Background: The tissue-suture interface remains the most common site of failure in rotator cuff repairs. Improving stitch strengths may lead to lower failure rates.
Purpose: To compare biomechanical properties of 3 self-cinching stitches to the simple, mattress, modified Mason-Allen, and massive cuff stitches.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: In sum, 336 sheep infraspinatus tendon grafts were randomized among 7 stitches. Each graft was cyclically loaded on a mechanical testing system from 5 to 30 N for 20 cycles and then loaded to failure. A mixed-effect multivariate regression model was used to test significance of suture type on cyclic elongation, peak-to-peak displacement, and ultimate load. Estimated means and standard deviations are reported from the regression model.
Results: Ultimate load for the simple stitch was significantly lower than for the other stitches. The lasso-loop and mattress stitch demonstrated similar ultimate loads. The double-cinch had a higher ultimate load than the lasso-loop or mattress stitch, although it was significantly weaker than the modified Mason-Allen, lasso-mattress, and massive cuff. The lasso-mattress had a superior ultimate load to the modified Mason-Allen and a similar ultimate load to the massive cuff stitch. One significant difference was found in cyclic elongation (1.42 mm for the simple to 1.80 mm for the double-cinch), and the cinching mechanism accounted for 0.2-mm higher elongation.
Conclusion: Self-cinching stitches lead to superior tissue-holding strength at the tissue-suture interface when compared with equivalent non-self-cinching stitches. Self-cinching stitches have greater elongation values. How these differences in cyclic elongation clinically influence gap formation at the repair site is unknown. The greater displacement seen in the self-cinching stitches is a potential concern because minimal gap formation is desired for a strong repair.
Clinical Relevance: The lasso-loop stitch is a stronger alternative to a simple stitch, and the double-cinch and lasso-mattress stitches are stronger alternatives to a mattress stitch.
BurkhartSSDiaz PagànJLWirthMAAthanasiouKA. Cyclic loading of anchor-based rotator cuff repairs: confirmation of the tension overload phenomenon and comparison of suture anchor fixation with transosseous fixation. Arthroscopy. 1997;13(6):720-724.
2.
CumminsCAMurrellGA. Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(2):128-133.
3.
FranceEPPaulosLEHarnerCDStraightCB. Biomechanical evaluation of rotator cuff fixation methods. Am J Sports Med. 1989;17(2):176-181.
4.
GaziellyDFGleyzePMontagnonC. Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;304:43-53.
5.
GerberCSchneebergerAGBeckMSchlegelU. Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76(3):371-380.
6.
GerberCSchneebergerAGPerrenSMNyffelerRW. Experimental rotator cuff repair: a preliminary study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81(9):1281-1290.
7.
HarrymanDT2ndMackLAWangKY. Repairs of the rotator cuff: correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73(7):982-989.
8.
LafosseLVan RaebroeckxABrzoskaR. A new technique to improve tissue grip: “the lasso-loop stitch.”Arthroscopy. 2006;22(11):1246.e1-e3.
9.
MaCBMacgillivrayJDClabeauxJLeeSOtisJC. Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff stitches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(6):1211-1216.
10.
MacGillivrayJDMaCB. An arthroscopic stitch for massive rotator cuff tears: the Mac stitch. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(6):669-671.
11.
PonceBAAhluwaliaRSMazzoccaADGobezieRGWarnerJJMillettPJ. Biomechanical and clinical evaluation of a novel lesser tuberosity repair technique in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(Suppl 2):1-8.
12.
ScheibelMTHabermeyerP. A modified Mason-Allen technique for rotator cuff repair using suture anchors. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(3):330-333.
13.
SchneebergerAGvon RollAKalbererFJacobHAGerberC. Mechanical strength of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques: an in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(12):2152-2160.
14.
SileoMJRuotoloCRNelsonCOSerra-HsuFPanchalAP. A biomechanical comparison of the modified Mason-Allen stitch and massive cuff stitch in vitro. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(3):235-240.
15.
ThomazeauHBoukobzaEMorcetNChaperonJLanglaisF. Prediction of rotator cuff repair results by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;344:275-283.
16.
ToussaintBSchnaserELafosseLBahurelJGobezieR. A new approach to improving the tissue grip of the medial-row repair in the suture-bridge technique: the “modified lasso-loop stitch.”Arthroscopy. 2009;25(6):691-695.
17.
YankeAProvencherMTColeBJ. Arthroscopic double-row and “transosseous-equivalent” rotator cuff repair. Am J Orthop. 2007;36(6):294-297.
