Biomechanical Evaluation of Meniscal Repair Systems

Abstract

Background: The biomechanical characteristics of the Meniscal Viper Repair System have not been previously studied.

Hypothesis: Comparable meniscal lesion fixation standards will exist among the Meniscal Viper Repair System, the vertical FasT-Fix device, and vertical mattress sutures.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Porcine menisci (3 groups of 7 menisci each) were repaired using different devices. A servohydraulic device cycled each construct between 5 N and 50 N for 500 cycles before load to failure (5 mm/min). Group differences were evaluated with 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc tests.

Results: During cyclic testing, the vertical mattress suture group (2.3 ± 0.2 mm) showed less mean displacement than did the vertical FasT-Fix or the Viper system groups (3.9 ± 0.7 mm and 3.9 ± 0.5 mm, respectively); the vertical mattress suture group (21.8 ± 2 N/mm) also displayed superior mean stiffness to the vertical FasT-Fix or the Viper system groups (13.2 ± 2 N/mm and 13.1 ± 1.8 N/mm, respectively). During load-to-failure testing, the vertical FasT-Fix group (145.9 ± 9 N) withstood greater mean loads than did the Viper system group (111.2 ± 30 N), but it did not differ significantly from loads withstood by the vertical mattress suture group (133.4 ± 10 N). The Viper system and vertical FasT-Fix groups (14.6 ± 2 N/mm and 12.1 ± 1 N/mm, respectively) displayed superior mean stiffness to the vertical mattress suture group (9.8 ± 0.5 N/mm) during load-to-failure testing.

Clinical Relevance: Standard vertical mattress sutures provided superior fixation during cyclic loading compared with the 2 all-inside methods of suture fixation, suggesting a potential for better meniscal lesion healing with vertical mattress sutures when confronted with the stresses associated with early, progressive rehabilitation activities. Stronger sutures and less meniscal segment purchase in tears located 3 to 4 mm from the periphery may contribute to the failure of the Viper repair system.

Keywords

meniscal fixation techniques biodegradable implants biomechanics bucket-handle tear

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnoczky SP

Lavagnino M

. Tensile fixation strengths of absorbable meniscal repair devices as a function of hydrolysis time: an in vitro experimental study. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:118-123.

Aspden RM

Yarker YE

Hukins DW

. Collagen orientations in the meniscus of the knee joint. J Anat. 1985;140:371-380.

Baratz ME

Fu FH

Mengato R

. Meniscal tears: the effect of meniscectomy and of repair on intraarticular contact areas and stress in the human knee. A preliminary report. Am J Sports Med. 1986;14:270-275.

Barber FA

Herbert MA

. Meniscal repair devices. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:613-618.

Barber FA

Herbert MA

Richards DP

. Load to failure testing of new meniscal repair devices. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:45-50.

Becker R

Starke C

Heymann M

Nebelung W

. Biomechanical properties under cyclic loading of seven meniscus repair techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;400:236-245.

Borden P

Nyland J

Caborn DN

. Biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system with vertical mattress sutures and meniscus arrows. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:374-378.

Cicuttini FM

Forbes A

Yuanyuan W

. Rate of knee cartilage loss after partial meniscectomy. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:1954-1956.

Dervin GF

Downing KJ

Keene GC

. Failure strengths of suture versus biodegradable arrow for meniscal repair: an in vitro study. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:296-300.

10.

Durselen L

Hebisch A

Claes LE

Bauer G

. Gapping phenomenon of longitudinal meniscus tears. Clin Biomech. 2003;18:505-510.

11.

Durselen L

Schneider J

Galler M

Claes LE

Bauer G

. Cyclic joint loading can affect the initial stability of meniscal fixation implants. Clin Biomech. 2003;18:44-49.

12.

Ihn JC

Kim SJ

Park IH

. In vitro study of contact area and pressure distribution in the human knee after partial and total meniscectomy. Int Orthop. 1993;17:214-218.

13.

Kirsch L

Kohn D

Glowik A

. Forces in medial and lateral meniscus sutures during knee extension: an in vitro study. J Biomech. 1998;31:104.

14.

Kohn D

Siebert W

. Meniscus suture techniques: a comparative biomechanical cadaver study. Arthroscopy. 1989;5:324-327.

15.

Koukoubis TD

Glisson RR

Feagin JA

et al

. Meniscal fixation with an absorbable staple: an experimental study in dogs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997;5:22-30.

16.

McDermott ID

Richards SW

Hallam P

Tavares S

Lavelle JR

Amis AA

. A biomechanical study of four different meniscal repair systems, comparing pull-out strengths and gapping under cyclic loading. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11:23-29.

17.

Miller MD

Kline AJ

Gonzales J

. Pitfalls associated with FasT-Fix meniscal repair. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:939-943.

18.

Papageorgiou CD

Gil JE

Kanamori A

. The biomechanical interdependence between the anterior cruciate ligament replacement graft and the medial meniscus. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:226-231.

19.

Post WR

Akers SR

Kish V

. Load to failure of common meniscal repair techniques: effects of suture technique and suture material. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:731-736.

20.

Seil R

Rupp S

Jurecka C

. Effect of various suture strength factors on behavior of meniscus sutures in cyclic loading conditions. Unfallchirurg. 2001;104:392-398.

21.

Seil R

Rupp S

Kohn DM

. Cyclic testing of meniscal sutures. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:505-510.

22.

Song EK

Lee KB

. Biomechanical test comparing the load to failure of the biodegradable meniscus arrow versus meniscal suture. Arthroscopy. 1999;15:726-732.

23.

Sweigart MA

Aufderheide AC

Athansiou KA

. Fibrochondrocytes and their use in tissue engineering of the meniscus. In:

Ashammakhi N

Ferretti P

, eds. Topics in Tissue Engineering. Linnanmaa, Finland: University of Oulu; 2003:1-19.

24.

Sweigart MA

Zhu CF

Burt DM

et al

. Intraspecies and interspecies comparison of the compressive properties of the medial meniscus. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004;32:1569-1579.

25.

Zantop T

Eggers AK

Musahl V

Weimann A

Petersen W

. Cyclic testing of flexible all-inside meniscus suture anchors; biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:388-394.

26.

Zantop T

Eggers AK

Weimann A

. Initial fixation strength of flexible all-inside meniscus suture anchors in comparison to conventional suture technique and rigid anchors: biomechanical evaluation of new meniscus refixation systems. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:863-869.