This article discusses problems and issues arising from using the case method and from attempts to validate a particular innovative case method process that entails using a Classroom De-Gamer™ to start discussions. The article asserts a major purpose of the case method is to produce schema and script learning in students. Data from several surveys are presented showing the opinions of students regarding the random selection device, their performance in the random selection case method process, and the performance of the teacher in the process. The findings show that the process seems to produce superior results regarding the amount and quality of learning produced in students. On the other hand, the data show students feel their grades will not reflect their performance. The problem is how to fairly evaluate the performance of both students and teachers when a random selection case method is used.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbelsonR. P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36(7), 715–729.
2.
AllenJ. R., & AllenB. A. (1988). Scripts and permissions: Some unexamined assumptions and connotations. Transactional Analysis Journal, 18, 283–293.
3.
AllenJ. R., & AllenB. A. (1991). Towards a constructivist TA. In LoriaB. R. (Ed.), The Stamford papers: Selections from the 29th annual ITAA conference (pp. 1–22). Madison, WI: Omnipress.
4.
AndersonR. C. (1977). The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise: General discussion of the conference. In AndersonR. C., SpiroR. J., & MontagueW. E. (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 415–431). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5.
BerneE. (1963). The structure and dynamics of organizations and groups. New York: Grove Press.
6.
BerneE. (1964). Games people play: The psychology of human relationships. New York: Grove Press.
7.
BuberM. (1969). Genuine dialogue and the possibilities of peace (FriedmanM., trans.). In WilliamsE. W. & ZahnH. (Eds.), Men of dialogue: Martin Buber and Albrecht Goes (pp. 20–27). New York: Funk & Wagnails. (Original work published 1957)
8.
CarlsonR. (1981). Studies in script theory. I. Adult analogs of a childhood nuclear scene. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3), 501–510.
9.
ChristensenC. R., GarvinD. A., & SweetA. (Eds.). (1991). Education for judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
10.
CohenA. R., FinkS., GadonH., & WillitsR. (1992). Effective behavior in organizations: Learning from the interplay of cases, concepts, and student experiences: Cases, concepts, and student experiences (5th ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.
11.
CollinsJ., & LazierW. (1995). Managing the small to mid-sized company: Concepts and cases. Chicago: Irwin.
12.
de YoungJ. E. (1991). Cases in small business management: A strategic problems approach. Dover, NH: Upstart Publishing.
13.
DooleyA. R., & SkinnerW. (1977). Casing case method methods. Academy of Management Review, 2, 277–289.
14.
GagnéR. M. (1977). The conditions of learning (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
15.
GellertS. A. (1983). Nuts come in pairs: All you wanted to know about couples' relationships and were afraid to ask. New York: Cite Press.
16.
GioiaD. A., & PooleP. P. (1984). Scripts in organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 9, 449–459.
17.
GroderM. (1996, August). The fractionated nature of human nature. Presentation given at the Annual Conference of the International Transactional Analysis Association, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
18.
KarpmanS. B. (1968). Fairy tales and script drama analysis. Transactional Analysis Bulletin, 7(26), 39–43.
19.
KarpmanS. B. (1975). The bias box for competing psychotherapies. Transactional Analysis Journal, 5, 107–116.
20.
LanktonS. R. (1980). Practical magic: A translation of basic neuro-linguistic programming into clinical psychotherapy. Cupertino, CA: Meta Publications.
21.
LordR. G., & KernanM. C. (1987). Scripts as determinants of purposeful behavior in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 12, 265–277.
22.
LoriaB. R. (1991). Integrative family therapy: A constructivist perspective. In LoriaB. R. (Ed.), The Stamford papers: Selections from the 29th annual ITAA conference (pp. 35–41). Madison, WI: Omnipress.
23.
MaturanaH. R., & VarelaF. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing.
24.
MaturanaH. R., & VarelaF. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: New Science Library.
25.
NeisserU. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.
26.
NisbettR., & RossL. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27.
PiagetJ. (1976). The grasp of consciousness: Action and concept in the young child (WedgwoodS., trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
SchankR. C., & AbelsonR. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29.
SimonH. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
30.
StapletonR. J. (1978). The chain of ego states. Transactional Analysis Journal, 8, 215–219.
31.
StapletonR. (1979a). The classroom de-gamer. Transactional Analysis Journal, 9, 145–146.
32.
StapletonR. J. (1979b). De-gaming teaching and learning: How to motivate learners and invite OKness. Statesboro, GA: Effective Learning Publications.
33.
StapletonR. J. (1990). Academic entrepreneurship: Using the case method to simulate competitive business markets. The Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, XIV(IV) 88–104.
34.
StapletonR. J. (1991). Game-freer teaching and learning: How to increase intellectual productivity in schools by decreasing psychological games. In LoriaB. R. (Ed.), The Stamford papers: Selections from the 29th annual ITAA conference (pp. 250–267). Madison, WI: Omnipress.
StapletonR. J., MurkisonG., & StapletonD. C. (1997). The significance of schemata and scripts in entrepreneurship education and development. In MonroyT. G., ReichertJ., HoyF., & WilliamsK. (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship education: Volume IV (pp. 89–104). Akron, OH: The Project for Excellence in Entrepreneurship Education.
37.
SteinerC. M. (1974). Scripts people live: Transactional analysis of life scripts. New York: Grove Press.
38.
StevensonH. H., RobertsM. J., & GrousbeckH. I. (1994). New business ventures and the entrepreneur (4th ed.). Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
