Background: Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions involve drilling 2 tibial tunnels separated by a narrow 2-mm bone bridge. The sequence of reaming and drilling the tibial tunnels for double-bundle ACL reconstructions has not been defined.
Hypothesis: Fixing a graft in the posterolateral ACL tibial tunnel before reaming the anteromedial tibial tunnel will reduce the number of complications, as compared with drilling both the anteromedial and posterolateral tunnels before graft fixation, when performing double-bundle ACL reconstructions.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: Twelve porcine tibias were divided into 2 groups of 6 specimens. Fresh bovine extensor tendons grafts were fixed in 7-mm tunnels reamed using an inside-out method. Grafts were fixed in a retrograde fashion with 7-mm bioabsorbable retrograde screws. The tibias in group 1 were reconstructed by reaming and reconstructing the posterolateral tunnel before reaming and securing the graft for the anteromedial tunnel (ie, 1:1 method), whereas those in the second group were reconstructed by reaming both tunnels before graft fixation in either (ie, the 2:2 method). The specimens were biomechanically tested with cyclic and load-to-failure parameters.
Results: Cyclic testing revealed no significant difference between the 2 methods in displacement or stiffness. In load-to-failure testing, the 1:1 group withstood significantly higher initial failure loads and ultimate loads. Pullout displacement was significantly higher for the 1:1 group. Whereas no tibias in the 1:1 group sustained fractures, 4 from the 2:2 group demonstrated a bone bridge fracture.
Conclusion: Soft tissue ACL grafts fixed in the tibia with the 1:1 method withstood significantly higher initial and ultimate failure loads and were stiffer than the grafts fixed with the 2:2 method. Tibias fixed with the 1:1 method were also less susceptible to bone bridge fracture.
Clinical Relevance: The potential for a lower complication rate and greater pullout strength seen with the 1:1 method may prove useful to surgeons performing anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstructions, in addition to other procedures involving reconstructing 2 closely positioned tunnels, including anatomic posterolateral corner and medial collateral reconstructions.
Buelow JU, Siebold R., Ellermann A.A prospective evaluation of tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings: extracortical versus anatomical fixation . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2002 ;10:80-85.
7.
Chang HC, Nyland J., Nawab A., Burden R., Caborn DNBiomechanical comparison of the bioabsorbable RetroScrew system, BioScrew XtraLok with stress equalization tensioner, and 35-mm Delta Screws for tibialis anterior graft-tibial tunnel fixation in porcine tibiae. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1057-1064.
8.
Charlick DA , Caborn DNTechnical note: alternative soft-tissue graft preparation technique for cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2000 ;16:e20.
9.
Cochran GVB.Biomechanics of orthopedic materials. In: A Primer of Orthopedic Biomechanics. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1982:143-216.
10.
Cochran GVB.Biomechanics of orthopedic materials. In: A Primer of Orthopedic Biomechanics. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1982:71-142.
11.
Colombet P. , Robinson J., Jambou S., Allard M., Bousquet V., de Lavigne C.Two-bundle, four-tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc . 2006;14:629-636.
12.
Donahue TL, Gregersen C., Hull ML, Howell SMComparison of viscoelastic, structural, and material properties of double-looped anterior cruciate ligament grafts made from bovine digital extensor and human hamstring tendons. J Biomech Eng. 2001;123: 162-169.
13.
Fauno P., Kaalund S.Tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is influenced by the type of graft fixation used: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1337-1341.
14.
Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML, et al. Prospective trial of a treatment algorithm for the management of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:335-346.
15.
Frankel VH, Burstein AHThe biomechanics of refracture of bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1968;60:221-225.
16.
Freedman KB , D’Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A., Bach BR Jr.Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:2-11.
17.
Fuss FKAnatomy and function of the cruciate ligaments of the domestic pig (Sus scrofa domestica): a comparison with human cruciates. J Anat. 1991;178:11-20.
18.
Gabriel MT, Wong EK, Woo SL, Yagi M., Debski REDistribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(1):85-89.
19.
Giffin JR, Vogrin TM, Zantop T., Woo SL, Harner CDEffects of increasing tibial slope on the biomechanics of the knee . Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:376-382.
Gozna ERBiomechanics of long bone injuries. In: Gozna ER, Harrington IJ, Evans DC, eds, Biomechanics of Musculoskeletal Injury. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1982:1-22.
22.
Haut RC, Powlison ACThe effects of test environment and cyclic stretching on the failure properties of human patellar tendons. J Orthop Res. 1990 ;8(4):532-540.
23.
Haynes WCBiomechanics of fracture treatment. In: Heppenstall RB, ed, Fracture Treatment and Healing. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co, 1980:124-163.
24.
Honl M., Carrero V., Hille E., Schneider E., Morlock MMBone-patellar tendon-bone grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vitro comparison of mechanical behavior under failure tensile loading and cyclic submaximal tensile loading. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:549-557.
25.
Johnson BA, Fallat LMThe effect of screw holes on bone strength. J Foot Ankle Surg . 1997;36:446-451.
