AntmanEM, LauJ, KupelnickB, MostellerF, ChalmersTC.A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and recommendation of clinical experts: treatments for myocardial infarctions. JAMA. 1992;268:240–248.
2.
DickersinK, SchererR, LefebvreC.Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994;309;1286–1291.
3.
FeinsteinAR, HorwitzRL.Problems in the “evidence” of “evidencedbased medicine.”Am J Med. 1997;103:529–535.
4.
KhanKS, KunzR, KleiknenJ, AntesG.Five steps to conducting a systematic review. J Royal Soc Med. 2003;96:118–121.
5.
McAlisterFA, ClarkHD, van WalravenC, et al. The medical review article revisited: has the science improved?Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:947–951.
6.
MulrowCD.Systematic reviews: rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994;309:597–599.
7.
OxmanAD.Systematic reviews: checklist for review articles. BMJ. 1994;309:648–651.
8.
PaiM, McCulloughM, GormanJD, et al. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by step guide. Nat Med J India. 2004;17:86–95.
9.
PetticrewM.Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions. BMJ. 2001;322;98–101.
10.
PetticrewM.Why certain systematic reviews reach uncertain conclusions. BMJ. 2003;326:756–758.
11.
SchrierI.Stretching before exercise: an evidenced based approach. Br J Sports Med. 2000:34:324–325.
12.
SterneJAC, EggerM, SmithGD.Systematic reviews in health care: investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta analysis. BMJ. 2001;323:101–105.
