Background: The majority of clinical outcome studies of type II superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) repair assess patients younger than age 40. Biceps tenotomy or tenodesis is often recommended for patients older than age 40 with superior labrum-biceps complex injury.
Hypothesis: There is no difference in patient clinical outcomes comparing arthroscopic type II SLAP repair in patients younger or older than age 40.
Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Fifty-two patients stratified to groups younger than age 40 (21 patients; average age, 32.9 years) and older than age 40 (31 patients; average age, 55.1 years) were identified at a minimum 2-year follow-up (average, 28 months) after type II SLAP repair by a single surgeon using suture anchors. Outcome scores included American Shoulder and Elbow Society scores (ASES), Short Form-12 scores, Simple Shoulder Test scores, and visual analog pain scale.
Results: At follow-up, there was no statistical difference in visual analog pain scale (P = .16), ASES scores (P = .07), Simple Shoulder Test scores (P =.41), Short Form-12 testing, or range of motion testing. Patients older than age 40 noted their shoulder to be 87% of normal; 26 of 31 (84%) were satisfied to completely satisfied, and 28 of 31 (90%) would have the surgery again. Patients younger than 40 noted their shoulder to be approximately 89% of normal; 20 of 21 (95%) were satisfied to completely satisfied, and 18 of 21 (86%) would have the same procedure performed again.
Conclusion: Our findings support that arthroscopic treatment of isolated type II SLAP repair using suture anchors can yield good to excellent results in patients older and younger than age 40. We found no statistically significant difference in patient outcome scores, satisfaction levels, or willingness to have the same procedure again when comparing arthroscopic SLAP repair in patients younger or older than age 40.
AltchekDWWarrenRFWickiewiczTLOrtizG. Arthroscopic labral debridement: a three-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(6):702-706.
2.
AndrewsJRBroussardTSCarsonWG. Arthroscopy of the shoulder in the management of partial tears of the rotator cuff: a preliminary report. Arthroscopy. 1985;1(2):117-122.
3.
CohenDBColemanSDrakosMC. Outcomes of isolated type II SLAP lesions treated with arthroscopic fixation using a bioabsorbable tack. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(2):136-142.
4.
ColemanSHCohenDBDrakosMC. Arthroscopic repair of type II superior labral anterior posterior lesions with and without acromioplasty: a clinical analysis of 50 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(5):749-753.
5.
CordascoFASteinmannSFlatowELBiglianiLU. Arthroscopic treatment of glenoid labral tears. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21(3):425-431.
6.
DiRaimondoCAAlexanderJWNoblePCLoweWRLintnerDM. A biomechanical comparison of repair techniques for type II SLAP lesions. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(3):727-733.
7.
EnadJGKurtzCA. Isolated and combined Type II SLAP repairs in a military population. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(11):1382-1389.
8.
FieldLDSavoieFH3rd. Arthroscopic suture repair of superior labral detachment lesions of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21(6):783-790.
9.
FranceschiFLongoUGRuzziniLRizzelloGMaffulliNDenaroV. No advantages in repairing a type II superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesion when associated with rotator cuff repair in patients over age 50: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(2):247-253.
10.
IdeJMaedaSTakagiK. Sports activity after arthroscopic superior labral repair using suture anchors in overhead-throwing athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(4):507-514.
11.
KimSHHaKIKimSHChoiHJ. Results of arthroscopic treatment of superior labral lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(6):981-985.
12.
MaffetMWGartsmanGMMoseleyB. Superior labrum-biceps tendon complex lesions of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(1):93-98.
13.
MileskiRASnyderSJ. Superior labral lesions in the shoulder: pathoanatomy and surgical management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998;6(2):121-131.
14.
MorganCDBurkhartSSPalmeriMGillespieM. Type II SLAP lesions: three subtypes and their relationships to superior instability and rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 1998;14(6):553-565.
15.
NamEKSnyderSJ. The diagnosis and treatment of superior labrum, anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(5):798-810.
16.
NeriBRVollmerEAKvitneRS. Isolated type II superior labral anterior posterior lesions: age-related outcome of arthroscopic fixation. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(5):937-942.
17.
PagnaniMJSpeerKPAltchekDWWarrenRFDinesDM. Arthroscopic fixation of superior labral lesions using a biodegradable implant: a preliminary report. Arthroscopy. 1995;11(2):194-198.
18.
PanossianVRMihataTTiboneJEFitzpatrickMJMcGarryMHLeeTQ. Biomechanical analysis of isolated type II SLAP lesions and repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(5):529-534.
19.
PayneLZJoklP. The results of arthroscopic debridement of glenoid labral tears based on tear location. Arthroscopy. 1993;9(5):560-565.
20.
ReschHKathreinAGolserKSpernerG. Arthroscopic and percutaneous bone screw techniques with a new screw system [in German]. Unfallchirurg. 1992;95(2):91-98.
21.
RheeYGLeeDHLimCT. Unstable isolated SLAP lesion: clinical presentation and outcome of arthroscopic fixation. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(9):1099.
22.
SamaniJEMarstonSBBussDD. Arthroscopic stabilization of type II SLAP lesions using an absorbable tack. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(1):19-24.
23.
SnyderSJBanasMPKarzelRP. An analysis of 140 injuries to the superior glenoid labrum. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4(4):243-248.
24.
SnyderSJKarzelRPDel PizzoWFerkelRDFriedmanMJ. SLAP lesions of the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 1990;6(4):274-279.
25.
WalchGLiotardJPBoileauPNoelE. Postero-superior glenoid impingement: another impingement of the shoulder [in French]. J Radiol. 1993;74(1):47-50.
26.
YianEWangCMillettPJWarnerJJ. Arthroscopic repair of SLAP lesions with a bioknotless suture anchor. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(5):547-551.
27.
YonedaMHirookaASaitoSYamamotoTOchiTShinoK. Arthroscopic stapling for detached superior glenoid labrum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73(5):746-750.
