BareniusBForssbladMEngstromBErikssonK. Functional recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, a study of health-related quality of life based on the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(4):914-927.
2.
BodianCAFreedmanGHossainSEisenkraftJBBeilinY. The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001;95(6):1356-1361.
3.
CellaDEtonDTLaiJSPetermanAHMerkelDE. Combining anchor and distribution-based methods to derive minimal clinically important differences on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) anemia and fatigue scales. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002;24(6):547-561.
4.
ChahalJVan ThielGSMatherRC. The patient acceptable symptomatic state for the modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score among patients undergoing surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(8):1844-1849.
5.
De VetHCOsteloRWTerweeCB. Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(1):131-142.
6.
De VetHCTerweeCBOsteloRWBeckermanHKnolDLBouterLM. Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:54.
7.
DougadosM. It’s good to feel better but it’s better to feel good. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(1):1-2.
8.
GuyattGHOsobaDWuAW. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77(4):371-383.
9.
IngelsrudLHGrananLPTerweeCBEngebretsenLRoosEM. Proportion of patients reporting acceptable symptoms or treatment failure and their associated KOOS values at 6 to 24 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(8):1902-1907.
10.
KingMT. A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11(2):171-184.
11.
KvienTKHeibergTHagenKB. Minimal clinically important improvement/difference (MCII/MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): what do these concepts mean?Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(suppl 3):iii40-iii41.
12.
LynchADLogerstedtDSGrindemH. Consensus criteria for defining ‘successful outcome’ after ACL injury and reconstruction: a Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort investigation. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(5):335-342.
13.
TashjianRZDeLoachJPorucznikCAPowellAP. Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(6):927-932.
14.
TubachFDougadosMFalissardB. Feeling good rather than feeling better matters more to patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(4):526-530.
15.
TubachFRavaudPBaronG. Evaluation of clinically relevant states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the patient acceptable symptom state. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(1):34-37.
16.
TubachFRavaudPBeatonD. Minimal clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state for subjective outcome measures in rheumatic disorders. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(5):1188-1193.
17.
TubachFRavaudPMartin-MolaE. Minimum clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state in pain and function in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, chronic back pain, hand osteoarthritis, and hip and knee osteoarthritis: results from a prospective multinational study. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(11):1699-1707.
