Surgical Trends in the Treatment of Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior Lesions of the Shoulder

Abstract

Background:

After failure of nonoperative treatment, repair has long been the primary treatment option for symptomatic superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions of the shoulder. There is growing evidence to support both biceps tenotomy and tenodesis as effective alternative treatments for SLAP lesions.

Hypotheses:

For patients with isolated SLAP lesions, the frequency of SLAP repair has decreased, while treatment with biceps tenodesis and tenotomy has increased. Similar trends are expected in patients with SLAP lesions undergoing concomitant rotator cuff repair.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A query of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery part II database was performed from 2002 to 2011. The database was searched for patients with isolated SLAP lesions undergoing SLAP repair, open biceps tenodesis, arthroscopic biceps tenodesis, or biceps tenotomy. The database was then queried a second time for patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with concomitant SLAP repair, biceps tenodesis, or biceps tenotomy.

Results:

From 2002 to 2011, there were 8963 cases reported for the treatment of an isolated SLAP lesion and 1540 cases reported for the treatment of SLAP lesions with concomitant rotator cuff repair. For patients with isolated SLAP lesions, the proportion of SLAP repairs decreased from 69.3% to 44.8% (P < .0001), while biceps tenodesis increased from 1.9% to 18.8% (P < .0001), and biceps tenotomy increased from 0.4% to 1.7% (P = .018). For patients undergoing concomitant rotator cuff repair, SLAP repair decreased from 60.2% to 15.3% (P < .0001), while biceps tenodesis or tenotomy increased from 6.0% to 28.0% (P < .0001). There was a significant difference in the mean age of patients undergoing SLAP repair (37.1 years) versus biceps tenodesis (47.2 years) versus biceps tenotomy (55.7 years) (P < .0001).

Conclusion:

Practice trends for orthopaedic board candidates indicate that the proportion of SLAP repairs has decreased over time, with an increase in biceps tenodesis and tenotomy. Increased patient age correlates with the likelihood of treatment with biceps tenodesis or tenotomy versus SLAP repair.

Keywords

SLAP biceps tenotomy biceps tenodesis rotator cuff tear

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbot

Busconi

. Arthroscopic treatment of concomitant superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions and rotator cuff tears in patients over the age of 45 years. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(7):1358-1362.

Boileau

Parratte

Chuinard

Roussanne

Shia

Bicknell

. Arthroscopic treatment of isolated type II SLAP lesions: biceps tenodesis as an alternative to reinsertion. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(5):929-936.

Brockmeier

Voos

Williams

3rd Altchek

Cordasco

Allen

. Outcomes after arthroscopic repair of type-II SLAP lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(7):1595-1603.

Duff

Campbell

. Patient acceptance of long head of biceps brachii tenotomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(1):61-65.

Edwards

Lee

Bell

. Nonoperative treatment of superior labrum anterior posterior tears: improvements in pain, function, and quality of life. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(7):1456-1461.

Forsythe

Guss

Anthony

Martin

. Concomitant arthroscopic SLAP and rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(6):1362-1369.

Franceschi

Longo

Ruzzini

Rizzello

Maffulli

Denaro

. No advantages in repairing a type II superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesion when associated with rotator cuff repair in patients over age 50: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(2):247-253.

Gorantla

Gill

Wright

. The outcome of type II SLAP repair: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(4):537-545.

Kim

Choi

. Results of arthroscopic treatment of superior labral lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(6):981-985.

10.

Kim

Lee

Kim

Woo

Chun

. Arthroscopic repair of concomitant type II SLAP lesions in large to massive rotator cuff tears: comparison with biceps tenotomy. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(12):2786-2793.

11.

Koval

Marsh

Anglen

Weinstein

Harrast

. Are recent graduates of orthopaedic training programs performing less fracture care? American Board of Orthopedic Surgeons part II: a quality improvement initiative. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(3):189-192.

12.

Lin

Jager

. Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2010;2(1):e6.

13.

Mauro

Jordan

Irrgang

Harner

. Practice patterns for subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair: an analysis of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(16):1492-1499.

14.

Owens

Harrast

Hurwitz

Thompson

Wolf

. Surgical trends in Bankart repair: an analysis of data from the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery certification examination. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(9):1865-1869.

15.

Park

Chung

Jeon

Lee

. Clinical and radiological outcomes of type 2 superior labral anterior posterior repairs in elite overhead athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(6):1372-1379.

16.

Provencher

McCormick

Dewing

McIntire

Solomon

. A prospective analysis of 179 type 2 superior labrum anterior and posterior repairs: outcomes and factors associated with success and failure. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(4):880-886.

17.

Snyder

Banas

Karzel

. An analysis of 140 injuries to the superior glenoid labrum. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4(4):243-248.

18.

Snyder

Karzel

Del Pizzo

Ferkel

Friedman

. SLAP lesions of the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 1990;6(4):274-279.

19.

Voos

Pearle

Mattern

Cordasco

Allen

Warren

. Outcomes of combined arthroscopic rotator cuff and labral repair. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(7):1174-1179.

20.

Weber

Martin

Seiler

3rd Harrast

. Superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions of the shoulder: incidence rates, complications, and outcomes as reported by American Board of Orthopedic Surgery. Part II candidates. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(7):1538-1543.