Kinship and Social Networks: A Regional Analysis of Sibling Relations in Twentieth-Century Netherlands

Abstract

Given the paucity of information on historical kin relations, this study uses survey data in order to investigate how different family forms influenced the size and composition of social networks and the relationships among elderly siblings born in farming families between 1903 and 1937 in three regions of the Netherlands. In the area with stem families, impartible inheritance, and a custom of neighbor help, social networks are largest and contain the most siblings. Multilevel analyses show that even when controlling for other factors, this particular family form positively affects contact frequency in sibling relationships. Our results not only show the persistence of differential kinship values, but since respondents' networks were linked back to their families of socialization in the early twentieth century, findings also reflect regional disparities in kin relations in the past.

Keywords

kinship social networks sibling relations family forms inheritance practices the Netherlands twentieth century mixed methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Giovanni Levi , “ Family and Kin — A Few Thoughts ,” Journal of Family History 15, no. 4 (1990): 567 ; David I. Kertzer , “ Household History and Sociological Theory ,” Annual Review of Sociology 17 (1991): 155—79 . Barry Reay , “ Kinship and the Neighborhood in Nineteenth-century Rural England: The myth of the Autonomous Nuclear Family ,” Journal of Family History 21, no. 10 (1996): 89 ; David W. Sabean , “ Aspects of Kinship Behaviour and Property in Rural Western Europe Before 1800 ,” in Family and Inheritance. Rural Society in Western Europe, 1200-1800 , ed. Jack Goody, Joan Thirsk and E. P. Thompson , 100 ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1976); John E. Crowley , “ The Importance of Kinship: Testamentary Evidence from South Carolina ,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 16, no. 4 (1986): 559 .

Leonore Davidoff , “ Kinship as a Categorical Concept: A Case Study of Nineteenth Century English Siblings ,” Journal of Social History 39, no. 2 (2005): 411—28 . Lorri Glover , All Our Relations. Blood Ties and Emotional Bonds among the Early South Carolina Gentry ( Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press , 2000); Annette Atkins , We Grew Up Together. Brothers and Sisters in Nineteenth-Century America ( Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press , 2001). David Sabean , Kinship in Neckarhausen 1700-1870 ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1998).

Examples of studies that have focused on kin relations outside the household include: Sabean, Kinship in Neckarhausen; Wendy Post , Frans van Poppel , Evert van Imhoff and Ellen Kruse , “ Reconstructing the Extended Kin-network in the Netherlands with Genealogical Data: Methods, Problems, Results ,” Population Studies 51, no. 3 (1997): 263—78; Muriel Neven , “ The Influence of the Wider Kin Group on Individual Life Course Transitions: Results from the Pays de Herve (Belgium), 1846-1900 ,” Continuity and Change 17, no. 3 (2002): 405—35. David Kertzer , Dennis Hogan and Nancy Karweit , “ Kinship Beyond the Household in a Nineteenth-Century Italian Town ,” Continuity and Change 7, no. 1 ( 1992): 103—121. Alice Kasakoff and Inez Egerbladh , “ Kin in Place. A Comparison of Northern Sweden and the American North in 1850,” (paper presented at the SSHA 2005 in Portland).

Marilyn Strathern , After Nature. English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1992). Janet Carsten , Cultures of Relatedness. New Approaches to the Study of Kinship ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 2000). Peter P. Schweitzer (ed.), Dividends of Kinship. Meanings and Uses of Social Relatedness ( London and New York: Routledge , 2000). Janet Carsten , After Kinship ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 2004).

Henk de Haan , In the Shadow of the Tree. Kinship, Property and Inheritance among Farm Families ( Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis , 1994), 32.

Michael Young and Peter Wilmott , Family and Kinship in East London ( London: Routledge and Kegan Paul , 1957); E. Bott , Family and Social Networks. Roles, Norms, and External Relationships in Ordinary Urban Families ( London: Tavistock Publications , 1957). R. Firth , J. Hubert and A. Forge , Families and Their Relatives ( London: Routledge and Kegan Paul , 1956).

