Background: Safe return-to-play decisions after concussion can be challenging for sports medicine specialists. Neuropsychological testing is recommended to objectively measure concussion-related cognitive impairments.
Purpose: The objective of this study was to measure cognitive functioning among 3 specific athletic groups: (1) athletes with no injuries (n = 36), (2) athletes with musculoskeletal injuries (n = 18), and (3) athletes with concussion (n = 18).
Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Seventy-two intercollegiate athletes completed preseason baseline cognitive testing and follow-up assessment using the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) test battery. Injured athletes were tested within 72 hours of injury. A 1-way analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline scores was performed to determine if differences existed in cognitive test scores among the 3 groups.
Results: A group of athletes with concussion performed significantly worse than a group of athletes with no injuries on the following subtests of the ANAM at follow-up: Code Substitution Learning, Match to Sample, and Simple Reaction. Athletes with musculoskeletal injuries performed significantly worse than those with no injury on the Match to Sample subtest. No significant differences between athletes with concussion and athletes with musculoskeletal injuries were found on all ANAM subtests.
Conclusion: Concussion produces cognitive impairment in the acute recovery period. Interestingly, athletes with musculoskeletal injuries also display a degree of cognitive impairment as measured by computerized tests.
Clinical Relevance: Although these findings support previous research that neuropsychological tests can effectively measure concussion-related cognitive impairment, this study provides evidence that athletic injury, in general, also may produce a degree of cognitive disruption. Therefore, a narrow interpretation of scores of neuropsychological tests in a sports concussion context should be avoided.
BleibergJCernichANCameronK. Duration of cognitive impairment after sports concussion. Neurosurgery. 2004;54(5):1073-1078, discussion 1078-1080.
2.
BleibergJHalpernELReevesDDanielJC. Future directions for the neuropsychological assessment of sports concussion. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1998;13(2):36-44.
3.
BleibergJKaneRLReevesDLGarmoeWSHalpernE. Factor analysis of computerized and traditional tests used in mild brain injury research. Clin Neuropsychol. 2000;14(3):287-294.
CollieAMaruffPMakdissiMMcCroryPMcStephenMDarbyD. CogSport: reliability and correlation with conventional cognitive tests used in postconcussion medical evaluations. Clin J Sport Med. 2003;13(1):28-32.
6.
CollinsMWGrindelSHLovellMR. Relationship between concussion and neuropsychological performance in college football players. JAMA. 1999;282(10):964-970.
7.
EchemendiaRJHerringSBailesJ. Who should conduct and interpret the neuropsychological assessment in sports-related concussion?Br J Sports Med. 2009;43Suppl 1:i32-i35.
8.
EchemendiaRJPutukianMMackinRSJulianLShossN. Neuropsychological test performance prior to and following sports-related mild traumatic brain injury. Clin J Sport Med. 2001;11(1):23-31.
9.
ErlangerDFeldmanDKutnerK. Development and validation of a web-based neuropsychological test protocol for sports-related return-to-play decision-making. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;18(3):293-316.
10.
FieldMCollinsMWLovellRMaroonJ. Does age play a role in recovery from sports-related concussion? A comparison of high school and collegiate athletes. J Pediatr. 2003;142(5):546-553.
11.
GuskiewiczKMRossSEMarshallSW. Postural stability and neuropsychological deficits after concussion in collegiate athletes. J Athl Train. 2001;36(3):263-273.
12.
Hinton-BayreAGeffenGGeffenLBMcFarlandKFriisP. Concussion in contact sports: reliable change indicies of impairment and recovery. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1999;21(1):70-86.
13.
Hinton-BayreAGeffenGMcFarlandK. Mild head injury and speed of information processing: a prospective study of professional rugby league players. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997;19(2):275-289.
14.
HolmesAJPizzagalliDA. Task feedback effects on conflict monitoring and executive control: relationship to subclinical measures of depression. Emotion. 2007;7(1):68-76.
15.
HutchisonMMainwaringLMComperPRichardsDWBisschopSM. Differential emotional responses of varsity athletes to concussion and musculoskeletal injuries. Clin J Sport Med. 2009;19(1):13-19.
16.
IbanezJArikanFPedrazaS. Reliability of clinical guidelines in the detection of patients at risk following mild head injury: results of a prospective study. J Neurosurg. 2004;100(5):825-834.
17.
IversonGLLovellMRCollinsMW. Validity of ImPACT for measuring processing speed following sports-related concussion. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005;27(6):683-689.
18.
JonesWPLoeSAKrachSKRagerRYJonesHM. Automated neuropsychological assessment metrics (ANAM) and Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive ability: a concurrent validity study. Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22:305-320.
19.
KaneRLRoebuck-SpencerTShortPKabatMWilkenJ. Identifying and monitoring cognitive deficits in clinical populations using Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) tests. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22Suppl 1:S115-S126.
20.
MacciocchiSNBarthJTAlvesWRimelRWJaneJA. Neuropsychological functioning and recovery after mild head injury in collegiate athletes. Neurosurgery. 1996;39(3):510-514.
21.
MachuldaMMBergquistTFItoVChewS. Relationship between stress, coping, and postconcussion symptoms in a healthy adult population. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1998;13(5):415-424.
22.
MainwaringLMBisschopSMGreenR. Emotional reaction of varsity athletes to sport-related concussion. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2004;26(1):119-135.
23.
MainwaringLMHutchisonMBisschopSMComperPRichardsDW. Emotional response to sport concussion compared to ACL injury. Brain Inj. 2010;24(4):589-597.
24.
MathewsA. Why worry? The cognitive function of anxiety. Behav Res Ther. 1990;28(6):455-468.
25.
McCreaM. Standardized mental status testing on the sideline after sport-related concussion. J Athl Train. 2001;36(3):274-279.
26.
McCreaMBarrWBGuskiewiczK. Standard regression-based methods for measuring recovery after sport-related concussion. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005;11(1):58-69.
27.
McCreaMGuskiewiczKMMarshallSW. Acute effects and recovery time following concussion in collegiate football players: the NCAA Concussion Study. JAMA. 2003;290(19):2556-2563.
28.
McCreaMHammekeTOlsenGLeoPGuskiewiczK. Unreported concussion in high school football players: implications for prevention. Clin J Sport Med. 2004;14(1):13-17.
29.
McCroryPMeeuwisseWJohnstonK. Consensus statement on Concussion in Sport 3rd International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2008. Clin J Sport Med. 2009;19(3):185-200.
30.
ReevesDLBleibergJRoebuck-SpencerT. Reference values for performance on the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics V3.0 in an active duty military sample. Mil Med. 2006;171(10):982-994.
31.
ReevesDLWinterKPBleibergJKaneRL. ANAM genogram: historical perspectives, description, and current endeavors. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22Suppl 1:S15-S37.
32.
RichardsDComperPMainwaringLHutchisonM. Sensitivity and specificity of neuropsychological tests in concussion. 3rd International Conference on Concussion in Sports abstract. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:i98.
33.
SegalowitzSJMahaneyPSantessoDLMacGregorLDywanJWillerB. Retest reliability in adolescents of a computerized neuropsychological battery used to assess recovery from concussion. Neurorehabilitation. 2007;22(3):243-251.
34.
WilkenJAKaneRSullivanCL. The utility of computerized neuropsychological assessment of cognitive dysfunction in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2003;9(2):119-127.
35.
WoodardJMakerCTabanicoF. A validation study of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) in non-concussed high school players. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2002;8(2):175.
