Abstract
Background:
Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is commonly performed with a bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) allograft. However, grafts may result from harvesting the central region of a whole graft (C-BTB), the medial 10 mm of a lateral hemi-BTB (L-BTB) graft, or the lateral 10 mm of a medial hemi-BTB (M-BTB) graft.
Purpose:
To quantify potential differences in graft biomechanical properties when comparing whole versus hemi-BTB grafts.
Study Design:
Controlled laboratory study.
Methods:
Ten pairs of human BTB allografts (irradiated with 1.0-1.2 Mrad) were randomized to preparation as whole grafts or hemigrafts. From these, 10-mm grafts were prepared from the center or the most central portion, respectively. After measurements of tendon thickness, width, and length, specimens underwent cyclic tensile testing, followed by load-to-failure analysis. Biomechanical outcomes included cyclic elongation and creep strain along with the following failure characteristics: maximum load, elongation at maximum load, maximum stress, strain at maximum stress, and linear stiffness.
Results:
Regionally, the mean thickness of the C-BTB (5.18 ± 0.75 mm), M-BTB (5.08 ± 0.56 mm), and L-BTB (5.32 ± 0.62 mm) grafts were comparable (
Conclusion:
Biomechanical failure properties (maximum load, stress, and stiffness) of the central portion of a whole BTB graft are superior to those of the medial portion of a lateral hemi-BTB graft and the lateral portion of a medial hemi-BTB graft. However, cyclic loading characteristics did not differ between grafts.
Clinical Relevance:
Although the true central-third BTB graft is biomechanically superior to hemi-BTB grafts, future studies are necessary to determine if the use of hemigrafts leads to an increased incidence of clinical failure.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
