You are on the new improved site. You can view the old site in view-only mode here until June 27, 2026

Filter Results

Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal

Search this journal

Enter search terms…

Advanced search

/

About

About Sage
About Sage Journals
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Contact Us
Help

Information for

Authors
Editors
Librarians
Researchers
Reviewers
Frequently asked questions

Copyright © 2026 by Sage Publications.京ICP备09090397号-11

The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Impact Factor: 4.5 / 5-Year Impact Factor: 5.5

Journal Homepage Submission guidelines

Restricted access

Research article

First published online 2006-4

Jury Selection

Volume 34, Issue 4

https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506287183

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1.

Schroter

S

, Tite

L

, Hutchings

A

, Black

N.

Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors and by editors. JAMA. 2006;295:314–317.

2.

van Rooyan

S

, Black

N

, Goodlee

F.

Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:625–629.

Browse journal

Current issue OnlineFirst All issues

Similar articles

Open access

Complication and Readmission Assessment of Fibular Intramedullary Nailing in the Context of Tibial Open Reduction Internal Fixation

Open access

Microvasculature of the First Tarsometatarsal Joint Following Open vs MIS Lapidus Bunionectomy: A Cadaveric Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis

Open access

PROMs Behavior and Survivorship of Total Ankle Replacement Revisions: A Comprehensive Cohort Study

Open access

Ankle-Foot-Orthosis Use Modifies Hindfoot Morphology in Individuals with Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease