This article considers the nature of dual relationships and how they are viewed by various legal and professional codes, including the ITAA (1992) Statement of Ethics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy (1991). AAMFT code of ethics. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Board of Behavioral Science Examiners. (1990). The laws and regulations relating to the practice of licensed clinical social workers. Sacramento, CA: Author.
4.
California Association of Marriage and Family Therapists. (1992). CAMFT code of ethics. San Diego, CA: Author.
5.
California Board of Psychology. (1993). Business and professions code. Sacramento, CA: Author.
6.
International Transactional Analysis Association. (1992). ITAA statement of ethics. In International transactional analysis association membership directory (1992–1993) (pp. 67–68). San Francisco: Author.
7.
JorgensonL. (1992). Clinical laws for therapist-patient sexual contact. Psychotherapy Finances, p. 5.
8.
KitchenerK. S. (1988). Dual role relationships: What makes them so problematic?Journal of Counseling and Development, 67217–221.
9.
LeslieR. S. (1993). Dual relationships. The California Therapist, 5(1), 6 ff.
10.
National Association of Social Workers. (1979). Code of ethics. Silver Spring, MD: Author.
11.
Psychotherapy Finances. (1992). 18(9). Available at P.O. Box 8979, Jupiter, FL 33468.
12.
QuinnV. (n.y.). Professional therapy never includes sex. Sacramento: Department of General Services. Available from the Board of Behavioral Science Examiners, 1021 “O” Street, Sacramento, CA 95825.
