Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Björk
B-C
Solomon
D
. Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact . BMC Med . 2012 ;10 :73 .
2.
Davis
PM
. Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing . FASEB J . 2011 ;25 :2129 -2134 .
3.
Enserink
M
. Scientific publishing. As open access explodes, how to tell the good from the bad and the ugly? Science . 2012 ;338 (6110 ):1018 .
4.
Frank
M
. Open but not free—publishing in the 21st century . N Engl J Med . 2013 ;368 :787 -789 .
5.
Gargouri
Y
Hajjem
C
Larivière
V
. Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research . PLoS One . 2010 ;5 (10 ):e13636 .
6.
Haug
C
. The downside of open-access publishing . N Engl J Med . 2013 ;368 :791 -793 .
7.
Kolata
G
. Scientific articles accepted (personal checks, too) . New York Times . April 7 , 2013 . http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/for-scientists-an-exploding-world-of-pseudo-academia.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20130408. Accessed April 20, 2013 .
8.
Laakso
M
Björk
B-C
. Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure . BMC Med . 2012 ;10 :124 .
9.
Wolpert
AJ
. For the sake of inquiry and knowledge—the inevitability of open access . N Engl J Med . 2013 ;368 :785 -787 .