Background: The authors developed a novel technique to improve tendon-bone attachment by hybridizing calcium phosphate with a tendon graft using an alternate soaking process. However, the long-term result is unclear regarding the function of the anterior cruciate ligament–reconstructed knee and the interface between the tendon and the bone.
Purpose: To clarify the effects of the calcium phosphate–hybridized tendon graft by analyzing the biomechanical behavior of the reconstructed knee, bone tunnel wall, and interface between the tendon and the bone, compared with the untreated knee at 1 year in goats.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: The authors analyzed knee kinematics and in situ forces in a replacement graft, as well as computed tomography for new bone formation in the bone tunnel and histology of the tendon-bone interface, with and without the calcium phosphate–hybridized tendon graft.
Results: In the calcium phosphate group, the anteroposterior translations in the reconstructed knees were shorter and the corresponding in situ forces greater than those in the control group at full extension and 60° of knee flexion. The in situ force in response to applied internal tibial torques in the calcium phosphate group at full extension was greater than that in the control group. More new bone formation in the bone tunnel and cartilage layer between the tendon-bone interface at the joint aperture site of the calcium phosphate group was observed than in the control group.
Conclusion: The calcium phosphate–hybridized tendon graft promotes knee stability because of the firm tendon-bone healing with cartilage layer and new bone formation.
Clinical Relevance: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the calcium phosphate–hybridized tendon graft may lead to good long-term outcomes.
BenjaminMEvansEJCoppL. The histology of tendon attachments to bone in man. J Anat. 1986;149:89-100.
2.
CooperRRMisolS. Tendon and ligament insertion: a light and electron microscopic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1-20.
3.
FujieHLivesayGAFujitaMWooSL. Forces and moments in six-DOF at the human knee joint: mathematical description for control. J Biomech. 1996;29:1577-1585.
4.
FujieHLivesayGAWooSLKashiwaguchiSBlomstromG. The use of a universal force-moment sensor to determine in-situ forces in ligaments: a new methodology. J Biomech Eng. 1995;117:1-7.
5.
FujieHMabuchiKWooSLLivesayGAAraiSTsukamotoY. The use of robotics technology to study human joint kinematics: a new methodology. J Biomech Eng. 1993;115:211-217.
6.
GranaWAEgleDMMahnkenRGoodhartCW. An analysis of autograft fixation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a rabbit model. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22:344-351.
7.
HöherJLivesayGAMaCBWithrowJDFuFHWooSL. Hamstring graft motion in the femoral bone tunnel when using titanium button/polyester tape fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7:215-219.
8.
IshibashiYRudyTWLivesayGAStoneJDFuFHWooSL. The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation site at the tibia on knee stability: evaluation using a robotic testing system. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:177-182.
9.
JacksonDWGroodESGoldsteinJD. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and allograft used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the goat model. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:176-185.
10.
KneseKHBiermannH. Die Knochenbildung an Sehnen und Bandansätzen im Bereich ursprünglich chondraler Apophysen. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1958;49:142-187.
11.
KurosakaMYoshiyaSAndrishJT. A biomechanical comparison of different surgical techniques of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1987;15:225-229.
12.
LivesayGAFujieHKashiwaguchiSMorrowDAFuFHWooSL. Determination of the in-situ forces and force distribution within the human anterior cruciate ligament. Ann Biomed Eng. 1995;23:467-474.
13.
MaCBPapageorgiouCDDebskiREWooSL. Interaction between the ACL graft and MCL in combined ACL+MCL knee injury using a goat model. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:387-393.
14.
MaedaAShinoKHoribeSNakataKBuccafuscaG. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with multistranded autogenous semitendinosus tendon. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:504-509.
15.
MessnerK. Postnatal development of the cruciate ligament insertions in the rat knee. Acta Anat (Basel). 1998;160:261-268.
16.
MutsuzakiHSakaneMHattoriSKobayashiHOchiaiN. Firm anchoring between calcium phosphate-hybridized tendon and bone for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a goat model. Biomed Mater. 2009;4:045013 (7 pp.).
17.
MutsuzakiHSakaneMItoA. The interaction between osteoclast-like cells and osteoblasts mediated by nanophase calcium phosphate-hybridized tendons. Biomaterials. 2005;26:1027-1034.
18.
MutsuzakiHSakaneMNakajimaH. Calcium-phosphate-hybridized tendon directly promotes regeneration of tendon-bone insertion. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;70:319-327.
19.
NgGYOakesBWDeaconOWMcLeanIDLampardD. Biomechanics of patellar tendon autograft for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament in the goat: three-year study. J Orthop Res. 1995;13:602-608.
20.
RodeoSAKawamuraSMaCB. The effect of osteoclastic activity on tendon-to-bone healing: an experimental study in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2250-2259.
21.
RudyTWLivesayGAWooSL-YFuFH. A combined robotic/universal force sensor approach to determine in situ forces of knee ligaments. J Biomech. 1996;29:1357-1360.
22.
SakaneMFoxRJWooSLYLivesayGALiGFuFH. In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads. J Orthop Res. 1997;15:285-293.
23.
SchneiderH. Zur Struktur der Sehnenansatzzonen. Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch. 1956;119:431-456.
24.
SwensonTMHarnerCDFuFH. Endoscopic ACL reconstruction using a quadrupled semitendinosus graft. Pittsburgh Orthop J. 1995;6:25-33.
25.
TaguchiTKishidaAAkashiM. Hydroxyapatite formation on/in hydrogels using a novel alternate soaking process. Chem Lett. 1998;8:711-712.
