Background: To improve and standardize the sideline evaluation of sports-related concussion, the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 2 (SCAT2) was developed. This tool assesses concussion-related signs and symptoms, cognition, balance, and coordination. This newly published assessment tool has not established representative baseline data on adolescent athletes.
Hypothesis: Representative baseline SCAT2 scores in adolescent athletes will differ by gender, grade in school, and self-reported concussion history.
Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study.
Methods: Interscholastic athletes were administered the SCAT2 during a preseason concussion baseline testing session. The SCAT2 total score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with lower scores indicating poorer performance. Overall, representative values were calculated using descriptive statistics. Separate independent-samples t tests, with gender and concussion history as the independent variables, and a 1-way analysis of variance, with grade as the independent variable, were conducted to assess differences in SCAT2 total score (P < .05).
Results: There were 1134 high school athletes (872 male and 262 female) who participated. The SCAT2 total score across all participants was 88.3 ± 6.8 (range, 58-100); skewness was −0.86 ± 0.07, and kurtosis was 0.73 ± 0.14. Male athletes scored significantly lower on the SCAT2 total score (P = .03; 87.7 ± 6.8 vs 88.7 ± 6.8), and 9th graders (86.9 ± 6.8) scored significantly lower than 11th (88.7 ± 7.0) and 12th (89.0 ± 6.6) graders (P < .001). Athletes with a self-reported concussion history scored significantly lower on the SCAT2 total score than those with no concussion history (P < .001; 87.0 ± 6.8 vs 88.7 ± 6.5).
Conclusion: These data provide representative scores on the SCAT2 in adolescent athletes and show that male athletes, 9th graders, and those with a self-reported concussion history scored significantly lower than their female, upperclassmen, or nonconcussed peers.
Clinical Relevance: These results suggest that healthy adolescent athletes display variability on the SCAT2 at baseline. Therefore, clinicians should administer baseline assessments of the SCAT2 because assuming a perfect baseline score of 100 points is not appropriate in an adolescent athlete population.
BarrWBMcCreaM. Sensitivity and specificity of standardized neurocognitive testing immediately following sports concussion. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001;7:693-702.
2.
BroglioSPMacciocchiSNFerraraMS. Sensitivity of the concussion assessment battery. Neurosurgery. 2007;60:1050-1058.
3.
BroglioSPPuetzTW. The effect of sport concussion on neurocognitive function, self-report symptoms and postural control: a meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2008;38(1):53-67.
4.
EcknerJTKutcherJS. Concussion symptom scales and sideline assessment tools: a critical literature update. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2010;9(1):8-15.
5.
GesselLMFieldsSKCollinsCLDickRWComstockRD. Concussions among United States high school and collegiate athletes. J Athl Train. 2007;42(4):495-503.
6.
GuskiewiczKMBruceSLCantuRC. National Athletic Trainers’ Association Pronouncement Committee: position statement on sport-related concussion. J Athl Train. 2004;39:280-297.
7.
GuskiewiczKMRossSEMarshallSW. Postural stability and neuropsychological deficits after concussion in collegiate athletes. J Athl Train. 2001;36(3):263-273.
8.
HuntTNFerraraMS. Age-related differences in neuropsychological testing among high school athletes. J Athl Train. 2009;44(4):405-409.
9.
IversonGLLangeRT. Examination of “postconcussion-like” symptoms in a healthy sample. Appl Neuropsychol. 2003;10(3):134-144.
10.
LaBotzMMartinMRKimuraIFHetzlerRKNicholsAW. A comparison of preparticipation evaluation history form and a symptom-based concussion survey in the identification of previous head injury in collegiate athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 2005;15(2):73-78.
11.
LangloisJARutland-BrownWWaldMM. The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21(5):375-378.
12.
LovellMRIversonGLCollinsMW. Measurement of symptoms following sports-related concussion: reliability and normative data for the post-concussion scale. Appl Neuropsychol. 2006;13(3):166-174.
13.
MaddocksDLDickerGDSalingMM. The assessment of orientation following concussion in athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 1995;5:32-35.
14.
MailerBJValovich-McLeodTCBayRC. Healthy youth are reliable in reporting symptoms on a graded symptom scale. J Sport Rehabil. 2008;17(1):11-20.
15.
McCreaM. Standardized mental status testing of sports concussion. Clin J Sport Med. 2001;11:176-181.
16.
McCreaMBarrWGuskiewiczK. Standard regression-based methods for measuring recovery after sport-related concussion. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005;11:58-69.
17.
McCreaMGuskiewiczKMMarshallSW. Acute effects and recovery time following concussion in collegiate football players: the NCAA Concussion Study. JAMA. 2003;290(19):2556-2563.
18.
McCreaMKellyJPRandolphC. The Standardized Assessment of Concussion: Manual for Administration, Scoring, and Interpretation. 2nd ed.Waukesha, Wisconsin: 2000.
19.
McCreaMKellyJPRandolphC. Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC): on-site mental status evaluation of the athlete. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1998;13(2):27-35.
20.
McCroryPJohnstonKMMeeuwisseW. Summary and agreement statement of the 2nd International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Prague 2004. Clin J Sport Med. 2005;15(2):48-55.
21.
McCroryPMeeuwisseWJohnstonK. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 3rd International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2008. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(3):340-351.
22.
RheeHMilesMSHalpernCTHoldtich-DavisD. Prevalence of recurrent physical symptoms in U.S. adolescents. Pediatr Nurs. 2005;31(4):314-319, 350.
23.
RiemannBLGuskiewiczKM. Effects of mild head injury on postural stability as measured through clinical balance testing. J Athl Train. 2000;35(1):19-25.
24.
RiemannBLGuskiewiczKMShieldsEW. Relationship between clinical and forceplate measure of postural stability. J Sport Rehabil. 1999;8:71-82.
25.
SchneiderKJEmeryCAKangJSchneiderGMMeeuwisseWH. Examining Sport Concussion Assessment Tool ratings for male and female youth hockey players with and without a history of concussion. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(15):1112-1117.
26.
ShehataNWileyJPRicheaSBensonBWDuitsLMeeuwisseWH. Sport Concussion Assessment Tool: baseline values for varsity collision sport athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(10):730-734.
27.
Valovich McLeodTCBarrWBMcCreaMGuskiewiczKM. Psychometric and measurement properties of concussion assessment measures in youth sports. J Athl Train. 2006;41(4):399-408.
28.
Valovich McLeodTCBayRCHeilJMcVeighSD. Identification of sport and recreational activity concussion history through the preparticipation screening and a symptom survey in young athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 2008;18(3):235-240.
29.
Van KampenDALovellMRPardiniJECollinsMWFuFH. The “value added” of neurocognitive testing after sports-related concussion. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(10):1630-1635.
