Clinical Outcomes for Reconstruction of the Posterolateral Corner and Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Injuries With Mild Grade 2 or Less Posterior Translation

Abstract

Background:

There have been no previous studies showing clinical outcomes according to treatment options of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury with mild grade 2 or less posterior translation (<7 mm) combined with posterolateral rotatory instability.

Purpose:

To compare the clinical outcomes of posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction with or without simultaneous PCL reconstruction in PCL injuries with mild posterior translation.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A total of 46 patients with a PCL injury with mild posterior translation combined with posterolateral rotatory instability were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-two patients had undergone isolated PLC reconstruction (group A), and 24 patients had undergone simultaneous reconstruction of the PCL and PLC (group B). Each patient was assessed for knee instability with the dial test at 30° and 90° as well as with varus and posterior stress radiography and were evaluated with the Lysholm knee score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and objective grading.

Results:

In all cases, the minimum follow-up period was 24 months. At the final follow-up evaluation, no significant side-to-side difference was found on varus stress radiography (group A, 1.55 ± 0.78 mm vs group B, 1.35 ± 1.00 mm; P = .458) or the dial test (at 30°: group A, 4.00° ± 1.83° vs group B, 4.04° ± 1.30°; P = .929; at 90°: group A, 3.64° ± 1.18° vs group B, 3.67° ± 1.37°; P = .937). However, group B showed a significant improvement compared with group A on posterior stress radiography (group A, 0.16 ± 0.44 mm vs group B, –1.44 ± 0.74 mm; P < .001), Lysholm knee score (group A, 18.36 ± 8.73 vs group B, 23.42 ± 7.44; P = .040), IKDC subjective score (group A, 25.51 ± 7.11 vs group B, 33.08 ± 5.89; P < .001), and IKDC objective score (group A preoperatively: grade C = 19 patients, grade D = 3; group B preoperatively: grade C = 20, grade D = 4; group A postoperatively: grade B = 11, grade C = 11; group B postoperatively: grade A = 12, grade B = 9, grade C = 3) (P < .001).

Conclusion:

Simultaneous reconstruction of the PCL and PLC is recommended when addressing PCL injuries with mild grade 2 or less posterior translation combined with posterolateral rotary instability.

Keywords

posterior cruciate ligament posterolateral corner posterolateral rotary instability simultaneous reconstruction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Apsingi

Nguyen

Bull

Unwin

Deehan

Amis

. A comparison of modified Larson and ‘anatomic’ posterolateral corner reconstructions in knees with combined PCL and posterolateral corner deficiency. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:305-312.

Fowler

Messieh

. Isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1987;15:553-557.

Grood

Noyes

Butler

Suntay

. Ligamentous and capsular restraints preventing straight medial and lateral laxity in intact human cadaver knees. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:1257-1269.

Harner

Vogrin

Höher

Woo

. Biomechanical analysis of a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: deficiency of the posterolateral structures as a cause of graft failure. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:32-39.

Hefti

Müller

Jakob

Stäubli

. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993;1:226-234.

Hughston

Andrews

Cross

Moschi

. Classification of knee ligament instabilities, II: the lateral compartment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:173-179.

Irrgang

Anderson

Boland

; International Knee Documentation Committee. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1567-1573.

Jacobsen

. Stress radiographical measurement of the anteroposterior, medial and lateral stability of the knee joint. Acta Orthop Scand. 1976;47(3):335-340.

Kanamori

Lee

Haemmerle

Vogrin

Harner

. A biomechanical analysis of two reconstructive approaches to the posterolateral corner of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11:312-317.

10.

Kim

. High portal: practical philosophy for positioning portals in knee arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(3):333-337.

11.

Kim

. A modified endoscopic technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using allograft. Arthroscopy. 1998;14:643-648.

12.

Kim

Chun

. Clinical comparisons of the anatomical reconstruction and modified biceps rerouting technique for chronic posterolateral instability combined with posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(9):809-818.

13.

Kim

Park

Cheon

Ryu

. New technique for chronic posterolateral instability of the knee: posterolateral reconstruction using the tibialis posterior tendon allograft. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(Suppl 2):195-200.

14.

LaPrade

Muench

Wentorf

Lewis

. The effect of injury to the posterolateral structures of the knee on force in a posterior cruciate ligament graft: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:233-238.

15.

Lysholm

Gillquist

. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10:150-154.

16.

Margheritini

Mancini

Mauro

Mariani

. Stress radiography for quantifying posterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:706-711.

17.

Markolf

Wascher

Finerman

. Direct in vitro measurement of forces in the cruciate ligaments, part II: the effect of section of the posterolateral structures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:387-394.

18.

Nau

Chevalier

Hagemeister

Deguise

Duval

. Comparison of 2 surgical techniques of posterolateral corner reconstruction of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1838-1845.

19.

Noyes

Barber-Westin

. Posterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction, part 1: causes of surgical failure in 52 consecutive operations. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:646-654.

20.

Noyes

Stowers

Grood

Cummings

VanGinkel

. Posterior subluxations of the medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartments: an in vitro ligament sectioning study in cadaveric knees. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:407-414.

21.

Outerbridge

. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43:752-757.

22.

Schulz

Russe

Lampakis

Strobel

. Reliability of stress radiography for evaluation of posterior knee laxity. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(4):502-506.

23.

Shelbourne

Davis

Patel

. The natural history of acute, isolated, nonoperatively treated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:276-283.

24.

Shelbourne

Jennings

Vahey

. Magnetic resonance imaging of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: assessment of healing. Am J Knee Surg. 1999;12(4):209-213.

25.

Shelbourne

Muthukaruppan

. Subjective results of nonoperatively treated, acute, isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:457-461.

26.

Shino

Horibe

Nakata

Maeda

Hamada

Makamura

. Conservative treatment of isolated injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament in athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:895-900.

27.

Staubli

Jakob

. Posterior instability of the knee near extension: a clinical and stress radiographic analysis of acute injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(2):225-230.