Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study supports the theoretical argument that historical experiences of the marital cohorts, and the changes in the social and demographic composition of the cohorts, determine the pace of childbearing among white American women married during 1950–1969. During the period 1965–1969 environmental factors supported a delay in the birth of the first child among working women. This may be the result of socioenvironmental responses to the threshold proportion of working women in the 1965–1969 cohort In the past, compositional changes, such as an increase in the proportion of working women, have resulted from structural changes absorbing women into the labor market. These trends might have brought about attitudinal and environmental changes during these years enabling many women to become more work committed Thus, both structural and environmental changes now support delayed childbearing.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J.E.

1977. “Planning of Births: Difference between Blacks and Whites in the United States.” Phylon 38: 282–296.

Anderson

W.A.

1947. “The Spacing of Births in Families of University Graduates.” American Journal of Sociology 53: 23–33.

Anderson

W.A.

1948. “The Control of Child Spacing in University Graduates.” Rural Sociology 13: 307–314.

Bean

F.D.

1983. “The Baby Boom and Its Explanations.” The Sociological Quarterly 24: 353–365.

Bogue

. 1980. Comparative Birth Interval Analysis. Chicago: Community and Family Study Center.

Bumpass

Westhoff

C.F.

. 1970. The Later Years of Childbearing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bureau of the Census. 1978. Trends in Childspacing: June 1975. In Current Population Reports, Series P-20, no. 315. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Bureau of the Census. 1982. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1982–1983. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Chiang

1968. Introduction to Stochastic Processes in Biostatistics. New York: Wiley.

10.

Christensen

1963. “Timing of First Pregnancy as a Factor in Divorce: A Cross Cultural Analysis.” Eugenics Quarterly 10: 119–130.

11.

Cox

1972. “Regression Models and Life Tables (with discussion).” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 34: 187–220.

12.

Davidson

1970. “Social and Economic Variations in Child Spacing.” Social Biology 17: 107–113.

13.

Easterlin

1973. Relative Economic Status and the American Fertility Swing. pp. 170–223 in Family Economic Behavior Problems and Prospects, edited by Sheldon

. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott.

14.

Elder

1974. Children of the Depression. Chicago: University Press of Chicago.

15.

Freedman

Whelpton

Campbell

. 1959. Family Planning Sterility, and Population Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.

16.

Kalbfleisch

Prentice

. 1980. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. New York: Wiley.

17.

Komarovsky

1960. The Unemployed Man and His Family. New York: Dryden Press.

18.

Leslie

G.R.

Anderson

W.A.

Freedman

. 1955. “Studies in Child Spacing. The Time Interval all Children in Completed Families of Purdue University Graduates.” Social Forces 34: 74–82.

19.

Millman

Hendershot

1980. “Early Fertility and Life Time Fertility.” Family Planning Perspective 12: 139–145.

20.

National Center for Health Statistics. 1978. National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle I: Sample Design, Estimation Procedures, and Variance Estimation. Data Evaluation and Methods Research, Series 2, No. 76. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

21.

Rindfuss

Bumpass

John

C. St.

. 1980. “Education and Fertility: Implications for the Roles Women Occupy.” American Sociological Review 45: 431–447.

22.

Rindfuss

Sweet

. 1977. Postwar Fertility Trends and Differentials in the United States. New York: Academic Press.

23.

Ryder

1965. “The Cohort as a Concept in the Study of Social Change.” American Sociological Review 30: 843–861.

24.

Ryder

1973. “A Critique of the National Fertility Study.” Demography 10: 495–505.

25.

Ryder

1979. “The Future of American Fertility.” Social Problems 26: 359–370.

26.

Ryder

1980. Components of Temporal Variations in American Fertility. pp. 15–54 in Demographic Patterns in Developed Societies, edited by Hiors

R.W.

. London: Taylor and Francis.

27.

Whelpton

1964. “Trends and Differentials in the Spacing of Births.” Demography 1: 83–93.

28.

Whelpton

P.K.

Riser

C.V.

. 1950. Social and Psychological Factors Affecting Fertility. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund.

The Postwar Rise and Decline of American Fertility: The Pace of Transition to Motherhood Among 1950–1969 Marital Cohorts of White Women

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References