Abstract
Background: Arthroscopic examination has shown that the regenerative cartilage that appears after arthroscopic drilling for thetreatment of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome does not always cover the cartilage defect sufficiently.
Hypothesis: The remaining degenerative cartilage at the lesions may obstruct the healing of the articular cartilage.
Study Design: Prospective cohort study.
Methods: Thirty-nine patients underwent arthroscopic drilling that kept the remaining cartilage at the lesion (group A), and 30patients underwent arthroscopic drilling that removed the remaining cartilage at the lesion (group B). At 1 year after theoperation, we performed ankle arthroscopy to evaluate the cartilage condition.
Results: The arthroscopic findings revealed that in group A, 11 cases (28.2%) were improved, 12 cases (30.8%) wereunchanged, and 16 cases (41.0%) had deteriorated; in group B, 27 cases (93.1%) were improved and 2 cases were unchanged.There were significant differences between group A and group B in the rate of cases whose cartilage condition was seen toimprove under arthroscopic examination (P< 0.0001).
Conclusions: The study shows that in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome, the removing of the remainingdegenerative cartilage may be of some benefit in the treatment of these lesions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.