Stanley Wasserman and Katherine Faust, Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1994).

These developments have not passed unnoticed. Davidoff, for instance, has recently argued to include kinship as a category in historical research. Davidoff , “ Kinship as a Conceptual Category .” Others have pleaded to incorporate the social network approach as an analytic paradigm in family demography in order to advance the study of kin contextualization of households in the past. Andrejs Plakans and Charles Wetherell , “ Households and Kinship Networks: The Costs and Benefits of Contextualization ,” Continuity and Change 18, no. 1 (2003): 49—76 . Barry Wellman and Charles Wetherell , “ Social Network Analysis of Historical Communities: Some Questions from the Present for the Past ,” The History of the Family. An International Quarterly 1, no. 1 (1996): 97—121 . Charles Wetherell , Andrejs Plakans , and Barry Wellman , “ Social Networks, Kinship, and Community in Eastern Europe ,” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 24, no. 4 (1994): 639—63 .

Barry Wellman and Scot Wortley , “ Brothers' Keepers: Situating Kinship Relations in Broader Networks of Social Support ,” Sociological Perspectives 32, no. 3 (1989): 274—75 . Wellman and Wortley , “ Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support ,” American Journal of Sociology 96 (1990): 558—88 .

10.

De Haan , In the Shadow of the Tree, 3.

11.

Abbas Tashakkori and Charles Teddlie (eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research ( Thousands Oaks , London , New Dehli: Sage Publications , 2003).

12.

F. Le Play , L'Organisation de la Famille ( Tours: Marne , 1875). Emmanuel Todd , The Explanation of Ideology. Family Structures and Social Systems ( Oxford : Basil Blackwell , 1985). Idem, The Causes of Progress. Culture, Authority and Change ( Oxford: Basil Blackwell , 1987). Idem, L'invention de l'Europe ( Paris : Éditions du Seuil , 1990).

13.

Reher, who actually makes a different distinction in family patterns in Europe based only on the kind and timing of the separation process between parents and children, has connected household patterns to the strength of ties to the wider kin group. In southern European countries where the leaving home process is stretched out and children more often remain at home, ties with household and kin are strong, while in northwestern European societies, where separation between parents and children is relatively rapid, kin ties are weaker. David Sven Reher, “Family Ties in Western Europe: Persistent Contrasts ,” Population and Development Review 24, no. 2 (1998): 203—34 .

14.

Bott, Family and Social Network, 217. Micheli has also explicitly connected Le Play's family typology to households' wider networks on the basis of the work of Bott. Giuseppe A. Micheli , “ Kinship, Family and Social Network: The Anthropological Embedment of Fertility Change in Europe .” Demographic Research 3, article 13 ( 2000), http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol3/13 .

15.

Bott, Family and Social Network, 59.

16.

Franz Höllinger and Max Haller , “ Kinship and Social Networks in Modern Societies: A Cross-cultural Comparison among Seven Nations ,” European Sociological Review 6, no. 2 (1990): 103—124 .

17.

Sigrid Khera , “ An Austrian Peasant Village under Rural Industrialization,” Behaviour Science Notes : Quarterly Bulletin 7 (1972): 32 .

18.

Sonya Salamon , “ Ethnic Differences in Farm Family Land Transfers ,” Rural Sociology 45, no. 2 (1980): 290—308 . Idem, “ Sibling Solidarity as an Operating Strategy in Illinois Agriculture ,” Rural Sociology 47, no. 2 (1982): 349—368 . Idem, Prairie Patrimony. Family, Farming, and Community in the Midwest ( Chapel Hill & London: The University of North Carolina Press , 1992), 119—197 .

19.

Martine Segalen , “`Avoir sa part': Sibling Relations in Partible Inheritance Brittany,” in Interest and Emotion: Essays on the Study of Family and Kinship, ed. Hans Medick and David W. Sabean ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1984), 130.

20.

