Microfracture is the most commonly applied arthroscopic marrow stimulation procedure.
Hypothesis:
Articular cartilage repair is improved when the subchondral bone is perforated by small-diameter microfracture awls compared with larger awls.
Study Design:
Controlled laboratory study.
Methods:
Standardized rectangular (4 × 8 mm) full-thickness chondral defects (N = 24) were created in the medial femoral condyle of 16 adult sheep and debrided down to the subchondral bone plate. Three treatment groups (n = 8 defects each) were tested: 6 microfracture perforations using small-diameter awls (1.0 mm; group 1), large-diameter awls (1.2 mm; group 2), or without perforations (debridement control; group 3). Osteochondral repair was assessed at 6 months in vivo using established macroscopic, histological, immunohistochemical, biochemical, and micro–computed tomography analyses.
Results:
Compared with control defects, histological cartilage repair was always improved after both microfracture techniques (P < .023). Application of 1.0-mm microfracture awls led to a significantly improved histological overall repair tissue quality (7.02 ± 0.70 vs 9.03 ± 0.69; P = .008) and surface grading (1.05 ± 0.28 vs 2.10 ± 0.19; P = .001) compared with larger awls. The small-diameter awl decreased relative bone volume of the subarticular spongiosa (bone volume/tissue volume ratio: 23.81% ± 3.37% vs 30.58% ± 2.46%; P = .011). Subchondral bone cysts and intralesional osteophytes were frequently observed after either microfracture treatment. Macroscopic grading, DNA, proteoglycan, and type I and type II collagen contents as well as degenerative changes within the adjacent cartilage remained unaffected by the awl diameter.
Conclusion:
Small-diameter microfracture awls improve articular cartilage repair in the translational sheep model more effectively than do larger awls.
Clinical Relevance:
These data support the use of small microfracture instruments for the surgical treatment of cartilage defects and warrant prolonged clinical investigations.
BenthienJPBehrensP. Reviewing subchondral cartilage surgery: considerations for standardised and outcome predictable cartilage remodelling: a technical note. Int Orthop. 2013;37(11):2139-2145.
2.
BlackmanAJSmithMVFlaniganDCMatavaMJWrightRWBrophyRH. Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcomes after cartilage repair surgery in the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(6):1426-1434.
3.
BorahBDufresneTEChmielewskiPAJohnsonTDChinesAManhartMD. Risedronate preserves bone architecture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis as measured by three-dimensional microcomputed tomography. Bone. 2004;34(4):736-746.
4.
BurrDB. Anatomy and physiology of the mineralized tissues: role in the pathogenesis of osteoarthrosis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004;12(suppl A):S20-S30.
5.
BurrDBRadinEL. Microfractures and microcracks in subchondral bone: are they relevant to osteoarthrosis?Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2003;29(4):675-685.
6.
ChenHChevrierAHoemannCDSunJLascau-ComanVBuschmannMD. Bone marrow stimulation induces greater chondrogenesis in trochlear vs condylar cartilage defects in skeletally mature rabbits. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21(7):999-1007.
7.
ChenHSunJHoemannCD. Drilling and microfracture lead to different bone structure and necrosis during bone-marrow stimulation for cartilage repair. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(11):1432-1438.
8.
ChevrierAKouaoASPicardGHurtigMBBuschmannMD. Interspecies comparison of subchondral bone properties important for cartilage repair. J Orthop Res. 2015;33(1):63-70.
9.
ColeBJFarrJWinalskiCS. Outcomes after a single-stage procedure for cell-based cartilage repair: a prospective clinical safety trial with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(6):1170-1179.
10.
DrobnicMRadosavljevicDCorABrittbergMStrazarK. Debridement of cartilage lesions before autologous chondrocyte implantation by open or transarthroscopic techniques: a comparative study using post-mortem materials. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(4):602-608.
11.
EldracherMOrthPCucchiariniMPapeDMadryH. Small subchondral drill holes improve marrow stimulation of articular cartilage defects. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(11):2741-2750.
12.
FitzmauriceGMLairdNMWareJH. Applied Longitudinal Analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley; 2011.
13.
FlaniganDCHarrisJDTrinhTQSistonRABrophyRH. Prevalence of chondral defects in athletes’ knees: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(10):1795-1801.
14.
FrisbieDDMorissetSHoCPRodkeyWGSteadmanJRMcIlwraithCW. Effects of calcified cartilage on healing of chondral defects treated with microfracture in horses. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(11):1824-1831.
15.
GobbiAKarnatzikosGKumarA. Long-term results after microfracture treatment for full-thickness knee chondral lesions in athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(9):1986-1996.
16.
GoebelLOrthPMullerA. Experimental scoring systems for macroscopic articular cartilage repair correlate with the MOCART score assessed by a high-field MRI at 9.4 Tesla—comparative evaluation of five macroscopic scoring systems in a large animal cartilage defect model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20(9):1046-1055.
17.
GomollAHFarrJGilloglySDKercherJMinasT. Surgical management of articular cartilage defects of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(14):2470-2490.
18.
HedekerDGibbonsRD. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley; 2006.
19.
HoemannCDGosselinYChenH. Characterization of initial microfracture defects in human condyles. J Knee Surg. 2013;26(5):347-355.
20.
HoemannCDHurtigMRossomachaE. Chitosan-glycerol phosphate/blood implants improve hyaline cartilage repair in ovine microfracture defects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(12):2671-2686.
21.
KarthikeyanSRobertsSGriffinD. Microfracture for acetabular chondral defects in patients with femoroacetabular impingement: results at second-look arthroscopic surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(12):2725-2730.
