Using samples of households from the 1851 and 1881 censuses of Arnold, Nottinghamshire, a proto-industrial village specializing in framework knitting, the research reported in this article examines the changes in the economic activities of household members as the domestic industry was being superseded by the factory system. The data show the continuing importance of the family economy to the economic viability of households and the increasing significance of the economic contribution of wives. These economic contributions were made possible by an increased demand for women to do homework as seamers of hosiery, which occurred as a consequence of changes in the methods of manufacturing knitted garments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderS.1983. Reprinted. Women's Work in Nineteenth Century London. London: Journeyman Press.
2.
AndersonM.1971. Family Structure in Nineteenth Century Lancashire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Arnold British School. 1883. School Log.
4.
BarrettM.McintoshM.. 1980. “The Family Wage: Some Problems for Socialists and Feminists.” Capital and Class11:51–72.
5.
BenensonH.1984. “Victorian Sexual Ideology and Marx's Theory of the Working Class.” International Labor and Working Class History25:1–23.
6.
Daybrook School, Arnold Nottinghamshire.1883. School Attendance Log.
7.
DupreeM.1985. Women's Work, Family Employment Patterns and the Potteries. Paper given at the Social Science History Association Meetings, Chicago, Illinois.
8.
FelkinW.1967. Reprinted. History of the Machine-Wrought Hosiery and Lace Manufactures. Newton Abbott: David and Charles.
9.
GullicksonG.L.1982. “Protoindustrialization, Demographic Behavior and the Sexual Division of Labor in Auffay, France, 1750–1850.” Peasant Studies9:106–118.
10.
HainesM.R.1981. Fertility, Nuptiality, and Occupation: A Study of Coal Mining Population and Regions in England and Wales in the Mid-Nineteenth Century. pp. 101–136 in Industrialization and Urbanization, edited by RabbTheodore R.RothbergRobert. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11.
HobsbawmE.1984. Man and Woman: Images on the Left. pp. 83–102 in Worlds of Labor, by HobsbawmE.J.. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
12.
HuntE.H.1981. British Labour History 1815–1914. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
13.
JohnA.1980. By the Sweat of their Brow. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
14.
KelleyF.R.1881. Directory of Nottinghamshire. Arnold.
15.
KingR.W.RussellJ.. 1913. A History of Arnold. Nottingham: Henry B. Saxon.
16.
LandH.1980. “The Family Wage.” Feminist Review4:55–77.
17.
LehningJ.R.1980. The Peasants of Marlhes: Economic Development and Family Organization in Nineteenth Century France. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
18.
LevineD.1977. Family Formation in an Age of Nascent Capitalism. New York: Academic Press.
19.
LevineD.1985. “Industrialization and the Proletarian Family in England.” Past and Present107:168–203.
20.
LevineS.1984. Labor's True Woman: Carpet Weavers, Industrialization and Labor Reform in the Gilded Age. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
21.
LewisJ.1985. Women in England, 1870–1950. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
22.
LynchK.A.1986. “Marriage Age among French Factory Workers: An Alsatian Example.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History16:405–429.
23.
MedickH.1981. The Proto-Industrial Family Economy. pp. 38–64 in Industrialization before Industrialization, edited by KriedtePeterMedickHansSchlumbohnJurgen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
MendelsF.F.1972. “Proto-industrialization: The First Phase of the Industrialization Process.” Journal of Economic History32:241–261.
25.
OsterudN.G.1986. Gender Divisions and the Organization of Work in the Leicester Hosiery Industry. pp. 45–68 in Unequal Opportunities: Women's Employment in the Nineteenth Century, edited by JohnAngela. London: Basil Blackwell.
26.
Parliamentary Papers. 1845. Vol. XV Report of the Commissioner to Inquire into the Condition of the Framework Knitters.
27.
Parliamentary Papers. 1854–5. Vol. XIV, Select Committee on the Stoppage of Wages in Hosiery Manufacture.
28.
Parliamentary Papers. 1863. Vol. XVIII First Report of the Children's Employment Commission with Minutes of Evidence.
29.
Parliamentary Papers. 1871. Vol. XXXVI Reports of the Commissioner of the Truct Acts.
30.
Parliamentary Papers. 1890. Vol. LXVIII, Return of Rates of Wages in Minor Textile Trades.
31.
RoseS.O.1986. “Gender at Work': Sex, Class and Industrial Capitalism.” History Workshop Issue21:114–131.
32.
RoseS.O.1987. “Gender Segregation in the Transition to the Factory: The English Hosiery Industry 1850–1910.” Feminist Studies13:163–184.
33.
RossE.1982. “Fierce Questions and Taunts: Married Life in Working-Class London, 1870–1914.” Feminist Studies8:575–602.
34.
RubensteinD.1969. School Attendance in London 1870–1904: A Social History. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
35.
SamuelR.1977. “Workshop of the World: Steam Power and Hand Technology in Mid-Victorian Britain.” History Workshop3:6–72.
36.
SharpeP.1986. “Family Structure and Economy: Country Framework Knitters 1840–1930.” Unpublished Manuscript.
37.
TillyC.TillyR.. 1971. “Agenda for European Economic History in the 1970s.” Journal of Economic History31:184–198.
38.
TillyL.A.1985. Family, Gender and Occupation in Industrial France: Past and Present. pp. 193–212 in Gender and the Life Course, edited by RossiAlice S.. New York: Aldine.
39.
TillyL.A.ScottJ.W.. 1976. “Women's Work and the Family in Nineteenth Century Europe.” Comparative Studies in Society and History17:36–64.
40.
TillyL.A.ScottJ.W.. 1978. Women, Work and Family. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
41.
VincentD.1981. Bread, Knowledge and Freedom. New York: Methuen.
42.
WrightT.R.1881. Directory of Nottinghamshire.
43.
WoodsMrs. H.1893. Mrs. Haliburton's Troubles. London: Richard Bentley and Son.