Rolande Bonnain , “ Household Mind and the Ecology of the Central Pyrenees in the 19th Century: Fathers, Sons, and Collective Landed Property,” The History of the Family. An International Quarterly 10 (2005): 249—270 .

21.

A.H. Crijns and F.W.J. Kriellaars , “Het traditionele patroon in de agrarische sector [The traditional pattern in the agricultural sector],” in Geschiedenis van Noord-Brabant. Deel I. Traditie en modernisering. 1796-1890 [History of Noord-Brabant. Volume I. Tradition and modernization. 1796-1890], ed. H.F.J.M. van den Eerenbeemt ( Amsterdam / Meppel: Boom , 1996), 206.

22.

A.H. Crijns and F.W.J. Kriellaars , “Ontwikkeling en verandering in de agrarische sector [Development and change in the agricultural sector],” in Geschiedenis van Noord-Brabant. Deel II. Emancipatie en industrialisering. 1890-1945 [History of Noord-Brabant. Volume II. Emancipation and industrialization. 1890-1945], ed. H.F.J.M. van den Eerenbeemt ( Amsterdam / Meppel: Boom , 1996). Crijns and Kriellaars, “Het traditionele patroon [The traditional pattern],” 169-70, 191, 195, 198, 200, 208.

23.

Five regional variants of the West-European marriage pattern have been distinguished in the Netherlands. The areas under study comprise three of them. Figures 2 and 3 are based on provincial figures and thus comprise larger regions than the study areas. The proportion of married men in the age category of 25 to 29 in Figure 2 approximates regional opportunities to marry early. The shares of unmarried men between 40 and 44 in Figure 3 indicate regional differences in celibacy. E.W. Hofstee , Korte demografische geschiedenis van Nederland van 1800 tot heden [Short demographic history of the Netherlands 1800 - present] ( Haarlem: Fibula-Van Dishoeck , 1981), 13—27.

24.

Jan Kok , “ Bevolkingsgroei, gezondheid en gezin. Van achterblijver tot koploper,” in Geschiedenis van Holland [History of Holland] vol. III, ed. Thimo de Nijs and Eelco Beukers ( Hilversum : Verloren , 2003), 31.

25.

Hofstee, Korte demografische geschiedenis [Short demographic history], 21, 27.

26.

Theo Engelen and Paul Klep , “Bevolking: van huwelijks- naar geboortenbeperking [Population: from marriage to birth control],” in Geschiedenis van Noord-Brabant. Deel II. Emancipatie en industrialisering [History of Noord-Brabant. Volume II. Emancipation and industrialization]. 1890-1945, ed. H.F.J.M. van den Eerenbeemt ( Amsterdam / Meppel: Boom , 1996), 31.

27.

J.A. Verduin , “Het gezin in demografisch perspectief [The family in demographic perspective],” in Gezinsgeschiedenis: vier eeuwen gezin in Nederland [Family history: four centuries of family in the Netherlands] ed. G.A. Kooy ( Assen: Van Gorcum , 1985 ), 77.

28.

Verduin , “ Het gezin in demografisch perspectief [The family in demographic perspective] ,” 90—1.

29.

Uitkomsten van het onderzoek naar den toestand van den landbouw in Nederland, ingesteld door de landbouwcommissie, benoemd bij KB van 18 september 1886, nr. 28 [Results from a study of the situation of agriculture in the Netherlands, commissioned by Royal Decree of 18 September 1886, nr. 28] (' s-Gravenhage: Gebrs. Langenhuysen 1890), XXXVII-10.

30.

This was shown in a study on farmers and inheritance in the villages of Akersloot and Oudorp (situated about 20 kilometers to the west of Wormerland) between 1830 and 1880. Dirk Damsma and T. Zonneveld (1987), “ Het verdeelde erf. Een onderzoek naar de wijze waarop de erfoverdracht plaats vond in de boerengemeenschap van de Noordhollandse gemeenten Akersloot en Oudorp tussen 1830 en 1880 [The divided yard. A study into the way property transmission took place among farmers in the Noord-Holland municipalities Akersloot and Oudorp between 1830 and 1880 ,” in Proceedings van het congres Balans en Perspectief [Proceedings of the conference Balance and Perspective] (Utrecht, 1987), 626, 629—632.