22.
KnutsenGDrogsetJOEngebretsenL. A randomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture: findings at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(10):2105-2112.
23.
KokACTuijthofGJden DunnenS. No effect of hole geometry in microfracture for talar osteochondral defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(11):3653-3662.
24.
KonEGobbiAFilardoGDelcoglianoMZaffagniniSMarcacciM. Arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture for chondral lesions of the knee: prospective nonrandomized study at 5 years. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(1):33-41.
25.
KreuzPCSteinwachsMRErggeletC. Results after microfracture of full-thickness chondral defects in different compartments in the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14(11):1119-1125.
26.
KroellAMarksPChahalJ. Microfracture for chondral defects: assessment of the variability of surgical technique in cadavers [published online December 23, 2014]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3481-8
27.
KuettnerKEColeAA. Cartilage degeneration in different human joints. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005;13(2):93-103.
28.
LittleCBSmithMMCakeMAReadRAMurphyMJBarryFP. The OARSI histopathology initiative—recommendations for histological assessments of osteoarthritis in sheep and goats. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18(suppl 3):S80-S92.
29.
MadryHvan DijkCNMueller-GerblM. The basic science of the subchondral bone. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(4):419-433.
30.
MarchandCChenGTran-KhanhN. Microdrilled cartilage defects treated with thrombin-solidified chitosan/blood implant regenerate a more hyaline, stable, and structurally integrated osteochondral unit compared to drilled controls. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18(5-6):508-519.
31.
McCormickFHarrisJDAbramsGD. Trends in the surgical treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the United States: an analysis of a large private-payer database over a period of 8 years. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(2):222-226.
32.
MinBHChoiWHLeeYS. Effect of different bone marrow stimulation techniques (BSTs) on MSCs mobilization. J Orthop Res. 2013;31(11):1814-1819.
33.
MithoeferKMcAdamsTWilliamsRJKreuzPCMandelbaumBR. Clinical efficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage repair in the knee: an evidence-based systematic analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(10):2053-2063.
34.
MithoeferKWilliamsRJ3rdWarrenRF. The microfracture technique for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee: a prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(9):1911-1920.
35.
MithoeferKWilliamsRJ3rdWarrenRF. Chondral resurfacing of articular cartilage defects in the knee with the microfracture technique: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(suppl 1, pt 2):294-304.
36.
MullerGHanschkeM. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of proteoglycans in cartilage extracts by precipitation with 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue. Connect Tissue Res. 1996;33(4):243-248.
37.
OkazakiNChibaKTaguchiK. Trabecular microfractures in the femoral head with osteoporosis: analysis of microcallus formations by synchrotron radiation micro CT. Bone. 2014;64:82-87.
38.
OrthPCucchiariniMKaulG. Temporal and spatial migration pattern of the subchondral bone plate in a rabbit osteochondral defect model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20(10):1161-1169.
39.
OrthPCucchiariniMKohnDMadryH. Alterations of the subchondral bone in osteochondral repair—translational data and clinical evidence. Eur Cell Mater. 2013;25:299-316.
40.
OrthPGoebelLWolframU. Effect of subchondral drilling on the microarchitecture of subchondral bone: analysis in a large animal model at 6 months. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(4):828-836.
41.
OrthPMadryH. A low morbidity surgical approach to the sheep femoral trochlea. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:5.
42.
OrthPMeyerHLGoebelL. Improved repair of chondral and osteochondral defects in the ovine trochlea compared with the medial condyle. J Orthop Res. 2013;31(11):1772-1779.
43.
OrthPZurakowskiDWincheringerDMadryH. Reliability, reproducibility, and validation of five major histological scoring systems for experimental articular cartilage repair in the rabbit model. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2012;18(5):329-339.
44.
OsterhoffGLofflerSSteinkeHFejaCJostenCHeppP. Comparative anatomical measurements of osseous structures in the ovine and human knee. Knee. 2011;18(2):98-103.
45.
PauchardYMattmannCKuhnAGasserJABoydSK. European Society of Biomechanics S. M. Perren Award 2008: using temporal trends of 3D bone micro-architecture to predict bone quality. J Biomech. 2008;41(14):2946-2953.
46.
SarisDPriceAWiduchowskiW. Matrix-applied characterized autologous cultured chondrocytes versus microfracture: two-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(6):1384-1394.
47.
SarisDBVanlauweJVictorJ. Treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better clinical outcome at 36 months in a randomized trial compared to microfracture. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(suppl 1):10S-19S.
48.
ShapiroFKoideSGlimcherMJ. Cell origin and differentiation in the repair of full-thickness defects of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(4):532-553.
49.
SteadmanJRBriggsKKRodrigoJJKocherMSGillTJRodkeyWG. Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: average 11-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(5):477-484.
50.
SteadmanJRRodkeyWGRodrigoJJ. Microfracture: surgical technique and rehabilitation to treat chondral defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;391(suppl):S362-S369.
51.
van der KraanPMvan den BergWB. Osteophytes: relevance and biology. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15(3):237-244.
52.
van DijkCNReilinghMLZengerinkMvan BergenCJ. Osteochondral defects in the ankle: why painful?Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(5):570-580.
53.
VanlauweJSarisDBVictorJAlmqvistKFBellemansJLuytenFP. Five-year outcome of characterized chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture for symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: early treatment matters. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(12):2566-2574.
54.
WakitaniSGotoTPinedaSJ. Mesenchymal cell-based repair of large, full-thickness defects of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(4):579-592.
