Background: Clavicle fractures have historically been managed nonoperatively. Recent literature suggests a subset of clavicle fractures may be best treated with primary surgical treatment.
Purpose: To review the National Football League (NFL) experience in the management of middle-third clavicle fractures over a 5-year period.
Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: A retrospective review of clavicle fractures that occurred during a 5-season period was obtained from the NFL Injury Surveillance System. A detailed questionnaire was also sent to the medical staff of all 32 NFL teams.
Results: Nineteen players sustained a middle-third clavicle fracture over the 5-year period. Six fractures were nondisplaced or minimally displaced. All 6 healed at an average time of 7.3 weeks. Thirteen fractures were 100% displaced. Six of the 13 underwent acute surgical fixation that resulted in fracture healing without complication at an average of 8.8 weeks. The remaining 7 players with a completely displaced fracture were initially treated nonoperatively. Three of these 7 healed clinically without sequela at an average of 13.3 weeks after injury; however, 4 players sustained a refracture within 1 year of the initial injury.
Conclusion: Over the past 5 years, nearly 50% of NFL players with a completely displaced middle-third clavicle fracture were treated successfully with acute surgical fixation without sequela and healed at an average of 8.8 weeks. Three of these players were able to return to play during the same season. In addition, 4 of 7 players initially treated nonoperatively for a completely displaced middle-third clavicle fracture refractured their clavicle within a 1-year period from their initial injury. The 4 players missed an average of 1.5 seasons because of their clavicle injury and subsequent clinical course. Based on this review, it may be reasonable to consider acute surgical treatment of this injury in the NFL player to enable a successful clinical outcome in a predictable time frame.
BrinkerMREdwardsTBO’ConnorDP. Estimating the risk of nonunion following nonoperative treatment of a clavicular fracture [letter]. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:676-677.
4.
Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(1):1-10.
FriggARillmannPPerrenTGerberMRyfC. Intramedullary nailing of clavicular midshaft fractures with the titanium elastic nail. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:352-359.
7.
HillJMcGuireMCrosbyL. Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:537-539.
8.
HuangJIToogoodPChenMRWilberJHCoopermanDR. Clavicular anatomy and the applicability of precontoured plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2260-2265.
9.
IannottiMRCrosbyLAStaffordPGraysonGGouletR. Effects of plate location and selection on the stability of midshaft clavicle osteotomies: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:457-462.
10.
KimWMcKeeM. Management of acute clavicle fractures. Orthop Clin N Am. 2008;39:491-505.
11.
McKeeMPendersenEJonesC. Deficits following nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:35-40.
12.
McKeeMSeilerJJupiterJ. The application of the limited contact dynamic compression plate in the upper extremity: an analysis of 114 consecutive cases. Injury. 1995;26:661-666.
13.
NeerC. Nonunion of the clavicle. JAMA. 1960;172:1006-1011.
14.
NowakJHolgerssonMLarssonS. Can we predict long-term sequelae after fractures of the clavicle based on initial findings? A prospective study with nine to ten years of follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13:479-486.
15.
PoigenfurstJRappoldGFischerW. Plating of fresh clavicular fractures: results in 122 operations. Injury. 1992;23:237-241.
16.
RobinsonCCourt-BrownCMcQueenMWakefieldA. Estimating the risk of nonunion following nonoperative treatment of a clavicular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1359-1365.
17.
RoweCR. An atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclavicular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1968;58:29-42.
18.
StraussEJEgolKAFranceMAKovalKJZuckermanJD. Complications of intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:280-284.
19.
ZlowodzkiMZelleBAColePAJerayKMcKeeMD; Evidence-Based Orthopedic Trauma Working Group. Treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures: systematic review of 2144 fractures. On behalf of the Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19:504-507.
