Despite assumptions to the contrary, marriage practices among Arab Muslims in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Nablus in Palestine varied in relation to the social background of the bride and groom. The significance of the indirect dower (mahr), the prevalence of child and cousin marriage, and the frequency of divorce and remarriage differed according to the role marriage played in the political and economic life of various urban classes. The records of the Islamic court, which include marriage contracts and the partition of estates, reveal this diversity and demonstrate the ways in which a woman's experience of marriage depended on her social background.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Mahkamah sharciyyah, Nablus, the West Bank sijills 4–12. Court records from 1720–1858.
2.
cAbbasI.1979. Hair ad-Din ar-Ramli's Fatawa: A New Light on Life in Palestine in the Eleventh/Seventeenth Century. pp. 1–19 in Die Islamische Welt zwischen Mittelalter und Neuzeit. Festschrift für Hans Robert Roemer. Beirut: Franz Steiner Verlag.
3.
AbirM.1975. Local Leadership and Early Reforms in Palestine, 1800–1834. pp. 284–310 in Studies on Palestine during the Ottoman Period, edited by Ma'OzMoshe. Jerusalem: The Magnes Press.
4.
BrookeN.L.1981. Marriage and Society in the Central Middle Ages. pp. 17–34 in Marriage and Society, Studies in the Social History of Marriage, edited by OuthwaiteR.B.. New York: St. Martin's.
5.
CohenA.1973. Palestine in the 18th Century: Patterns of Government and Administration. Jerusalem: The Magnes Press.
6.
EspositoJ.1982. Women in Muslim Family Law. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
7.
GoodeW.J.1963. World Revolution and Family Patterns. New York: The Free Press.
8.
GoodyJ.1983. The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
HoexterM.1973. “The Role of the Qays and Yaman Factions in Local Political Divisions. Jabal Nablus Compared with the Judean Hills in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century.” Asian and African Studies (Jerusalem)9:249–311.
10.
HopkinsN.IbrahimS.E.. 1985. Arab Society. Social Science Perspectives. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.
11.
Ibn cAbdin. 1300 A.H./1822–1883 al-cUqud al-durriyah. Bulaq.
12.
NimrI.1975. Tarikh Jabal Nablus wa al-Balqa'. Vols. I and II. Nablus: al-Matabic al-tacawuni-yah.
13.
RogersM.E.1862. Domestic Life in Palestine. London: Bell and Daldy.
14.
RushtonP.1986. “Property, Power and Family Networks: The Problem of Disputed Marriage in Early Modern England.” Journal of Family History11(3): 205–219.
15.
ScholchA.1984. The Decline of Local Power in Palestine after 1856, The Case of cAqil Aga. Die Welt des Islams23–24:458–475.
16.
StoneL.1975. The Rise of the Nuclear Family in Early Modern England: The Patriarchal Stage. pp. 13–57 in The Family in History, edited by RosenbergCharles E.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
17.
StoneL.1979. The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500–1800. New York: Harper and Row.
18.
WilliganJ.D.LynchK.A.. 1982. Sources and Methods of Historical Demography. New York: Academic Press.
