Quantifying Acromiohumeral Distance in Overhead Athletes With Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Loss and the Influence of a Stretching Program

Abstract

Background:

Loss of internal rotation range of motion (ROM) on the dominant side is well documented in athletes performing overhead sports activity. This altered motion pattern has been shown to change glenohumeral and scapular kinematics. This could compromise the subacromial space and explain the association between glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) and subacromial impingement.

Purpose:

First, to quantify acromiohumeral distance (AHD) and compare between the dominant and nondominant side in overhead athletes with GIRD of more than 15°. Second, to investigate the effect of a sleeper stretch program on ROM and AHD.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

Range of motion was measured with a digital inclinometer and AHD was measured with ultrasound in 62 overhead athletes with GIRD (>15°) at baseline. Differences between sides were analyzed. Athletes were randomly allocated to the stretch (n = 30) or control group (n = 32). The stretch group performed a 6-week sleeper stretch program on the dominant side. Change of range of motion and AHD were measured and analyzed in both groups after 6 weeks.

Results:

The dominant side showed a significant internal rotation deficit (−24.7° ± 6.3°) and horizontal adduction deficit (−11.8° ± 7.4°) and the dominant side AHD was significantly smaller with the arm at neutral (−0.4 ± 0.6 mm) and at 45° (−0.5 ± 0.8 mm) and 60° (−0.6 ± 0.7 mm) of active abduction compared with the nondominant side. After stretching, significant increase of internal rotation (+13.5° ± 0.8°), horizontal adduction (+10.6° ± 0.9°) ROM and AHD (+0.5 to +0.6mm) was observed at the dominant side of the stretch group compared with prestretching measurements. No significant change of AHD was seen in the nondominant side of the stretch group and in both sides of the control group.

Conclusion:

The AHD, a 2-dimensional measure for subacromial space, was found to be smaller on the dominant side in athletes with GIRD and was found to increase after a 6-week sleeper stretch program.

Clinical Relevance:

These findings might provide insight into the relation between GIRD and subacromial impingement but future studies are needed to determine clinical implications.

Keywords

overhead athletes subacromial space shoulder impingement syndrome decreased internal rotation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atalar

Yilmaz

Polat

Selek

Uras

Yanik

. Restricted scapular mobility during arm abduction: implications for impingement syndrome. Acta Orthop Belg. 2009;75:19-24.

Awan

Smith

Boon

. Measuring shoulder internal rotation range of motion: a comparison of 3 techniques. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1229-1234.

Azzoni

Cabitza

Parrini

. Sonographic evaluation of subacromial space. Ultrasonics. 2004;42:683-687.

Borich

Bright

Lorello

Cieminski

Buisman

Ludewig

. Scapular angular positioning at end range internal rotation in cases of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36:926-934.

Borsa

Dover

Wilk

Reinold

. Glenohumeral range of motion and stiffness in professional baseball pitchers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:21-26.

Borsa

Laudner

Sauers

. Mobility and stability adaptations in the shoulder of the overhead athlete: a theoretical and evidence-based perspective. Sports Med. 2008;38:17-36.

Burkhart

Morgan

Kibler

. The disabled throwing shoulder: spectrum of pathology part i: pathoanatomy and biomechanics. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:404-420.

Cools

Cambier

Witvrouw

. Screening the athlete’s shoulder for impingement symptoms: a clinical reasoning algorithm for early detection of shoulder pathology. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42:628-635.

Crockett

Gross

Wilk

. Osseous adaptation and range of motion at the glenohumeral joint in professional baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:20-26.

10.

Desmeules

Minville

Riederer

Cote

Fremont

. Acromio-humeral distance variation measured by ultrasonography and its association with the outcome of rehabilitation for shoulder impingement syndrome. Clin J Sport Med. 2004;14:197-205.

11.

Ellenbecker

Cools

. Rehabilitation of shoulder impingement syndrome and rotator cuff injuries: an evidence-based review. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:319-327.

12.

Ellenbecker

Roetert

Bailie

Davies

Brown

. Glenohumeral joint total rotation range of motion in elite tennis players and baseball pitchers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002;34:2052-2056.

13.

Harryman

II Sidles

Clark

Mcquade

Gibb

Matsen

. Translation of the humeral head on the glenoid with passive glenohumeral motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:1334-1343.

14.

Kibler

Chandler

. Range of motion in junior tennis players participating in an injury risk modification program. J Sci Med Sport. 2003;6:51-62.

15.

Laudner

Moline

Meister

. The relationship between forward scapular posture and posterior shoulder tightness among baseball players. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:2106-2112.

16.

