Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare joint capsular healing after two delivery patterns of monopolar radiofrequency energy: 1) uniform treatment of the joint capsule (paintbrush pattern) and 2) multiple single linear passes (grid pattern). First, an in vitro study was performed to compare the percent shrinkage of these two treatment patterns using the femoropatellar joints (stifles) of six sheep. Monopolar radiofrequency energy (settings, 70°C/15W) was applied to the lateral joint capsule; the treated area was approximately 10 10 mm. There was no significant difference in shrinkage between the grid (27% 8.7%) and paintbrush (29% 7.9%) patterns. In the in vivo study, stifles of 24 sheep were randomly assigned to the paintbrush or the grid pattern groups and treatment was performed arthroscopically. Sheep were sacrificed immediately after surgery, or at 2, 6, or 12 weeks after surgery. At 6 weeks after surgery, confocal microscopy demonstrated that treated areas had almost completely repaired in the grid group; some nonviable areas were still present in the paintbrush group. Mechanical testing at 6 weeks indicated that joint capsule in the grid group had better mechanical properties than capsule in the paintbrush group. This study revealed that radiofrequency treatment of joint capsule in a grid pattern allowed faster healing than tissue treated in a paintbrush pattern.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.