Background: Recently, clinicians and researchers started using diagnostic ultrasound to measure humeral torsion as an alternative to radiological assessments in overhead-throwing athletes and other clinical populations. Ultrasound appears to be a reliable, nonradiological alternative, but ultrasound assessment has not been validated against computed tomography (CT), the current gold standard.
Purpose: This study aimed to establish the validity of an ultrasound assessment of humeral torsion by comparing data obtained using both ultrasound and CT, the current standard.
Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
Methods: Humeral torsion was measured using both ultrasound and CT in 24 collegiate-aged baseball players. Comparisons between the assessments were made using both regression and Bland-Altman plots. Reliability and precision were also established.
Results: A strong relationship existed between humeral torsion variables obtained with ultrasound and CT (R = .797, R2 = .635, P < .001). The ultrasound assessment yielded reliability coefficients ranging from .991 to .997, with approximately 1° of measurement error. The CT method’s reliability coefficients ranged from .805 to .933, with approximately 3.5° of measurement error.
Conclusion: There was a strong relationship between humeral torsion obtained with ultrasound and CT, the current standard of assessment. Ultrasound provides a reliable, valid alternative to CT for obtaining an indication of the amount of humeral torsion in the upper extremity.
ChantCBLitchfieldRGriffinSThainLM. Humeral head retroversion in competitive baseball players and its relationship to glenohumeral rotation range of motion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(9):514-520.
4.
CrockettHCGrossLBWilkKE. Osseous adaptation and range of motion at the glenohumeral joint in professional baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(1):20-26.
5.
HernigouPDuparcFHernigouA. Determining humeral retroversion with computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(10):1753-1762.
KummerFJPerkinsRZuckermanJD. The use of the bicipital groove for alignment of the humeral stem in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7(2):144-146.
8.
MyersJBOyamaSGoergerBMRucinskiTJBlackburnJTCreightonRA. Influence of humeral torsion on interpretation of posterior shoulder tightness measures in overhead athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 2009;19(5):366-371.
9.
MyersJBOyamaSRucinskiTJCreightonRA. Humeral retrotorsion in collegiate baseball pitchers with throwing-related upper extremity injury history. Sports Health. 2011;3(4):383-389.
10.
OsbahrDCCannonDLSpeerKP. Retroversion of the humerus in the throwing shoulder of college baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(3):347-353.
11.
PieperHG. Humeral torsion in the throwing arm of handball players. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26(2):247-253.
12.
ReaganKMMeisterKHorodyskiMBWernerDWCarruthersCWilkK. Humeral retroversion and its relationship to glenohumeral rotation in the shoulder of college baseball players. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(3):354-360.
13.
SchwabLMBlanchP. Humeral torsion and passive shoulder range in elite volleyball players. Phys Ther Sport. 2009;10(2):51-56.
14.
Van RoyPBaeyensJPFauvartDLanssiersRClarijsJP. Arthro-kinematics of the elbow: study of the carrying angle. Ergonomics. 2005;48(11-14):1645-1656.
15.
WhiteleyRGinnKNicholsonLAdamsR. Indirect ultrasound measurement of humeral torsion in adolescent baseball players and non-athletic adults: reliability and significance. J Sci Med Sport. 2006;9(4):310-318.
16.
WhiteleyRJAdamsRDNicholsonLLGinnKA. Shoulder proprioception is associated with humeral torsion in adolescent baseball players. Phys Ther Sport. 2008;9(4):177-184.
17.
WhiteleyRJAdamsRDNicholsonLLGinnKA. Reduced humeral torsion predicts throwing-related injury in adolescent baseballers. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(4):392-396.
YamamotoNItoiEMinagawaH. Why is the humeral retroversion of throwing athletes greater in dominant shoulders than in nondominant shoulders?J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15(5):571-575.
20.
ZampagniMLCasinoDMartelliSVisaniAMarcacciM. A protocol for clinical evaluation of the carrying angle of the elbow by anatomic landmarks. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(1):106-112.
21.
ZampagniMLCasinoDZaffagniniSVisaniAMarcacciM. Trend of the carrying angle during flexion-extension of the elbow joint: a pilot study. Orthopedics. 2008;31(1):76.
22.
ZampagniMLCasinoDZaffagniniSVisaniAAMarcacciM. Estimating the elbow carrying angle with an electrogoniometer: acquisition of data and reliability of measurements. Orthopedics. 2008;31(4):370.
