Data from the National Panel Study are used to investigate occupational choices and migration status among a sample of U.S. white farm boys in the late 1800s. Originally sampled when 5 to 14 years old in 1880, these boys are traced to the 1900 census when they were young adults. In general, the decision to leave farming was related to the urban-industrial “pull” of the surrounding environment and the degree of farm mechanization of the community. While migratory behavior correlates positively with occupational change, the major social correlates are somewhat different. Variations in migration are not strongly related to the urban-industrial and agricultural environments. Rather, variables measuring the probability of farm inheritance emerge as stronger predictors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonB.A.1980. Internal Migration During Modernization in Late 19th Century Russia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2.
BarronH.S.1984. Those Who Stayed Behind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BenderT.1982. Community and Social Change in American Cities. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
4.
BerknerL.K.1972. “The Stem Family and the Developmental Cycle of the Peasant Household.” American Historical Review77:398–419.
5.
BerryB.J.L.1973. The Human Consequences of Urbanism. New York: St. Martins Press.
6.
BishopC.E.1967. “The Urbanization of Rural America: Implications for Agricultural Economics.” American Journal of Agriculture49:999–1008.
7.
BlauP.DuncanO.D.. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: The Free Press.
8.
DarrochG.A.1981. “Migrants in the Nineteenth Century: Fugitives or Families in Motion?” Journal of Family History2:257–277.
9.
DuncanO.D.1966. “Occupational Trends and Patterns of Net Mobility in the U.S.” Demography3:1–18.
10.
EasterlinR.AlterG.ConfranG.. 1978. Farms and Families in Old and New Areas: The Northern States in 1860. pp. 39–53 in Family and Population in Nineteenth Century America, edited by HarevenT.K.VinovskisM.A., Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11.
EasterlinR.AlterG.ConfranG.. 1976. “Factors in the Decline of Family Fertility in the U.S.: Some Preliminary Research Results.” Journal of American History63:600–614.
12.
EldridgeH.ThomasD.. 1964. Population Redistribution and Economic Growth: U.S. 1870–1950. Part III. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society.
13.
EngelsF.A.1974. The Condition of the Working Class in England. St. Albans: Panther. Reprint.
14.
FeathermanD.L.HauserR.M.. 1978. Opportunity and Change. New York: Academic Press.
15.
FligsteinN.1981. Going North. New York: Academic Press.
16.
FloreyF.A.1986. “Movement Out of Agricultural Settings: U.S. 1880–1900.” Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle.
17.
ForsterC.TuckerG.S.L.. 1972. Economic Opportunity and White American Fertility Ratios. New Haven: Yale University Press.
18.
GoldscheiderC.1984. Rural Migration in Developing Nations. Boulder. Westview Press.
19.
GoodyJ.1976. Family and Inheritance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GordonR.A.1968. “Issues in Multiple Regression.” American Journal of Sociology73:592–617.
21.
GuestA.1987. “Notes From the National Panel Study: Linkage and Migration in the Late 19th Century.” Historical Methods20:63–77.
22.
GuestA.LandaleN.S.MccannJ.C.. 1986. “Intergenerational Occupational Mobility in the Late 19th Century United States.” Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Population Association of America, San Francisco.
23.
HauserP.M.SchnoreL.R.. 1967. The Study of Urbanization. New York: John Wiley.
24.
HenrettaJ.A.1978. “Families and Farms: Mentalite in Pre-industrial America.” The William and Mary Quarterly35:4–32.
25.
HiggsR.1971. The Transformation of the American Economy: 1865–1914. New York: John Wiley.
26.
HoganD.P.KertzerD.I.. 1985. “Migration Patterns During Italian Urbanization.” Demography22:309–327.
27.
Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.1980. Guide to Resources and Services: 1979–1980. Ann Arbor Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
28.
KelleyA.WilliamsonJ.. 1984. “Population Growth, Industrial Revolution and the Urban Transition.” Population and Development Review10:419–441.
29.
KettJ.R.1973. Adolescence and Youth in Nineteenth Century America. pp. 95–110 in Family History: Interdisciplinary Research, edited by RabbT. K.RotbergR.I.. New York: Harper and Torch Books.
30.
KeyfitzN.1964. Population Problems. pp. 67–82 in French-Canadian Society, edited by RiouxM.MartingI.. Toronto: McIelland and Stewart Ltd.
31.
KuznetsS.ThomasD.S.. 1958. Internal Migration and Economic Growth. pp. 196–211 in Selected Studies of Migration Since WW II, edited by KuznetsS.ThomasD.S.. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society.
32.
LeeE.S.1966. “A Theory of Migration.” Demography3:47–57.
33.
MatrasJ.1977. Introduction to Population: A Sociological Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
34.
MochL.P.1983. Paths to the City. London: Sage.
35.
ModellJ.FurstenbergF.F.Jr.HershbergT.. 1981. Social Change and Transitions To Adulthood in Historical Perspective. pp. 311–341 in Philadelphia: Working Space, Family, and Group Experience in the Nineteenth Century, edited by HershbergT.. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
ParkersonD.H.1982. “How Mobile Were 19th Century Americans?” Historical Methods15:99–109
37.
RavensteinE.J.1885. “The Laws of Migration.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society48:167–227.
38.
RavensteinE.J.1889. “The Laws of Migration.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society52:214–301.
39.
RedfordA.Labor Migration In England, 1800–1850. Manchester Manchester University Press.
40.
SalamonS.GegenbacherK.M.PenasD.J.. 1986. “Family Factors Affecting the Intergenerational Succession To Farming.” Human Organization45:24–33.
41.
TaeuberK.E.ChizzesL.Jr.HaenszelW.. 1968. Migtration in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
42.
TaeuberK.E.TaeuberA.F.. 1964. “White Migration and Socio-economic Differentials Between Cities and Suburbs.” American Sociological Review29:718–729.
43.
ThernstromS.KnightsP.. 1970. “Men in Motion: Some Data and Speculations About Urban Population Mobility in 19th Century America.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History1:7–35.
44.
TillyC.1978. Migration in Modern European History. pp. 142–157 in Human Migration: Patterns and Policies, edited by McneilW.AdamsR.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
45.
TillyC.BrownH.C.. 1967. “On Uprooting, Kinship and the Auspices of Migration.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology7:139–164.
46.
TolnayS.E.GrahamS.N.GuestA.M.. 1982. “Own Child Estimates of U.S. White Fertility 1886–1899.” Historical Methods15:127–138.
47.
TurnerF.J.1971. “The Frontier in American History.” American Historical Society Pamphlet no. 101:20–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.1949. Historical Statistics of the United States, 1789–1945. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
49.
VedderR.K.GallawayL.E.. 1975. Migration in the Old Northwest. pp. 162–183 in Nineteenth Century Economic History, edited by KlingmanD.VedderR.. Athens: Ohio University Press.
