixation methods on the tibial side in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in porcine tibial bone. J Orthop Sci. 2006;11(3):278-282.
44.
TomitaFYasudaKMikamiSSakaiTYamazakiSTohyamaH. Comparisons of intraosseous graft healing between the doubled flexor tendon graft and the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(5):461-476.
45.
TrojaniCSbihiADjianP. Causes for failure of ACL reconstruction and influence of meniscectomies after revision. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(2):196-201.
46.
TsoukasDFotopoulosVBasdekisGMakridisKG. No difference in osteoarthritis after surgical and non-surgical treatment of ACL-injured knees after 10 years [published online April9, 2015]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.
47.
VopatBPallerDMachanJT. Effectiveness of low-profile supplemental fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with decreased bone mineral density. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(9):1540-1545.
48.
VuoriIHeinonenASievanenHKannusPPasanenMOjaP. Effects of unilateral strength training and detraining on bone mineral density and content in young women: a study of mechanical loading and deloading on human bones. Calcif Tissue Int. 1994;55(1):59-67.
49.
WalshMPWijdicksCAParkerJBHapaOLaPradeRF. A comparison between a retrograde interference screw, suture button, and combined fixation on the tibial side in an all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in a porcine model. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(1):160-167.
50.
WalzBNylandJFisherBKruppRNawabA. Supplemental bio-tenodesis improves tibialis anterior allograft yield load in extremely low density tibiae. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(3):343-347.
51.
WeilerAHoffmannRFBailHJRehmOSudkampNP. Tendon healing in a bone tunnel: part II. Histologic analysis after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(2):124-135.
52.
YooJCAhnJHKimJH. Biomechanical testing of hybrid hamstring graft tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2006;13(6):455-459.
