AdkisonJWRequaRKGarrickJG. Injury rates in high school football: a comparison of synthetic surfaces and grass fields. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974;99:131-136.
2.
AndréassonGLindenbergerURenstromRPetersonL. Torque developed at simulated sliding between sport shoes and an artificial turf. Am J Sports Med. 1986;14(3):225-230.
3.
BramwellSTRequaRKGarrickJG. High school football injuries: a pilot comparison of playing surfaces. Med Sci Sports. 1972;4(3):166-169.
4.
CameronBMDavisO. The swivel football shoe: a controlled study. J Sports Med. 1973;1(2):16-27.
5.
DragooJLBraunHJDurhamJLChenMRHarrisAH. Incidence and risk factors for injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament in National Collegiate Athletic Association football: data from the 2004-2005 through 2008-2009 National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(5):990-995.
6.
EllisonAE. Research in sports medicine. J Sports Med. 1975;3(4): 188-191.
7.
HeidtRSJrDormerSGCawleyPWScrantonPEJrLosseGHowardM. Differences in friction and torsional resistance in athletic shoe-turf surface interfaces. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24(6):834-842.
8.
HisakaLIKrahenbuhlGS. Intramural flag-football injuries on tartan turf and natural grass. J Sports Med. 1976;3(6):296-300.
9.
KeeneJSNarechaniaRGSachtjenKMClancyWG. Tartan Turf on trial: a comparison of intercollegiate football injuries occurring on natural grass and Tartan Turf. Am J Sports Med. 1980;8(1):43-47.
10.
LambsonRBBarnhillBSHigginsRW. Football cleat design and its effect on anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a three-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24(2):155-159.
11.
LevyIMSkovronMLAgelJ. Living with artificial grass: a knowledge update. Part 1: basic science. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18(4):406-412.
12.
LivesayGARedaDRNaumanEA. Peak torque and rotational stiffness developed at the shoe-surface interface: the effect of shoe type and playing surface. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(3):415-422.
13.
MeyersMC. Incidence, mechanisms, and severity of game-related college football injuries on FieldTurf versus natural grass: a 3-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(4):687-697.
14.
MeyersMCBarnhillBS. Incidence, causes, and severity of high school football injuries on FieldTurf versus natural grass: a 5-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(7):1626-1638.
15.
MuellerFOBlythCS. North Carolina high school football injury study: equipment and prevention. Sports Med. 1974;2(1):1-10.
OrchardJWPowellJW. Risk of knee and ankle sprains under various weather conditions in American football. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(7):1118-1123.
18.
PowellJWSchootmanM. A multivariate risk analysis of selected playing surfaces in the National Football League: 1980 to 1989. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(6):686-694.
19.
ScrantonPEJrWhiteselJPPowellJW. A review of selected noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the National Football League. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18(12):772-776.
20.
TorgJSQuedenfeldT. Effect of shoe type and cleat length on the incidence and severity of knee injuries among high school football players. Res Q. 1971;42(2):203-211.
21.
TorgJSQuedenfeldTCLandauS. The shoe-surface interface and its relationship to football knee injuries. J Sports Med. 1974;2(5):261-269.
22.
TorgJSStilwellGRogersK. The effect of ambient temperature on the shoe-surface interface release coefficient. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24(1):79-82.
23.
VillwockMRMeyerEGPowellJWFoutyAJHautRC. Football playing surface and shoe design affect rotational traction. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(3):518-525.
24.
WilliamsSHumePAKaraS. A review of football injuries on third and fourth generation artificial turfs compared with natural turf. Sports Med. 2011;41(11):903-923.