31.

Damsma and Zonneveld , “Het verdeelde erf [The divided yard],” 626, 630. Dirk Damsma and Jan Kok , “Ingedroogde harten? Partnerkeuze en sociale reproductie van de Noord-Hollandse boerenstand in de negentiende en vroeg-twintigste eeuw [Dried up hearts? Partner choice and social reproduction of the Noord-Holland farming class in the nineteenth and early-twentieth century] ,” in Genegenheid en gelegenheid: twee eeuwen partnerkeuze en huwelijk [Affection and Opportunity: Two Centuries of Partner Choice and Marriage] ed. Jan Kok and Marco H.D. van Leeuwen ( Amsterdam: Aksant , 2005), 301—2.

32.

Uitkomsten [Results], 12.

33.

J. Best , “ Boerenerfrecht in Overijssel [Farmers' Inheritance in Overijssel],” Volk en Bodem. Maandblad voor volkspolitiek, volkscultuur en agrarisch leven [Nation and Soil. Monthly Magazine for National Politics, National Culture and Agricultural Life] (1941): 265—266 .

34.

Best, “Boerenerfrecht in Overijssel [Farmers' Inheritance in Overijssel],” 270.

35.

In 1941, it was still normal that, even when parents didn't have a testament, the farm was not divided. Best, “Boerenerfrecht in Overijssel [Farmers' Inheritance in Overijssel],” 267.

36.

Uitkomsten LXXVII [Results LXXVII], 7, 15.

37.

L. Deckers , De landbouwers van den Noordbrabantschen zandgrond. Eene bijdrage tot de kennis der maatschappelijke en oeconomische ontwikkeling van de Nederlandschen boerenstand in de negentiende en twintigste eeuw [The Farmers of the Noord-Brabant Sandy Soil. A Contribution to the Knowledge of the Societal and Economic Development of the Dutch Farming Class in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Century], 155 ( Eindhoven: Vervoort , 1912).

38.

J. Baert , “ Deling van grond bij boerennalatenschap [Division of the Land at Farmers' Inheritance] ,” De Pacht. Maandblad van de Nederlandse Pachtraad [The Rent. Monthly magazine of the Dutch Rent Council] 9, no. 5 (1949): 50 .

39.

Wellman and Wortley , “Different Strokes from Different Folks,” 582.

40.

Glen H. Elder Jr. , Children of the Great Depression. Social Change in Life Experience ( Boulder: Westview Press 1999 [1974]).

41.

Colleen L. Johnson , “ Sibling Solidarity: Its Origin and Functioning in Italian-American Families ,” Journal of Marriage and the Family 44, no. 1 (1982): 155—67. G.A. Kooy , De oude samenwoning op het nieuwe platteland: een studie over de familiehuishouding in de agrarische Achterhoek [The old pattern of coresidence in the new countryside: a study about the family household in the agrarian Achterhoek] ( Assen: Van Gorcum, 1959), 25. Max Weber , The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (London etc.: Routledge , 2001 [1920]). Bradley J. Strahan , Does Religion Support Family Relationships?: It Depends on What Kind of Religion ” (paper presented at the Australian Family Research Conference , Brisbane, 1996).

42.

Kristin Y. Mack , “ The Effects of Early Parental Death on Sibling Relationships in Later Life ,” Omega 49, no. 2 (2004): 131—148 .

43.

Christian Smith and Philip Kim , “Family Religious Involvement and the Quality of Family Relationships for Early Adolescents. A Research Report of The National Study of Youth and Religion,” Number 4 ( Chapel Hill: National Study of Youth and Religion , 2003).

44.

Ellen Verbakel and Paul M. De Graaf , “ Contacten tussen broers en zussen: traditionaliteit, homogeniteit en restricties [Contacts Between Siblings: Traditionalism, Homogeneity, and Restrictions] ,” Mens & Maatschappij [Man & Society] 79, no. 4 (2004): 389—410 .

