Background: High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a method used to treat medial compartmental osteoarthritis in the knee. The realignment of the knee changes the loading patterns within the joint and may allow for regeneration of articular cartilage. Magnetic resonance imaging methods can be used to assess the quality of the regenerated cartilage.
Hypothesis: Altering mechanical alignment through HTO will have predictable effects on articular cartilage, allowing cartilage preservation and possible regeneration. Quality of regenerated cartilage will be inferior to normal articular cartilage.
Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: Ten patients undergoing medial opening wedge HTO were evaluated using dGEMRIC methods (ie, delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage) preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after HTO. Magnetic resonance images were evaluated by hand segmentation, and T1Gd relaxation times reflective of glycosaminoglycan content were determined for these regions of interest using magnetic resonance imaging analysis software.
Results: The lateral compartment displayed higher T1Gd values than the medial compartment at baseline. Initially, a decrease in T1Gd values on the medial side were observed for all patients at 6 months and remained reduced for all but 2 participants at 1 year and 2 years after HTO. However, on the medial side after 6 months, the rate of change for T1Gd values shifted from being negative (−9.6 milliseconds per month) to being positive (1.7 milliseconds per month). A positive change in the T1Gd of the medial tibial plateau was responsible for the positive overall change in the medial compartment. There was no significant difference in the rate of change on the lateral side (P = .141), with the average over the 2-year period being a decrease of 2.28 milliseconds per month.
Conclusion: Medial opening wedge HTO provides subjective improvements in pain and quality of life, but the potential benefit of allowing articular cartilage preservation and possible regeneration is not well established. Results showed that after a nonweightbearing period, the rate of change in the medial compartment changes from negative to positive, indicating the potential for articular cartilage recovery secondary to an improved mechanical environment.
BashirAGrayMLBoutinRDBursteinD. Glycosaminoglycan in articular cartilage: in vivo assessment with delayed Gd(DTPA)(2-)-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 1997;205(2):551-558.
2.
BashirAGrayMLBursteinD. Gd-DTPA2- as a measure of cartilage degradation. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36(5):665-673.
3.
BörjessonMWeidenhielmLMattssonEOlssonE. Gait and clinical measurements in patients with knee osteoarthritis after surgery: a prospective 5-year follow-up study. Knee. 2005;12(2):121-127.
4.
BriemKRamseyDKNewcombWRudolphKSSnyder-MacklerL. Effects of the amount of valgus correction for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis on clinical outcome, knee kinetics and muscle co-contraction after opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Orthop Res. 2007;25(3):311-318.
5.
BursteinDVelyvisJScottKT. Protocol issues for delayed Gd(DTPA)2-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) for clinical evaluation of articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med. 2001;45:36-41.
6.
CicuttiniFWlukaAHankinJWangY. Longitudinal study of the relationship between knee angle and tibiofemoral cartilage volume in subjects with knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43(3):321-324.
7.
EcksteinFBursteinDLinkTM. Quantitative MRI of cartilage and bone: degenerative changes in osteoarthritis. NMR Biomed. 2006;19(7):822-854.
8.
KanamiyaTNaitoMHaraMYoshimuraI. The influences of biomechanical factors on cartilage regeneration after high tibial osteotomy for knees with medial compartment osteoarthritis: clinical and arthroscopic observations. Arthoscopy. 2002;18(7):725-729.
9.
KoshinoTWadaSAraYSaitoT. Regeneration of degenerated articular cartilage after high tibial valgus osteotomy for medial compartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee. 2003;10(3):229-236.
10.
LohmanderLS. Markers of altered metabolism in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2004;70:28-35.
11.
LohmanderLSIonescuMJugessurHPooleAR. Changes in joint cartilage aggrecan after knee injury and in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(3):534-544.
12.
National Health and Medical Research Council. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia; 2004.
13.
NieminenMTTöyräsJLaasanenMSSilvennoinenJHelminenHJJurvelinJS. Prediction of biomechanical properties of articular cartilage with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. J Biomech. 2004;37(3):321-328.
14.
OwmanHTideriusCJNeumanPNyquistFDahlbergLE. Association between findings on delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage and future knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(6):1727-1730.
15.
ParkerDAViskontasD. Osteotomy for the early varus arthritic knee. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2007;15(1):3-14.
16.
RamseyDKSnyder-MacklerLLewekMNewcombWRudolphKS. Effect of anatomic realignment on muscle function during gait in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(3):389-397.
17.
RoosEMDahlbergL. Positive effects of moderate exercise on glycosaminoglycan content in knee cartilage; a four-month, randomized, controlled trial in patients at risk of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(11):3507-3514.
18.
RoosEMLohmanderLS. The knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:64.
19.
TideriusCJOlssonLELeanderPEkbergODahlbergL. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) in early knee osteoarthritis. Magn Reson Med. 2003;49(3):488-492.
20.
TideriusCJSvenssonJLeanderPOlaTDahlbergL. dGEMRIC (delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage) indicates adaptive capacity of human knee cartilage. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51(2):286-290.
21.
TrattnigSMamischTCPinkerK. Differentiating normal hyaline cartilage from post-surgical repair tissue using fast gradient echo imaging in delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) at 3 Tesla. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(6):1251-1259.
22.
VanwanseeleBLucchinettiEStussiE. The effects of immobilization on the characteristics of articular cartilage: current concepts and future directions. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002;10:408-419.
23.
WilliamsAGillisAMcKenzieC. Glycosaminoglycan distribution in cartilage as determined by delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC): potential clinical applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:167-172.
24.
WilliamsASharmaLMcKenzieCPrasadPVBursteinD. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage in knee osteoarthritis: findings at different radiographic stages of disease and relationship to malalignment. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(11):3528-3535.
25.
YoungAAStanwellPWilliamsA. Glycosaminoglycan content of knee cartilage following posterior cruciate ligament rupture demonstrated by delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC): a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(12):2763-2767.
