Background: Surgical management of patellar cartilage defects remains controversial. The ideal technique to regenerate hyaline cartilage is not yet defined. However, a synthetic resorbable osteochondral scaffold plug (TruFit CB) seems to offer a treatment option with good results at short-term follow-up, at least in the condylar setting.
Hypothesis: A synthetic implant provides a simple and efficacious means of treating the cartilage defects of the patellofemoral joint in young patients.
Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: A study was designed to evaluate prospectively short- and medium-term results in patients with osteochondral patellar defects treated with synthetic reabsorbable scaffolds. Patient outcome scores (Short Form 36 [SF-36] and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]), demographics, prior surgeries, and data from a physical examination were collected at baseline (before implantation) and at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Defect characteristics were collected during implantation. Diagnosis and monitoring were performed by magnetic resonance imaging.
Results: Ten patients with a mean age of 33.3 years (range, 16-49 years) were evaluated prospectively at 24 months’ follow-up. The number of plugs used for each patient ranged from 1 to 4. At 1-year follow-up, the results were satisfactory in 8 of 10 patients, and poor in 2, according to clinical assessment (KOOS, visual analog scale, and SF-36). At 18 months of follow-up, all patients except one complained of pain and knee swelling. Reoperation rate for implant failure at final follow-up was 70%. Magnetic resonance imaging at final follow-up showed a cylindrical cavity of fibrous tissue instead of subchondral bone restoration.
Conclusion: A synthetic implant can improve symptoms and joint function, especially for small lesions, only for a short period of time. However, 2 years of monitoring has shown its failure in restoring the subchondral bone despite the formation of predominant hyaline cartilage from synthetic resorbable scaffolds. Under current conditions and according to our experience, we do not recommend TruFit synthetic implants for osteochondral patellar defects in active patients.
BarberFADockeryWD. A computed tomography scan assessment of synthetic multiphase polymer scaffolds used for osteochondral defect repair. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(1):60-64.
2.
BauerMJacksonROgilvie-HarrisDMorbidiM. Classificazione artroscopica delle lesioni condrali del gionocchio. Med Sport. 1987;40:41-44.
3.
BrittbergMLindahlANillsonAOhlssonCIsakssonOPetersonL. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:889-895.
4.
CarmontMRCarey-SmithRSaithnaADhillonMThompsonPSpaldingT. Delayed incorporation of a TruFit plug: perseverance is recommended. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(7):810-814.
5.
FarrJ2nd. Autologous chondrocyte implantation and anteromedialization in the treatment of patellofemoral chondrosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 2008;39(3):329-335.
6.
FlaniganDCHarrisJDTrinhTQSistonRABrophyRH. Prevalence of chondral defects in athletes’ knees: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(10):1795-1801.
7.
GobbiAKonEBerrutoM. Patellofemoral full-thickness chondral defects treated with second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation: results at 5 years’ follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(6):1083-1092.
8.
GomollAHFarrJGilloglySDKercherJMinasT. Surgical management of articular cartilage defects of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2470-2490.
9.
HangodyLDobosJBalóEPánicsGHangodyLRBerkesI. Clinical experiences with autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty in an athletic population: a 17-year prospective multicenter study. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(6):1125-1133.
JamaliAAEmmersonBCChungCConveryFRBugbeeWD. Fresh osteochondral allografts: results in the patellofemoral joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;437:176-185.
12.
JansenEJSladekREBaharH. Hydrophobicity as a design criterion for polymer scaffolds in bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005;26(21):4423-4431.
13.
KarataglisDGreenMALearmonthDJ. Autologous osteochondral transplantation for the treatment of chondral defects of the knee. Knee. 2006;13(1):32-35.
14.
KreuzPCSteinwachsMRErggeletC. Results after microfracture of full-thickness chondral defects in different compartments in the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14(11):1119-1125.
15.
Mainil-VarletPAignerTBrittbergM. Histological assessment of cartilage repair: a report by the Histology Endpoint Committee of the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(Suppl 2):45-57.
16.
MarlovitsSSingerPZellerPMandlIHallerJTrattnigS. Magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) for the evaluation of autologous chondrocyte transplantation: determination of interobserver variability and correlation to clinical outcome after 2 years. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57(1):16-23.
17.
MeltonJTWilsonAJChapman-SheathPCosseyAJ. TruFit CB bone plug: chondral repair, scaffold design, surgical technique and early experiences. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2010;7(3):333-341.
18.
MithoeferKWilliamsRJ3rdWarrenRF. Chondral resurfacing of articular cartilage defects in the knee with the microfracture technique: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:294-304.
19.
NhoSJFooLFGreenDM. Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical evaluation of patellar resurfacing with press-fit osteochondral autograft plugs. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(6):1101-1109.
20.
OuterbridgeRE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43:752-757.
21.
Pascual-GarridoCSlabaughMAL’HeureuxDRFrielNAColeBJ. Recommendations and treatment outcomes for patellofemoral articular cartilage defects with autologous chondrocyte implantation: prospective evaluation at average 4-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(Suppl 1):33S-41S.
22.
PetersonLVasiliadisHSBrittbergMLindahlA. Autologous chondrocyte implantation: a long-term follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(6):1117-1124.
23.
RaghunathJRolloJSalesKMButlerPESeifalianAM. Biomaterials and scaffold design: key to tissue-engineering cartilage. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2007;46(2):73-84.
