CarlsonRVBoydKMWebbDJ. The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: past, present and future. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;57(6):695-713.
2.
ColledgeFElgerBS. Impossible, impractical, and non-identifiable? New criteria regarding consent for human tissue research in the Declaration of Helsinki. Biopreserv Biobank. 2013;11(3):149-152.
3.
CorriganOTuttonR. What’s in a name? Subjects, volunteers, participants and activists in clinical research. Clin Ethics. 2006;1:101-104.
4.
CoursenJSHollierLHJr.Review of “Fifty Years at the Forefront of Ethical Guidance: The World Medical Association Declaration of Helskinki” by Parsa-Parsi RW, Ellis R, Weising Y in South Med J 107:405-406, 2014. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(1):308.
5.
CvetanovichGLFillinghamYAHarrisJD. Publication and level of evidence trends in The American Journal of Sports Medicine from 1996 to 2011. Am J Sports Med. 2014;43(1):220-225.
6.
DhaiA. The research ethics evolution: from Nuremberg to Helsinki. S Afr Med J. 2014;104(3):178-180.
7.
EmanuelEJ. Reconsidering the Declaration of Helsinki. Lancet. 2013;381:1532-1533.
8.
FreshwaterMFGarcia-ZalisnakDEGonzalez-OrtizNE. Failure of plastic surgical clinical trials to document compliance with international ethics guidelines: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(1):3-8.
9.
HellmannFVerdiMSchlemperBRCaponiS. 50th anniversary of the Declaration of Helsinki: the double standard was introduced. Arch Med Res. 2014;45(7):600-601.
10.
HeringaJDuteJ. The proposed EU-regulation on clinical trial on medicinal products: an unethical proposal?Eur J Health Law. 2013;20(4):347-362.
11.
HurstSA. Declaration of Helsinki and protection of vulnerable research participants [letter]. JAMA. 2014;311(12):1252.
12.
LieRKEmanuelEGradyCWendlerD. The standard of care debate: the Declaration of Helsinki versus the international consensus opinion. J Med Ethics. 2004;30(2):190-193.
13.
MillumJGradyC. The ethics of placebo-controlled trials: methodological justifications. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013;36(2):510-514.
14.
MurphySNolanCO’RourkeCFentonJE. The reporting of research ethics committee approval and informed consent in otolaryngology journals. Clin Otolaryngol. 2015;40(1):36-40.
15.
MuthuswamyV. The new 2013 seventh version of the Declaration of Helsinki—more old wine in a new bottle?Indian J Med Ethics. 2014;11(1):2-4.
16.
NathansonV. Revising the Declaration of Helsinki: your chance to influence research governance. BMJ. 2013;346:f2837.
17.
PalaciosR. Post-trial access and the new version of the Declaration of Helsinki. Colomb Med. 2013;44(4):206-207.
18.
Parsa-ParsiRBlackmerJEhniHJ. Reconsidering the Declaration of Helsinki [letter]. Lancet. 2013;382:1246-1247.
19.
Parsa-ParsiRWEllisRWiesingU. Fifty years at the forefront of ethical guidance: the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. South Med J. 2014;107(7):405-406.
20.
ShahP. Practical issues in implementation of WMA’s draft Declaration of Helsinki [letter]. Indian J Med Ethics. 2014;11(1):63-64.
21.
ShawDMcMahonA. Ethicovigilance in clinical trials. Bioethics. 2013;27(9):508-513.
22.
StrechDMetzCKnuppelH. Do editorial policies support ethics research? A thematic text analysis of author instructions in psychiatry journals. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e97492.
23.
VastagB. Helsinki discord? A controversial declaration. JAMA. 2000;284(23):2983-2985.
24.
WilsonCB. An updated Declaration of Helsinki will provide more protection. Nat Med. 2013;19(6):664.
25.
WolinskyH. The battle of Helsinki: two troublesome paragraphs in the Declaration of Helsinki are causing a furore over medical research ethics. EMBO Rep. 2006;7(7):670-672.
26.
WoodsSMcCormackP. Disputing the ethics of research: the challenge from bioethics and patient activism to the interpretation of the Declaration of Helsinki in clinical trials. Bioethics. 2013;27(5):243-250.
27.
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194.
