Background: Biplane radiologic evaluation is indispensable for the correct diagnosis of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. Thus far, no functional radiographic techniques have been quantified to evaluate horizontal instability in acute AC joint dislocations.
Hypothesis: Supine dynamic axillary lateral shoulder views detect horizontal instability of the distal clavicle in patients with acute AC joint dislocations.
Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
Methods: Twenty-five consecutive patients with a mean age of 39 ± 14 years with acute AC joint injury underwent biplane radiologic evaluation, including a conventional Zanca view and an axillary lateral view in a sitting position. In addition, supine axillary lateral views with the arm in 90° of abduction and 60° of flexion and extension were taken to evaluate the horizontal dynamics of the distal clavicle. The gleno-acromio-clavicular angle (GACA) was introduced and used to quantify the horizontal clavicular dynamics in terms of angle differences. The unaffected shoulders served as the control group.
Results: Superior dislocation of the lateral clavicle in the Zanca view was classified as Rockwood type II in 7 patients, type III in 15, and type V in 3. The axillary lateral view in a sitting position showed posterior dislocation of the distal clavicle in 8 patients (Rockwood type IV injury). Dynamic radiologic evaluation revealed an average GACA difference between the neutral and anterior position of the arm of 7.1° ± 5.5° for the unaffected shoulder. In the injured AC joints, 11 patients showed no radiologic evidence of horizontal instability (group A) with a GACA difference of 7.1° ± 4.8°. Increased anteroposterior translation was evident in 14 patients (group B) with a GACA difference of 30.3° ± 14.3° (P < .001).
Conclusion: Functional axillary radiologic evaluation seems to represent a simple imaging tool to reveal dynamic horizontal instability.
Clinical Relevance: Horizontal instability of the distal clavicle in acute AC joint injuries represents an indication for surgical treatment. Dynamic axillary radiologic evaluation may detect previously missed unstable injuries. This evaluation might be relevant when deciding on surgical AC joint stabilization.
AlexanderOM. Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. Radiography. 1949;15(179):260.
2.
AlyasFCurtisMSpeedCSaifuddinAConnellD. MR imaging appearances of acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Radiographics. 2008;28(2):463-479.
3.
BakerJENicandriGTYoungDCOwenJRWayneJS. A cadaveric study examining acromioclavicular joint congruity after different methods of coracoclavicular loop repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(6):595-598.
4.
BergfeldJAAndrishJTClancyWG. Evaluation of the acromioclavicular joint following first- and second-degree sprains. Am JSports Med. 1978;6(4):153-159.
5.
CadenatF. The treatment of dislocations and fractures of the outer end of the clavicle. Int Clin. 1917;1:145-169.
6.
ChoiSWLeeTJMoonKHChoKJLeeSY. Minimally invasive coracoclavicular stabilization with suture anchors for acute acromioclavicular dislocation. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(5):961-965.
7.
CosticRSLabriolaJERodoskyMWDebskiRE. Biomechanical rationale for development of anatomical reconstructions of coracoclavicular ligaments after complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1929-1936.
8.
CoxJS. The fate of the acromioclavicular joint in athletic injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1981;9(1):50-53.
9.
DawsonPAAdamsonGJPinkMM. Relative contribution of acromioclavicular joint capsule and coracoclavicular ligaments to acromioclavicular stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(2):237-244.
10.
DimakopoulosPPanagopoulosASyggelosSAPanagiotopoulosELambirisE. Double-loop suture repair for acute acromioclavicular joint disruption. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(7):1112-1119.
11.
ErnbergLAPotterHG. Radiographic evaluation of the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints. Clin Sports Med. 2003;22(2):255-275.
12.
FialkaCKrestanCRStampflPTriebKAharinejadSVecseiV. Visualization of intraarticular structures of the acromioclavicular joint in an ex vivo model using a dedicated MRI protocol. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(5):1126-1131.
13.
HeersGGotzJSchubertT. MR imaging of the intraarticular disk of the acromioclavicular joint: a comparison with anatomical, histological and in-vivo findings. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36(1):23-28.
14.
HeersGHedtmannA. Correlation of ultrasonographic findings to Tossy’s and Rockwood’s classification of acromioclavicular joint injuries. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31(6):725-732.
15.
JariRCosticRSRodoskyMWDebskiRE. Biomechanical function of surgical procedures for acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(3):237-245.
16.
JiangCWangMRongG. Proximally based conjoined tendon transfer for coracoclavicular reconstruction in the treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(suppl 2 Pt 2):299-308.
17.
LuisGEYongCKSinghDASenguptaSChoonDS. Acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a comparative biomechanical study of the palmaris-longus tendon graft reconstruction with other augmentative methods in cadaveric models. J Orthop Surg. 2007;2:22.
18.
MazzoccaADSantangeloSAJohnsonSTRiosCGDumonskiMLArcieroRA. A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(2):236-246.
19.
MazzoccaADSpangJTRodriguezRR. Biomechanical and radiographic analysis of partial coracoclavicular ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(7):1397-1402.
20.
MouhsineEGarofaloRCrevoisierXFarronA. Grade I and II acromioclavicular dislocations: results of conservative treatment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(6):599-602.
RockwoodCJWilliamsGYoungD. Disorders of the acromioclavicular joint. In: RockwoodCJMatsenFAIII, eds. The Shoulder. 2nd ed.Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998:483-553.
23.
SaharaWSugamotoKMuraiMTanakaHYoshikawaH. 3D kinematic analysis of the acromioclavicular joint during arm abduction using vertically open MRI. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(9):1823-1831.
24.
SalzmannGMWalzLSchoettlePBImhoffAB. Arthroscopic anatomical reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint. Acta Orthop Belg. 2008;74(3):397-400.
25.
SchlegelTFBurksRTMarcusRLDunnHK. A prospective evaluation of untreated acute grade III acromioclavicular separations. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(6):699-703.
26.
ShinSJYunYHYooJD. Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular dislocation using 2 suture anchors and coracoacromial ligament transfer. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(2):346-351.
TauberMGordonKKollerHFoxMReschH. Semitendinosus tendon graft versus a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction in chronic cases: a prospective comparative study. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(1):181-190.
29.
TomlinsonDPAltchekDWDavilaJCordascoFA. A modified technique of arthroscopically assisted AC joint reconstruction and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(3):639-645.
30.
TossyJDMeadNCSigmondHM. Acromioclavicular separations: useful and practical classification for treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1963;28:111-119.
31.
WalzLSalzmannGMFabbroTEichhornSImhoffAB. The anatomic reconstruction of acromioclavicular joint dislocations using 2 TightRope devices: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(12):2398-2406.
32.
WellmannMZantopTPetersenW. Minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament augmentation with a flip button/polydioxanone repair for treatment of total acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(10):1132.e1-5.
33.
WellmannMZantopTWeimannARaschkeMJPetersenW. Biomechanical evaluation of minimally invasive repairs for complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(6):955-961.
34.
ZancaP. Shoulder pain: involvement of the acromioclavicular joint: analysis of 1,000 cases. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1971;112(3):493-506.
