Background: There are several large series of outcomes after ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction that have 1 or 2 javelin throwers included. To our knowledge, however, there are no reports that focus solely on the results of UCL reconstruction in this group of athletes.
Hypothesis/Purpose: We hypothesize that by using modern UCL reconstruction techniques, javelin throwers can reliably expect to return to their sport. Additionally, we review the principles behind postoperative rehabilitation in these athletes, as it differs from the usual approach used with baseball players.
Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: This was a retrospective review of 10 javelin throwers who underwent UCL reconstruction between 2006 and 2009 using the docking technique. There were 5 college and 5 high school javelin throwers. The average age was 18.5 years (range, 18-21 years). All patients, before being indicated for ligament reconstruction, failed a course of nonoperative management that included rest, physical therapy, and a structured attempt to return to throwing. Postoperatively, patients were evaluated using the Conway Scale and the Andrews-Timmerman Score.
Results: Patients were evaluated at a minimum 2-year follow-up. The average follow-up was 28.9 months after surgery (range, 24-45 months). On the Conway Scale, 9 of the 10 players had excellent outcomes (90%). There was one fair (10%) outcome. Average time to return to previous level of competition was 15 months. The mean Andrews-Timmerman Score was 97 (range, 85-100). Overall, 100% (10/10) of the patients were subjectively satisfied with their clinical outcome.
Conclusion: Similar to other overhand athletes with UCL insufficiency, javelin throwers can reliably expect to return to their previous level of play after surgical reconstruction. A thorough understanding of the unique demands placed on these athletes because of the different throwing motion is helpful when tailoring their postoperative rehabilitation protocol. Additionally, these athletes must be counseled that the postoperative course is associated with an extended period of time until return to previous level of competition when compared with baseball players.
AxeMJWickhamRSnyder-MacklerL. Data based interval throwing programs for Little League, high school, college and professional baseball pitchers. Sports Med Arthroscopy. 2001;9:24-34.
2.
BartlettRMBestRJ. The biomechanics of javelin throwing: a review. J Sports Sci. 1988;6(1):1-38.
3.
BowersALDinesJSDinesDMAltchekDW. Elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: clinical relevance and the docking technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(2S):110-117.
4.
CainELAndrewsJRDugasJR. Outcome of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow in 1281 athletes: results in 743 athletes with minimum 2-year follow up. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(12):2426-2434.
5.
ConwayJEJobeFWGlousmanREPinkM. Medial instability of the elbow in throwing athletes: treatment by repair or reconstruction of the ulnar collateral ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(1):67-83.
6.
CreightonRABachBRJrBush-JosephCA. Evaluation of the medial elbow in the throwing athlete. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2006;35(6):266-269.
7.
DinesJSElAttracheNSConwayJESmithWAhmadCS. Clinical outcomes of the Dane TJ technique to treat medial ulnar collateral ligament insufficiency of the elbow. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(12):2039-2044.
8.
DinesJSYocumLAFrankJBElAttracheNSGambardellaRAJobeFW. Revision surgery for failed elbow medial collateral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(6):1061-1065.
9.
DodsonCCThomasADinesJSNhoSJWilliamsRJ3rdAltchekDW. Medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow in throwing athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(12):1926-1932.
10.
FeltnerNEDapenaJ. Dynamics of the shoulder and elbow joints of the throwing arm of the baseball pitch. Int J Sports Biomech. 1989;5:420-450.
11.
HawDW. Avulsion fracture of the medical epicondyle of the elbow in a young javelin thrower. Br J Sports Med. 1981;15(1):47.
LevinsonM. UInar collateral ligament reconstruction. In: Cioppa-MoscaJCahillJBCavanaughJTCorradi-ScaliseDRudnickHWolffAL, eds. Postsurgical Rehabilitation Guidelines for the Orthopedic Clinician. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2006: 558-565.
14.
LiuHLeighSYuB. Sequences of upper and lower extremity motions in javelin throwing. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(13):1459-1467.
15.
LofticeJFleisigGSZhengNAndrewsJRBiomechanics of the elbow in sports. Clin Sports Med. 2004;23(4):519-530.
16.
MeroAKomiRKorjusTNavarroEGregorR. Body segment contributions to javelin throwing during the final thrust phases. J Appl Biomech. 1994;10:166-177.
17.
MorrissCBartlettRM. Biomechanical factors critical for performance in men’s javelin throw. Sports Med. 1996;21:438-446.
18.
ReinholdMWilkKReedJCrenshawKAndrewsJR. Interval sport programs: guidelines for baseball, tennis, and golf. J Orthop Sports Phys Therapy. 2002;32(6):293-298.
19.
RohrboughJTAltchekDWHymanJWilliamsRJ3rdBottsJD. Medial collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow using the docking technique. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(4):541-548.
20.
SchmittHHansmannHJBrocaiDRLoewM. Long term changes of the throwing arm of former elite javelin throwers. Int J Sports Med. 2001;22(4):275-279.
21.
TimmermanLAAndrewsJR. Arthroscopic treatment of posttraumatic elbow pain and stiffness. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(2):230-235.
22.
VitaleMAAhmadCS. The outcome of elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in overhead athletes: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(6):1193-1205.
23.
WarisW. Elbow injuries of javelin-throwers. Acta Chir Scand. 1946;93(6):563-575.