Laudner

Sipes

Wilson

. The acute effects of sleeper stretches on shoulder range of motion. J Athl Train. 2008;43:359-363.

17.

Laudner

Stanek

Meister

. Assessing posterior shoulder contracture: the reliability and validity of measuring glenohumeral joint horizontal adduction. J Athl Train. 2006;41:375-380.

18.

Lin

Lim

Yang

. Effect of shoulder tightness on glenohumeral translation, scapular kinematics, and scapulohumeral rhythm in subjects with stiff shoulders. J Orthop Res. 2006;24:1044-1051.

19.

Lin

Yang

. Reliability and validity of shoulder tightness measurement in patients with stiff shoulders. Man Ther. 2006;11:146-152.

20.

Lintner

Mayol

Uzodinma

Jones

Labossiere

. Glenohumeral internal rotation deficits in professional pitchers enrolled in an internal rotation stretching program. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:617-621.

21.

McClure

Balaicuis

Heiland

Broersma

Thorndike

Wood

. A randomized controlled comparison of stretching procedures for posterior shoulder tightness. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37:108-114.

22.

McClure

Bialker

Neff

Williams

Karduna

. Shoulder function and 3-dimensional kinematics in people with shoulder impingement syndrome before and after a 6-week exercise program. Phys Ther. 2004;84:832-848.

23.

Muraki

Yamamoto

Zhao

. Effects of posterior capsule tightness on subacromial contact behavior during shoulder motions [published online November 12, 2011]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. doi:10.1016/J.Jse.2011.08.04210.1016/J.Jse.2011.08.042.

24.

Muraki

Yamamoto

Zhao

. Effect of posteroinferior capsule tightness on contact pressure and area beneath the coracoacromial arch during pitching motion. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:600-607.

25.

Myers

Oyama

Wassinger

. Reliability, precision, accuracy, and validity of posterior shoulder tightness assessment in overhead athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1922-1930.

26.

Norkin

White

. Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis; 1995.

27.

Osbahr

Cannon

Speer

. Retroversion of the humerus in the throwing shoulder of college baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:347-353.

28.

Oyama

Goerger

Lephart

Myers

. Effects of non-assisted posterior shoulder stretches on shoulder range of motion among collegiate baseball pitchers. Athletic Training And Sports Health Care. 2010;2:163-170.

29.

Poitras

Kingwell

Ramadan

Russell

Uhthoff

Lapner

. The effect of posterior capsular tightening on peak subacromial contact pressure during simulated active abduction in the scapular plane. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:406-413.

30.

Reagan

Meister

Horodyski

Werner

Carruthers

Wilk

. Humeral retroversion and its relationship to glenohumeral rotation in the shoulder of college baseball players. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:354-360.

31.

Reinold

Wilk

Macrina

. Changes in shoulder and elbow passive range of motion after pitching in professional baseball players. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:523-527.

32.

Seitz

Mcclure

Lynch

Ketchum

Michener

. Effects of scapular dyskinesis and scapular assistance test on subacromial space during static arm elevation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(5):631-640.

33.

Silva

Hartmann

Laurino

Bilo

. Clinical and ultrasonographic correlation between scapular dyskinesia and subacromial space measurement among junior elite tennis players. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:407-410.

34.

Solem-Bertoft

Thuomas

Westerberg

. The influence of scapular retraction and protraction on the width of the subacromial space. An MRI study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;296:99-103.

35.

Tehranzadeh

Fronek

Resnick

. Posterior capsular fibrosis in professional baseball pitchers: case series of MR arthrographic findings in six patients with glenohumeral internal rotational deficit. Clin Imaging. 2007;31:343-348.

36.

Thomas

Swanik

Higginson

. A bilateral comparison of posterior capsule thickness and its correlation with glenohumeral range of motion and scapular upward rotation in collegiate baseball players. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20:708-716.

37.

Thomas

Swanik

Kelly

IV . Internal rotation deficits affect scapular positioning in baseball players. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1551-1557.

38.

Torres

Gomes

. Measurement of glenohumeral internal rotation in asymptomatic tennis players and swimmers. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:1017-1023.

39.

Tyler

Nicholas

Roy

Gleim

. Quantification of posterior capsule tightness and motion loss in patients with shoulder impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:668-673.

40.

Tyler

Roy

Nicholas

Gleim

. Reliability and validity of a new method of measuring posterior shoulder tightness. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999;29:262-269.

41.

Warner

Micheli

Arslanian

Kennedy

. Patterns of flexibility, laxity, and strength in normal shoulders and shoulders with instability and impingement. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18:366-375.

42.

Wilk

Macrina

Fleisig

. Correlation of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and total rotational motion to shoulder injuries in professional baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:329-335.