26.
Johnson DL, Fu FHAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: why do failures occur? Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:391-406.
27.
Kondo E., Yasuda K., Ichiyama H., Azuma C., Tohyama H.Radiologic evaluation of femoral and tibial tunnels created with the transtibial tunnel technique for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction . Arthroscopy. 2007 ;23:869-876.
28.
Kousa P., Jarvinen TL, Vihavainen M., Kannus P., Jarvinen M.The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part II: tibial site. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:182-188.
29.
Lie DT, Bull AM, Amis AAPersistence of the mini pivot shift after anatomically placed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;457:203-209.
Magen HE, Howell SM, Hull MLStructural properties of six tibial fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue grafts. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:35-43.
32.
Markolf KL, Gorek JF, Kabo JM, Shapiro MSDirect measurement of resultant forces in the anterior cruciate ligament: an in vitro study performed with a new experimental technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:557-567.
33.
Muller ME, Allgower M., Schneider R., et al. Manual of Internal Fixation. New York, NY : Springer-Verlag; 1979:148-149.
34.
Müller W.The Knee: Form, Function, and Ligament Reconstruction . New York, NY: Springer-Verlag ; 1983:314.
35.
Muneta T., Sekiya I., Yagishita K., Ogiushi T., Yamamoto H., Shinomiya K.Two-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using semitendinosus tendon with endobuttons: operative technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy. 1999;15:618-624.
36.
Nagarkatti DG, McKeon BP, Donahue BS, Fulkerson JPMechanical evaluation of a soft tissue interference screw in free tendon anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:67-71.
37.
Nevill AM, Holder RL, Stewart ADModeling elite male athletes’ peripheral bone mass, assessed using regional dual x-ray absorptiometry. Bone. 2003;32:62-68.
38.
Nordstrom P. , Lorentzon R.Site-specific bone mass differences of the lower extremities in 17-year-old ice hockey players. Calcif Tissue Int. 1996;59:443-448.
39.
Petersen W. , Zantop T.Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament with regard to its two bundles. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:35-47.
40.
Prevrhal S. , Fuerst T., Fan B., et al. Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia depends on both cortical density and thickness. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12:28-34.
41.
Radford WJ, Amis AABiomechanics of a double prosthetic ligament in the anterior cruciate deficient knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 ;72:1038-1043.
42.
Sakane M., Fox RJ, Woo SL, Livesay GA, Li G., Fu FHIn situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads. J Orthop Res. 1997 ;15:285-293.
43.
Seil R., Rupp S., Krauss PW, Benz A., Kohn DMComparison of initial fixation strength between biodegradable and metallic interference screws and a press-fit fixation technique in a porcine model . Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:815-819.
44.
Siebold R.Observations on bone tunnel enlargement after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2007 ;23:291-298.
45.
Siebold R., Dehler C., Ellert T.Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:137-145.
46.
Siebold R., Ellert T., Metz S., Metz J.Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for double-bundle bone tunnel placement-a cadaver study. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:585-592.
47.
Siebold R., Ellert T., Metz S., Metz J.Tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry, arthroscopic landmarks, and orientation model for bone tunnel placement. Arthroscopy. 2008 ;24:154-161.
48.
Siebold R., Thierjung H., Cafaltzis K., Hoeschlel E., Tao J., Ellert T.Tibial bone bridge and bone block fixation in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction without hardware: a technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:386-392.
Takahashi M. , Doi M., Abe M., Suzuki D., Nagano A.Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 2006 ;34:787-792.
51.
Tetsumura S. , Fujita A., Nakajima M., Abe M.Biomechanical comparison of different fixation methods on the tibial side in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in porcine tibial bone. J Orthop Sci. 2006;11:278-282.
52.
Vogler HWBasic bioengineering concepts: concepts in bone performance, failure, and osteosynthesis. Clin Podiatry. 1985;2:161-189.
53.
Walsh MP, Wijdicks CA, Parker JB, Hapa O., LaPrade RFA comparison between a retrograde interference screw, suture button, and combined fixation on the tibial side in an all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in a porcine model. Am J Sports Med . 2009;37:160-167.
Yagi M., Wong EK, Kanamori A., Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SLBiomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction . Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:660-666.
56.
Yamanaka M. , Yasuda K., Tohyama H., Nakano H., Wada T.The effect of cyclic displacement on the biomechanical characteristics of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 1999; 27:772-777.
57.
Yasuda K., Kondo E., Ichiyama H., et al. Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy. 2004;20: 1015-1025.
58.
Zantop T., Herbort M., Raschke MJ, Fu FH, Petersen W.The role of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior tibial translation and internal rotation. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:223-227.
59.
Zantop T., Petersen W., Sekiya JK, Musahl V., Fu FHAnterior cruciate ligament anatomy and function relating to anatomical reconstruction . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 ;14:982-992.
60.
Zantop T., Wellmann M., Fu FH, Petersen W.Tunnel positioning of anteromedial and posterolateral bundles in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anatomic and radiographic findings . Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:65-72.
