CuomoPRamaKRBullAMAmisAA. The effects of different tensioning strategies on knee laxity and graft tension after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(12):2083-2090.
2.
HemmerichAvan der MerweWBatterhamMVaughanCL. Knee rotational laxity in a randomized comparison of single- versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(1):48-56.
3.
KatoYInghamSJKramerSSmolinskiPSaitoAFuFH. Effect of tunnel position for anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction on knee biomechanics in a porcine model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(1):2-10.
4.
KopfSPomboMWSzczodryMIrrgangJJFuFH. Size variability of the human anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(1):108-113.
5.
MaeTShinoKMiyamaT. Single- versus two-femoral socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique: biomechanical analysis using a robotic simulator. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(7):708-716.
6.
TashmanSCollonDAndersonKKolowichPAnderstW. Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(4):975-983.
7.
YagiMWongEKKanamoriADebskiREFuFHWooSL. Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(5):660-666.