45.

James H.S. Bossard and E.S. Boll, The Large Family System. An Original Study in the Sociology of Family Behavior ( Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press , 1956).

46.

P.F. Lazarsfeld and R.K. Merton , “Friendship as Social Process: a Substantive and Methodological Analysis,” in Freedom and Control in Modern Society, ed. M. Berger , T. Abel and C.H. Page ( New York: Van Nostrand , 1954), 18—66.

47.

Victor G. Cicirelli , “ Sibling Relationships in Cross-Cultural Perspective ,” Journal of Marriage and the Family 56, no.1 (1994): 14 .

48.

Marieke Voorpostel , Sibling support. The exchange of help among brothers and sisters in the Netherlands ( Utrecht: ICS dissertation, 2007), 40.

49.

Lynn K. White and Agnes Riedmann , “ When the Brady Bunch Grows Up: Step/Half — and Fullsibling Relationships in Adulthood ,” Journal of Marriage and the Family 54 ( 1992): 197—208 .

50.

It should be noted however that in our time, contact could also easily be maintained over longer distances, either by telephone or by Internet. Sonia Miner and Peter Uhlenberg , “ Intragenerational Proximity and the Social Role of Siblings after Midlife ,” Family Relations 46, no. 2 (1997): 145—53 .

51.

C.P.M. Knipscheer , J. de Jong Gierveld , T.G. van Tilburg , P.A. Dykstra , ed. Living Arrangements and Social Networks of Older Adults ( Amsterdam: VU University Press , 1995). 52. Theo van Tilburg , “Delineation of the Social Network and Differences in Network Size,” in Living Arrangements , ed. Knipscheer et al., 83—96.

52.

Marco H.D. van Leeuwen , Ineke Maas and Andrew Miles , HISCO. Historical International Standard Classification of Occupations ( Leuven: Leuven University Press , 2002). Ineke Maas and Marco van Leeuwen , “Recode job from HISCO into HISCLASS,” (unpublished SPSS syntax file, 2004).

53.

Joop Hox , Multilevel Analysis. Techniques and Applications ( Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates , 2002).

54.

De Haan , In the Shadow of Tree, 83.

55.

Sjoerd Beugelsdijk and Ton van Schaik, “Differences in Social Capital Between 54 Western European Regions,” Regional Studies: Journal of the Regional Studies Association 39, no. 8 (2005): 1053—64.

56.

We did not include religious background because of multicollinearity between region and the specific mixture of religions in the areas. We estimated separate models for Model 2 and 5 (results not included) in which we replaced region with religion, in order to find out whether the regional effects were in reality effects of religion. However, religious background does not have a significant effect on contact frequency between siblings. Moreover, the models including religion instead of region are not significant. Thus, although they might have played a part in it, regional differences cannot be equalized with religious differences.

57.

Sjoerd Beugelsdijk and Ton van Schaik, “Social Capital and Regional Economic Growth,” working paper faculty of Economics, Tilburg University (2003).

58.

Monica Das Gupta , “ Lifeboat Versus Corporate Ethic: Social and Demographic Implications of Stem and Joint Families ,” Social Science & Medicine 49 ( 1999): 173—84 . Particularly with regard to the study of sibling relations a comprehensive cross-cultural approach, including Asian societies where interdependence among siblings is institutionalized in the life course, might produce intriguing results. T.S. Weisner , “ Overview. Sibling Similarity and Difference in Different Cultures,” in Siblings in South Asia: Brothers and Sisters in Cultural Context ed. Charles William Nuckolls ( New York and London: Guilford Press , 1993), 1-15 . P. G. Zukow, ed. Sibling Interaction Across Cultures. Theoretical and Methodological Issues ( New York: Springer-Verlag , 1989). R.A. Nye , “ Kinship, Male Bonds, and Masculinity in Comparative Perspective ,” The American Historical Review 105 ( 2000): 1—29 .