BalistreriWF. Landmark, landmine, or landfill? The role of peer review in assessing manuscripts. J Pediatrics. 2007;151(2):107-108.
2.
CallahamMMcCullochC. Longitudinal trends in the performance of scientific peer reviewers. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57(2):141-148.
3.
CallahamMLSchrigerDL. Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40(3):323-328.
4.
GraingerDW. Peer review as a professional responsibility: a quality control system only as good as the participants. Biomaterials. 2007;28:5199-5203.
5.
GreenSMCallahamML. Implementation of a journal peer reviewer stratification system based on quality and reliability. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57(2):149-152.e4.
6.
HeltonMLBalistreriWF. Peering into peer-review. J Pediatr. 2011;159(1):150-151.
7.
HouryDGreenSCallahamM. Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:83.
8.
KowalczukMKDudbridgeFNandaSHarrimanSMylanEC. A comparison of the quality of reviewer reports from author-suggested reviewers and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or closed peer review models. Paper presented at: Seventh International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication;September 8-10, 2013; Chicago, Illinois. http://www.peerreviewcongress.org/abstracts_2013.html#87. Accessed October 27, 2014.
9.
RivaraFPCummingsPRingoldS. A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors. J Pediatr. 2007;151(2):202-205.
10.
SchroterSBlackNEvansS. Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2004;328(7441):673.
11.
WagerEParkinECTamberPS. Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded retrospective study. BMC Med. 2006;4:13.
12.
YangY. Effects of training reviewers on quality of peer review: a before-and-after study. Paper presented at: Sixth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication. September 10-12, 2009; Vancouver, Canada. http://www.peerreviewcongress.org/abstracts_2009.html#86. Accessed October 27, 2014.
