In the parish of Belm, Northwest Germany, population trebled between 1650 and 1830, but the number of peasant holdings remained stable. A new class of people without real property came into existence. Protoindustrialization in the form of linen production supplemented incomes from agriculture. This article outlines social differentials in demographic behavior and household structure. It looks at social mobility and the selection of mates. Furthermore, it explores the economic and non-economic ties that bound together propertied and propertyless families. Finally, it asks how important kinship was for propertied peasants and for landless people. It suggests that kin relationships across classes or within class may have been a factor relevant in the formation of classes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BourdieuPierre. 1976. Marriage Strategies as Strategies of Social Reproduction. Pp. 117–144 in Family and Society, edited by ForsterRobertRanumOrest. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
BraunRudolf. 1990. Industrialisation and Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
CollompAlain. 1983. La maison du père: Famille et village en Haute-Provence aux 17e et 18e siècles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
4.
CollompAlain. 1988. From Stem Family to Nuclear Family: Changes in the Coresident Domestic Group in Haute Provence Between the End of the 18th and the Middle of the 19th centuries.Continuity and Change3:65–81.
5.
EhmerJosef. 1991. Heiratsverhalten, Sozialstruktur, ökonomischer Wandel: England und Mitteleuropa in der Formationsperiode des Kapitalismus. Göttingen: Vandenboeck.
6.
Fauve-ChamouxAntoinette. 1981. Population et famille dans les Hautes Pyrénées aux 18e–20e siècles: L'exemple d'Esparros. Pp. 43–63 in Les Pyrénées et les Carpates, 16e – 20e siècles. Recherches franco - polonaises comparées, edited by BobinskaCelinaGoyJoseph. Warszawa: Panstwowe wydawnictwo naukowe.
7.
FlinnMichael W.1981. The European Demographic System 1500–1820. Brighton: Harvester Press.
8.
HenryLouisHoudailleJacques. 1978–1979. Célibat et âge au mariage aux 18e et 19e siècles en France. Part 1: Population33:43–84; part 2: Population 34:403–442.
9.
HinrichsErnstKrämerRosemarieReindersChristoph. 1988. Die Wirtschaft des Landes Oldenburg in vorindustrieller Zeit: Eine regionalgeschichtliche Dokumentation für die Zeit von 1700 bis 1850. Oldenburg: Holzberg.
10.
HobsbawmEric J.1954. The General Crisis of the European Economy in the 17th Century. Part 1: Past and Present5:33–53; part 2: Past and Present 6:44–65.
11.
HoudailleJacques. 1984. La mortalité des enfants dans la France rurale de 1690 à 1779.Population39:37–106.
12.
ImhofArthur E.1990. Life Expectancies in Germany from the 17th to the 19th Century. Weinheim: VCH Acta humaniora.
13.
KamphoefnerWalter D.1987. The Westfalians: From Germany to Missouri. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
KnodelJohn E.1988. Demographic Behavior in the Past. A Study of Fourteen German Village Populations in the 18th and 19th Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
KriedtePeterMedickHansSchlumbohmJürgen. 1981. Industrialization before Industrialization: Rural Industry in the Genesis of Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
MayhewAlan. 1973. Rural Settlement and Farming in Germany. London: Batsford.
17.
MendelsFranklin F.1972. Proto-industrialization: The First Phase of the Industrialization Process.Journal of Economic History32:241–261.
18.
MintzSidney W.1973/ 1974a. A Note on the Definition of Peasantries.The Journal of Peasant Studies1: 92–106.
19.
MintzSidney W.1973/1974b. The Rural Proletariat and the Problem of Rural Proletarian Consciousness.The Journal of Peasant Studies1:291–325.
20.
MooserJosef. 1984. Ländliche Klassengesellschaft 1770–1848: Bauern und Unterschichten, Landwirtschaft und Gewerbe im östlichen Westfalen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck.
21.
NordenWilhelm. 1984. Eine Bevölkerung in der Krise: Historisch-demographische Untersuchungen zur Biographie einer norddeutschen Küstenregion, Butjadingen 1600–1850. Hildesheim: Lax.
22.
SabeanDavid. 1976. Aspects of Kinship Behaviour and Property in Rural Western Europe Before 1800. Pp. 96–111 in Family and Inheritance: Rural Society in Western Europe, 1200–1800, edited by GoodyJackThirskJoanThompsonE.P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
SabeanDavid. 1990. Property, Production, and Family in Neckarhausen, 1700–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
SchlumbohmJürgen. 1982. Agrarische Besitzklassen und gewerbliche Produktions-verhältnisse: Großbauern, Kleinbesitzer und Landlose als Leinenproduzenten im Umland von Osnabrück und Bielefeld während des frühen 19. Jahrhunderts. Pp. 315–334 in Mentalitäten und Lebensverhältnisse. Rudolf Vierhaus zum 60. Geburtstag. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck.
25.
SchlumbohmJürgen. 1983. Seasonal Fluctuations and Social Division of Labour: Rural Linen Production in the Osnabrück and Bielefeld Regions and the Urban Woollen Industry in the Niederlausitz, c. 1770 - c. 1850. Pp. 92–123 in Manufacture in Town and Country Before the Factory, edited by BergMaxine et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
SchlumbohmJürgen. 1991. Social Differences in Age at Marriage: Examples from Rural Germany during the 18th and 19th Centuries. Pp. 593–607 in Historiens et populations. Liber amicorum Etienne Hélin. Louvain-la-Neuve: Academia.
27.
SchofieldRoger. 1985. English Marriage Patterns Revisited.Journal of Family History10:2–20.
28.
Stüve[Johann]BertramC[arl]. 1853–1882. Geschichte des Hochstifts Osnabrück, 3 vols. Osnabrück and Jena.
29.
VernierBernard. 1984. Putting Kin and Kinship to Good Use: The Circulation of Goods, Labour, and Names on Karpathos (Greece). Pp. 28–76 in Interest and Emotion: Essays on the Study of Family and Kinship, edited by MedickHansSabeanDavid W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
WeirDavid R.1984. Rather Never than Late: Celibacy and Age at Marriage in English Cohort Fertility, 1541 – 1871.Journal of Family History9:340–354.
31.
WrasmannAdolf. 1919–1921. Das Heuerlingswesen im Fürstentum Osnabrück. Part 1: Mitteilungen des Vereins für Geschichte und Landeskunde von Osnabrück42:53–171; part 2: Mitteilungen des Vereins für Geschichte und Landeskunde von Osnabrück 44:1–154.
32.
WrigleyE.A.SchofieldRoger S.. 1983. English Population History from Family Reconstitution: Summary Results 1600 – 1799., Population Studies37:157–184.
