In this article, the concept of symbiosis is described in terms of two parts: the transactional symbiosis and the attachment. This permits us to understand the concept in a new way and demonstrates why symbiosis can be so resistant to change. The suggestion is made that any change in this area requires both behavior change and a change in how one senses one's boundaries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association.(1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
BaderE.PearsonP. T. (1988). In quest of the mythical mate: Developmental stages of couplehood. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
3.
BeatyJ. J. (1994). Observing development of the young child (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillian.
4.
BeeH. (1978). The developing child (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
5.
BerneE. (1961). Transactional analysis in psychotherapy: A systematic individual and social psychiatry. New York: Ballantine.
6.
BerneE. (1964). Games people play: The psychology of human relationships. New York: Grove Press.
7.
BlackstoneP. (1993). The dynamic child: Integration of second-order structure, object relations and self psychology. Transactional Analysis Journal, 23, 216–234.
8.
BowlbyJ. (1971). Attachment: Vol. 1 of Attachment and loss. New York: Pelican. (Original work published 1969).
9.
EvansK. R. (1994). Healing shame: A Gestalt perspective. Transactional Analysis Journal, 24, 103–108.
10.
González-MenaJ. (1993). Multicultural issues in child care. London: Mayfield.
11.
González-MenaJ.EyerD. W. (1989). Infants, toddlers, and caregivers. London: Mayfield.
12.
HaykinM. D. (1980). Type casting: The influence of early childhood experience upon the structure of the child ego state. Transactional Analysis Journal, 10, 354–364.
13.
. KaplanP. S. (1991). A child's odyssey: Child and adolescent development. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
14.
LangmeierJ.MatejcekZ. (1975). Psychological deprivation in childhood (ManganG. L., Ed). St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
15.
MahlerM. S. (1967). On human symbiosis and the vicissitudes of individuation. Journal of the Psychoanalytic Association. 15, 710–762.
16.
MahlerM. S.FurerM. (1963). Certain aspects of the separation-individuation phase. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 32, 1–14.
17.
MahlerM. S.PineF.BergmanA. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant: Symbiosis and individuation. New York: Basic Books.
18.
MatzeM. G. (1988). Reciprocity in script formation: A revision of the concept of symbiosis. Transactional Analysis Journal, 18, 304–308.
19.
NoveyT. B.Porter-SteeleN.GobesL.MasseyR. F. (1993). Ego states and the self-concept: A panel presentation and discussion. Transactional Analysis Journal, 23. 123–138.
20.
SchafferH. R. (1978). The development of interpersonal behaviour. In TajfelH.FraserC. (Eds.), Introducing social psychology (pp. 105–125). New York: Penguin.
21.
SchiffA. W.SchiffJ. L. (1971). Passivity. Transactional Analysis Journal, 1(1), 71–78.
22.
SchiffJ. L.SchiffA. W.MellorK.SchiffE.SchiffS.RichmanD.FishmanJ.WolzL.FishmanC.MombD. (1975). Cathexis reader: Transactional analysis treatment of psychosis. New York: Harper & Row.
23.
SpitzR. A. (1945). Hospitalism: An inquiry into the genesis of psychiatric conditions in early childhood. In FreudA. (Eds.), Psychoanalytic study of the child (Vol. 1, pp. 53–74). New York: International Universities Press.
24.
WagnerA. (1994). Blue ego states for effective communication. Transactional Analysis Journal, 24, 281–284.
25.
WhiteT. (1997). Treatment of the I+U? and I−U? life positions. Transactional Analysis Journal, 27, 57–64.
