Narrative assumptions are explored in relation to social constructionism, radical constructivism, and postmodernism. Common misunderstandings concerning these concepts are discussed, and distinctions are drawn, especially in relation to practicing a therapy that is informed by a narrative metaphor.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
DickersonV.ZimmermanJ. (In press). Myths, misconceptions, and a word or two about politics. Journal of Systemic Therapies.
3.
DoanR. (1995). The art and craft of externalizing the problem. Journal of Psychological Practice, 1, 60–66.
4.
FreedmanJ.CombsG. (1996). Narrative therapy: The social construction of preferred realities. New York: Norton.
5.
GergenK. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist. 40, 266–275.
6.
HoffmanL. (1990). Constructing realities: An art of lenses. Family Process. 29, 1–12.
7.
NicholsM. P.SchwartzR. C. (1995). Family therapy: Concepts and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
8.
O'HaraM.AndersonW. T. (1991, September/October). Welcome to the postmodern world. Family Therapy Networker, 18–22.
9.
ParryA. (1997). Why we tell stories: The narrative construction of reality. Transactional Analysis Journal. 27, 118–127.
10.
ParryA.DoanR. (1994). Story re-visions: Narrative therapy in the postmodern world. New York: Guilford Press.
11.
ParryA. (1990). Story connecting: What therapy is all about. The Calgary Participator. 1, 12–15.
12.
PepperS. (1942). World hypothesis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
WhiteM. (1989). The externalizing of problems and the re-authoring of lives. In WhiteM., Selected papers (5–28). Adelaide, Australia: DulwichCentre Publications.
