Reviewed in light of evidence from the commune of Casalecchio, the Hajnal thesis and its subsequent reformulations are shown to be in need of modification. With respect to the “Mediterranean marriage pattern” (postulated by Peter Laslett), the Casalecchio evidence shows a strong patrilocal tradition of postmarital residence but not a concomitant early female age at marriage, a large spousal gap, or a small proportion of people who never marry. Moreover, marriage age remained relatively high during the period of proletarianization and the proletarian segment of the community married at much the same ages as the most traditional sharecropping population. The relationship between the impact of industrialization and marriage age in particular is therefore more complex than has been hypothesized.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlterGeorge. 1988. Family and the Female Life Course: The Women of Verviers, Belgium, 1849–1880. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
2.
AndersonMichael. 1971. Family Structure in Nineteenth Century Lancashire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BarbagliMarzio. 1984. Sotto lo stesso tetto: Mutamenti della famiglia in Italia dal XV al XX secolo. Bologna: II Mulino.
4.
BellettiniAthos. 1965. La Popolazione del Dipartimento di Reno. Bologna: Zanichelli.
5.
GuinnaneTimothy. 1991. “Marriage Substitutes and Non-marriage in Turn-of-the-century Ireland.” Journal of Family History16: 47–64.
6.
HajnalJohn. 1965. “European Marriage Patterns in Perspective.” pp. 101–143 in Population in History, edited by GlassD.V.EversleyD.E.C.. Chicago: Aldine.
7.
HajnalJohn. 1983. “Two Kinds of Preindustrial Household Formation System.” pp. 65–104 in Family Forms in Historic Europe, edited by WallRichardRobinJeanLaslettPeter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
HoganDennis P.KertzerDavid I.. 1985. “Longitudinal Approaches to Migration in Social History.” Historical Methods18: 20–30.
9.
HoganDennis P.KertzerDavid I.. 1986. “The Social Bases of Declining Infant Mortality: Lessons from a Nineteenth-century Italian Community.” European Journal of Population2: 361–386.
10.
KertzerDavid I.1984. Family Life in Central Italy, 1880–1910. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
11.
KertzerDavid I.1989. “The Joint Family Household Revisited: Demographic Constraints and Household Complexity in the European Past.” Journal of Family History14: 1–15.
12.
KertzerDavid I.BrettellCaroline B.. 1987. “Advances in Italian and Iberian Family History.” Journal of Family History12: 87–120.
13.
KertzerDavid I.HoganDennis P.. 1988. “Family Structure, Individual Lives, and Societal Change.” pp. 83–100 in Social Structures and Human Lives, edited by White RileyMatilda. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
KertzerDavid I.HoganDennis P.. 1989. Family, Political Economy, and Demographic Change: The Transformation of Life in Casalecchio, Italy, 1861–1921. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
15.
KnodelJohn. 1986. “Demographic Transitions in German Villages.” pp. 337–389 in The Decline of Fertility in Europe, edited by CoaleAnsley J.WatkinsSusan C.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
16.
KnodelJohn. 1988. Demographic Behavior in the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
LaslettPeter. 1977. Family Life and Illicit Love in Earlier Generations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
LaslettPeter. 1983. “Family and Household as Work Group and Kin Group: Areas of Traditional Europe Compared.” pp. 513–563 in Family Forms in Historic Europe, edited by WallRichardRobinJeanLaslettPeter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
LehningJames R.1988. “The Timing and Prevalence of Women's Marriage in the French Department of the Loire, 1851–1891.” Journal of Family History13: 307–327.
20.
LevineDavid. 1977. Family Formation in an Age of Nascent Capitalism. New York: Academic.
21.
MasulliIgnazio. 1980. Crisi e trasformazione: Strutture economiche, rapporti sociali e lotte politiche nel bolognese (1880–1914). Bologna: Istituto per la Storia di Bologna.
22.
MedickHans. 1981. “The Structure and Function of Population Development Under the Proto-industrial System.” pp. 74–93 in Industrialization Before Industrialization, edited by KreidtePeterMedickHansSchlumbohmJürgen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MendelsFranklin F.1972. “Proto-industrialization: The First Phase of the Process of Industrialization.” Journal of Economic History32: 241–261.
25.
MorettiPietro. 1989. “‘Un uomo per famiglio’. Servi, contadini e famiglie nella diocesi di Reggio Emilia nel settecento.” Quaderni Storici71: 405–442.
26.
NataleM.1974. “La composition de la population.” pp. 81–112 in La population de l'Italie. Rome: Comité International de Coordination des Recherches Nationales en Démographie.
27.
RettaroliRosella. 1986. Modelli di nuzialità nell'Italia rurale nel XIX secolo. Tesi di dot-torato di ricerca, Dipartimento di Scienze Statistiche, University of Bologna.
28.
SereniEmilio. 1968. Il capitalismo nelle campagne (1860–1900). Torino: Einaudi.
29.
SpagnoliPaul G.1983. “Industrialization, Proletarianization, and Marriage: A Reconsideration.” Journal of Family History8: 230–247.
30.
TittarelliLuigi: In press. “Choosing a Spouse in Central Italy: Nineteenth-century Sharecropping Society.” In The Family in Italy from Antiquity to the Present, edited by KertzerDavid I.SallerRichard. New Haven: Yale University Press.
31.
WallRichard. 1983. “The Composition of Households in a Population of Six Men to Ten Women: Southeast Bruges in 1814. Pp. 421–474 in Family Forms in Historic Europe, edited by WallRichardRobinJeanLaslettPeter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
WrigleyE. AnthonySchofieldRoger S.. 1981. The Population History of England 1541–1871. London: Edward Arnold.
